95% GAry Johnson
93% Mitt romney
76% Virgil Good
58% Obama
24% Rocky
16% Jill
89% Republican
84% Libertarian
39% Democratic
9% Green
49% of Mass voters
56% of American
Gary Johnson 81%
Virgil Good 76%
Mitt Romney 73%
Barack Obama 66%
TX Vote 60%
American 58%
New to the party, but here are my results:
Obama 90%
Jill Stein 85%
Gary Johnson 56%
Mitt Romney 9%
PA Voters 62%
American Voters 60%
96% Dem
92% Green
42% Lib
2% Republican
Side with Obama on: science, healthcare, economic, immigration
Side with Stein on: environmental, foreign policy, domestic policy
Side with Johson on: social issues
88% Chester Alan Arthur
[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
88% Chester Alan Arthur[/quote]
Lol!
I saw your name and I was rubbing my hands in anticipation as the page loaded.
As usual, you do not fail to disappoint, Doc.
84%
Barack Obama Democrat
on healthcare, foreign policy, immigration, science, and environmental issues
83%
Jill Stein Green
on economic, science, foreign policy, immigration, and domestic policy issues
61%
Gary Johnson Libertarian
on domestic policy, immigration, and environmental issues
33%
Mitt Romney Republican
on social and environmental issues
51%
Texas Voters
on science, foreign policy, immigration, social, and environmental issues.
53%
American Voters
on science, foreign policy, immigration, domestic policy, and environmental issues.
The ranking is about what I thought it would be, but I was surprised it rated me that much pro-Obama and Jill Stein Green.
94%
Democrat
87%
Green
43%
Libertarian
28%
Jesus Christ, this test must be pretty inaccurate or the “add your own stance” feature really throws the results for a loop, because I apparently agree with the Green Party candidate and President Obama at a 77% clip even though I have no intention to vote for either one. I agreed with Romney on only 2% of the issues, and not at all on major ones, and while I won’t be voting for him either, I’d hardly say I disagree with 98% of his stated policies.
[quote]Cortes wrote:
[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
88% Chester Alan Arthur[/quote]
Lol!
I saw your name and I was rubbing my hands in anticipation as the page loaded.
As usual, you do not fail to disappoint, Doc. [/quote]
A modest man with much to be modest about:
“No duty was neglected in his administration, and no adventurous project alarmed the nation.” (His epitaph)
“No adventurous project alarmed the nation.”
How dif’rent from our choices’ patulous oration.
[quote]florelius wrote:
Here is mine:
Maximilien de Robespierre 96%
Karl Marx 97%
Vladamir Lenin 94%
Leon Trotsky 95%
Joseph Stalin 98%
Mao Zedong 93%
Ho Chi Minh 92%
Fidel Castro 97%
Barack Hussein Obama 100%
[/quote]
fixed 
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
Here is mine:
Maximilien de Robespierre 96%
Karl Marx 97%
Vladamir Lenin 94%
Leon Trotsky 95%
Joseph Stalin 98%
Mao Zedong 93%
Ho Chi Minh 92%
Fidel Castro 97%
Barack Hussein Obama 100%
[/quote]
fixed :)[/quote]
Haha, Doc, SexMachine is giving you a run for your money here, though.
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]Cortes wrote:
[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
88% Chester Alan Arthur[/quote]
Lol!
I saw your name and I was rubbing my hands in anticipation as the page loaded.
As usual, you do not fail to disappoint, Doc. [/quote]
Ha ha!
Nice insult, Cortes![/quote]
?
It was certainly not my intention to insult in this particular case.
Maybe I’m misunderstanding something.
That was interesting
89% Gary Johnson
79% Jill Stein
73% Barack Obama
66% Mitt Romney.
Guess I’m more middle of the road than I thought I was.
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]Cortes wrote:
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]Cortes wrote:
[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
88% Chester Alan Arthur[/quote]
Lol!
I saw your name and I was rubbing my hands in anticipation as the page loaded.
As usual, you do not fail to disappoint, Doc. [/quote]
Ha ha!
Nice insult, Cortes![/quote]
?
It was certainly not my intention to insult in this particular case.
Maybe I’m misunderstanding something.
[/quote]
“You do not fail to disappoint” = “You always disappoint”
Of course I know that was inadvertant, but found it humorous.[/quote]
Ah crap. I didn’t even see that the second time I read it. This is like
like those find-the-error sentences that are simple yet maddeningly hard.