What about domestic and international sources? Domestic sources would definitely be a no-no. International sources on the other hand are freely advertised in the open on many steroid boards. It’s not exactly a secret. Any half idiot LE can track these down.
[quote]kayveeay wrote:
"
Don’t post sources.
Don’t post UGL lab names
Don’t post websites
Only post vague descriptions. I.e. I got my sachets in the mail today, or my source for SERMs is really A Great Guy.
"[/quote]
Who IS this guy? fuckin’ hell man. You’re a cocky cunt!
[quote]Dopamineloveaffa wrote:
What about domestic and international sources? Domestic sources would definitely be a no-no. International sources on the other hand are freely advertised in the open on many steroid boards. It’s not exactly a secret. Any half idiot LE can track these down.[/quote]
Good point, but what might be international to you could be domestic for another, no?
[quote]Makavali wrote:
Dopamineloveaffa wrote:
What about domestic and international sources? Domestic sources would definitely be a no-no. International sources on the other hand are freely advertised in the open on many steroid boards. It’s not exactly a secret. Any half idiot LE can track these down.
Good point, but what might be international to you could be domestic for another, no?[/quote]
They’re basically from countries where steroids are legal; Thailand, Greece, Turkey, Iran, Egypt, Pakistan, India, Bulgaria, etc…
[quote]Dopamineloveaffa wrote:
They’re basically from countries where steroids are legal; Thailand, Greece, Turkey, Iran, Egypt, Pakistan, India, Bulgaria, etc…[/quote]
That seems OK, but another concern is that Law Enforcement can freely look at these boards, and could potentially learn to spot packages from specific suppliers.
Personally, I don’t believe source posting at all would be a good idea, but that’s why I opened this up for debate.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
That seems OK, but another concern is that Law Enforcement can freely look at these boards, and could potentially learn to spot packages from specific suppliers.
Personally, I don’t believe source posting at all would be a good idea, but that’s why I opened this up for debate.[/quote]
But the international sources are openly advertising. If they’re not trying to keep it a secret, why should we?
I’ll PM you some examples.
[quote]Dopamineloveaffa wrote:
But the international sources are openly advertising. If they’re not trying to keep it a secret, why should we?
I’ll PM you some examples.[/quote]
I had a look, but now I’m all confused by your username change.
International sources seem OK, as long as they have been posted somewhere else too. Most of those sources seem to sponsor the links you gave me.
I believe that even though they are easily accessible through google I wouldn’t want to post the names of the international sources. It goes back to my spotlight shinning. Better safe than sorry boys. My two pennies. Giveth me a bump! Oh Lord!
[quote]Growing_Boy wrote:
I believe that even though they are easily accessible through google I wouldn’t want to post the names of the international sources. It goes back to my spotlight shinning. Better safe than sorry boys. My two pennies. Giveth me a bump! Oh Lord! [/quote]
Also a good point. Posting sources does bring attention back to this board, and not good attention either. The last thing anyone wants is for this to turn into a “bro” board.
I don’t get that term, bro board. Don’t we band together when we seek feedback or advice. Doesn’t that act require some sense of brotherhood. We are all united by the fact that we choose to take in substances that enhance or surpass what mother nature gave us. Yet again, on my expedition through the internet I found many boards that would define a bro board in my opinion.
They were merely threads filled with mindless fodder meant for drooling readers. An example: “Hey, I’m 19 with 1 year training exp and ready for some dbol and test,” followed by a “remember to use nolva or something like that one guy said bro.” A bushy on these forums would be like Jesus hovering over the White House preaching. No premeditated AAS protocols.
With the, “hey I wanna get swole,” mentality some of these individuals decided to take the step down a path that for me has required great personal loss and emotional anguish. Beginning protocols without the slightest idea of what to expect or do when they run out of their 100 Dbols and a handful of ampules of test e.
Comfortably ignorant to the fact that by them placing those pink pills in their mouths and drawing the oil from those ampules they have begun down a path, that sometimes doesn’t provide a way back to normalcy. A path that should be treated with outmost respect. Wow, it appears that I can spell a four letter word RJ. My two quasi-eloquent centavos.
arent these rules down to the mods?
[quote] JJ wrote:
arent these rules down to the mods?[/quote]
They’ve PM’d me about them before, and they’ll notify me if any of the rules go against T-Nation.com policy. Other than that, I don’t think they have a problem with them.
I mean whether we are allowed to share sources or not on public forum. That rule is there due to the fact they will be shut down if we did that.
Know what i mean?
But fair comment.