[quote]on edge wrote:
Well, what do ya know, Bonobos are little sex-pots. Everyone has sex with everyone and to answer my question, they don’t engage in warfare with other troops. Varq was spot on.[/quote]
Yup.
They put the Pan in “pansexual” (you have to know a bit about taxonomy to get this one).
They are the hippie chimps, making love, not war. Which means they are probably doomed to extinction.
[quote]on edge wrote:
Well, what do ya know, Bonobos are little sex-pots. Everyone has sex with everyone and to answer my question, they don’t engage in warfare with other troops. Varq was spot on.[/quote]
Yup.
They put the Pan in “pansexual” (you have to know a bit about taxonomy to get this one).
They are the hippie chimps, making love, not war. Which means they are probably doomed to extinction.
[/quote]
Yeah, lets just be glad that they are part of our heritage too, we might be even more insufferable if they were not.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
If you lined up 10 people knowing they were sexual active (not with each other) how many of the 10 would you assume have sex with the same gender?
[/quote]
[quote]Facepalm_Death wrote:
But ANIMALS in the WILD procreate via PIV, which is rape. So rape is natural?[/quote]
Pretty much.
Especially among dolphins, orang-utans and chimpanzees.
[/quote]
Of course, the original premise (PIV Sex is unnatural, and therefore bad) is logically unsound even if it were true: it is a perfect example of a fallacious appeal to nature.