Philadelphia Open Carry

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

Even when I was younger, my best friend’s then girlfriend’s little brother, was carrying a gun in 6th grade! Under your analysis, there should be no gun crime in Camden NJ or Philadelphia because so many people have guns. Well, it doesn’t deter gun crime at all! And, as you are now aware, Philadelphia and PA are CCP and apparently OCP. Gun crime is very high in Philadelphia. CCP or the rare OCP hasn’t dented it. [/quote]

I would venture a guess that Philly-Camden-Newark have very LOW gun ownership rates compared to the rest of the country and especially compared to Montana, an “area where a criminal knows a home is likely armed.”

There’s a whole lotta life that aint simple. Do the right thing and THEN go from there.
[/quote]

Now you’re guessing? Wrong. “Gun ownership” constitutes legal guns. We have TONS of illegal guns on the street. And a deterrent for breaking and entering is not the same deterrent for surviving in the City, walking in public…WHICH IS WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT!

I’ve already told you, and you cannot refute it; your gun won’t save you if someone is intent on shooting you. He who draws first, wins. The aggressor draws first in the City. They don’t walk 10 paces, turn and fire. The only thing that will save you is avoidance and your brain.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

So are you saying that our right to bear arms is inextricably linked to an antiquated time of muskets and cannons, in the years following rule under another Country?

[/quote]

Nope. Aint saying that.

Yep. Am saying that.

Yep. And an isolated incident that was, correct?

Nowwwwww envision thousands and thousands of Branch Davidians from coast to coast, in every valley, every city and town, every hilltop, every apartment building, every high rise, every subdivision, every farm, in some if not many military installations, from Key West to Nome and from Kauai to Portland, Maine, etc, etc…

You conjure all that up and you may very well end up with Janet Reno deciding to practice law in the Lesser Antilles all of a sudden.
[/quote]

Well, I guess you can certainly dream of militias around every corner, but it certainly is not the reality. And who polices the militias? You’re on the fringe here. Ideologically, I get you but…

I agree philosophically and practically with you push. But you have to know where TBG is coming from . He’s risk management . He works with insurance in figuring how much disasters and other nonsense is going to cost .

I’ve argued with him in the past and realized where he comes from and think I get him . He sees all the bad things snd how they can happen and what they will cost and how to avoid them . I’m sure it colors his world view .

I might not agree with it , but I can’t say he’s not a smart guy that doesn’t know his stuff . I understand things about muscles and how bad things can happen . I understand and see things different than an average trainer . I’m more risk adverse than some guys in some ways .

He can chime in and tell me I’m full of it if he likes . Though I disagree with how he’s arguing here , I would do the same thing for the same reasons . I don’t want the hassle . If I’m on Philly it’s because my wife and I are having a nice night out and she’d be nuclear if I engineered a confrontation to prove a point to the police .

I’m more concerned with dealing with her than the Philly cops .

[quote]tom63 wrote:
I agree philosophically and practically with you push. But you have to know where TBG is coming from . He’s risk management . He works with insurance in figuring how much disasters and other nonsense is going to cost .

I’ve argued with him in the past and realized where he comes from and think I get him . He sees all the bad things snd how they can happen and what they will cost and how to avoid them . I’m sure it colors his world view .

I might not agree with it , but I can’t say he’s not a smart guy that doesn’t know his stuff . I understand things about muscles and how bad things can happen . I understand and see things different than an average trainer . I’m more risk adverse than some guys in some ways .

He can chime in and tell me I’m full of it if he likes . Though I disagree with how he’s arguing here , I would do the same thing for the same reasons . I don’t want the hassle . If I’m on Philly it’s because my wife and I are having a nice night out and she’d be nuclear if I engineered a confrontation to prove a point to the police .

I’m more concerned with dealing with her than the Philly cops .[/quote]

What you said is not inaccurate, I do see things generally with regard to risk. However, with regard to this subject, I speak from experience. I know the streets and I know the street life. I wish AC were in this thread for perspective. He grew up in the streets of Baltimore. I hardly think he would think the solution is to arm more people. The feeling of “security” with a gun is illusory in many respects.

As I said, there is no lack of guns on the streets of Philadelphia - both legal and illegal, and it hasn’t held true to this line of thinking espoused by Push that people being armed reduces crime. PA is a CCP and OCP State and Philadelphia has some of the worst gun crime in the Nation. His theory, no matter what study in some suburb backs it up, fails in the big city.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

I have a premise with which you may very well disagree but here we go >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if the vast majority of law abiding, God fearing (whoops, the God fearing thing probably goes over like a lead balloon with you) Philadelphia citizens were armed in public and armed at home the criminals with their vast arsenal of illegal guns would be overwhelmed and “good” would triumph over “evil.”
[/quote]

I can stop you right here. First, give the God thing a break. The ad hominem is not necessary. For the record, it’s organized religion that I reject, not the God.

Next, Philly is chock full of churches. One of the complaints in Camden NJ from an economic/tax base standpoint, is that there are TOO MANY CHURCHES. There is not a lack of God fearing people in either locale - the problem is they fear the local thugs MORE - and this you do not understand.

Finally, I have stated in before, but let me state it again, directly: Your analysis fails - Philadelphia (and the State of PA) IS a CCP and OCP State/locale. The neighbors ARE armed. It is not working and Philadelphia has some of the worst gun crime in the Nation.

I do not mean any disrespect, but you truly do not understand the culture, no matter how much you have traveled. What you fail to understand, is that people have to live there. It’s nice to wax poetic about law abiding, God fearing people, banding together to fight the thugs - unfortunately, they have to also live there at night and you have no idea what that is like. Disputes here, even the slightest, can end in death or serious misadventure.

It’s easy for you to say, band together, fight crime. It’s quite another to rest your head, and that of your children, in the same neighborhood where you are forced to coexist with those who share little regard for life.

Push, what follows is not internet bravado, our past differences aside. In “real life”, I am a bad motherfucker. I fear no one, with or without a weapon. I’ve NEVER been beaten in a fight and I came out even the time I was attacked by more than one. I have been the “thug”. And I have been and remain the guy willing to take it one step farther than the next guy, consequences be damned. I have and will never be a victim. Pull a knife, and I’ll hit you in your head with a bat. Threaten me with a gun, and I’ll have your house burned down. If I can’t beat you, I’ll use a weapon. I’m not bragging, only coloring the following: I walk across the street from my social club and I don’t even hold eye contact with the young ones hanging around. I’m not afraid of them. I can kick the shit out of them from one end of the block to the other. I can arm myself. I can do everything I mentioned earlier in this paragraph…and one thing is certain - it will NOT end until someone is dead. It could be me. It could be one of my best friends, who would be completely innocent - but they’d go after him anyway for “being with me”. So I avoid any verbal confrontation, and any “hard stares” that might lead to it. I’m not meek. I don’t avoid eye contact. I don’t sneak around. But you do not play in these streets here…and the neighbors don’t either. You don’t “witness” around here. And you don’t interfere either.

I agree with your sensibilities, I truly do and it’s somewhat difficult to oppose you - we want the same things. But this is a different world my friend and it’s not something you can learn from a paper, or traveling, or visiting. You have to exist within it, navigate it daily, to understand it.

Your platitude about neighbors banding together is a fantasy. Not everyone is built like us. There are entire blocks with single mothers, the elderly. Many able males in prison, or being thugs. Anyone with enough money and common sense, moves out of the danger zones. Sure, decent people remain, but they abide by the street culture that you don’t seem to understand - you mind your own business or you (or someone you love) end up dead.

This is reality. Until we have that drink…

Push, you quoted a lot of men from long ago. None of them from modern day Philadelphia, New York, LA, our smaller crime ridden cities, etc.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
Push, you quoted a lot of men from long ago. None of them from modern day Philadelphia, New York, LA, our smaller crime ridden cities, etc.[/quote]

I basically said I had to agree with you in my last post. If the people of Philly, NY, LA etc. don’t exhibit the values that these “men from long ago” espoused then yes, they might not deserve the precious inalienable right to keep and bear arms and maybe it should be redefined as a “privilege” FOR THEM.

How’s that for a concession? Looks like you win.[/quote]

I’m not sure it’s a “win”…just a different perspective. Our values are the same. And I don’t think that they don’t have the values. I think people in many neighborhoods are outnumbered by urban terrorist. And believe me, it’s a form of terrorism.

I don’t know the answer - so you win too. Fair enough? :slight_smile:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

This is reality. Until we have that drink…[/quote]

Sounds like you need to get outta Dodge.

http://www.expedia.com/Flights-Search?trip=roundtrip&leg1=from:philadelphia,to:fca,departure:6%2F14%2F2011TANYT&leg2=from:fca,to:philadelphia,departure:6%2F21%2F2011TANYT&passengers=children:0,adults:1,seniors:0,infantinlap:Y&options=cabinclass:coach,nopenalty:N,sortby:price&mode=search&rfrr=-429[/quote]

LOL I do live “outta Dodge” now. I’m 30 minutes from the shit, sitting on a nice piece of private land, on a dead end road, in a nice small town where, unfortunately every knows everyone’s business. Just me, my 5 year old boy and my prized hunting dogs. My social club however, and two of my closest friends, are right smack dab in the middle of the danger zone - “pollock town” Camden NJ. I’ve seen and been part of enough violence for 10 lifetimes or more and I don’t like it. I’m tired of seeing violence. I don’t like to read about it, see it on the news or, view these increasingly popular youtube clips of someone getting their ass kicked. I don’t like to see people hurt and I certainly don’t want someone to put me in the position to hurt them. I just want to live and be left alone. I just want peace.

LOL @ Carpenters. I’ve always said if they want to keep murders down in the “hood” all they have to do is keep the temperature at 20 degrees. Now I’m thinking that adding a Carpenters soundtrack on continue loop might help as well. It’s impossible to be angry listening to that shit LOL.

I changed my mind PUSH. The right to worship, assemble to worship etc. SHOULD be a privilege and by permit only. As evidence of my position, I offer the following:

I’m saying this tongue-in-cheek (kinda). This nonsense has caused some people alarm. There are billboards across the country. It scares children. This nonsense is like a fucking computer virus. These zealots and charlatans should be held accountable.

My job is actually 3 minutes from where this all went down, I’ve talked to a few guys from the district and where it went down is kind of a shady spot If I was in that officer’s shoes (especially in this city) I would have probably reacted the same way due to the simple fact of where it was and how many cops have been killed the past few years here. Only time I really see open carry is a cop off duty on his way to or from work… and they are still in uniform pants usually.

[quote]Paul215 wrote:
My job is actually 3 minutes from where this all went down, I’ve talked to a few guys from the district and where it went down is kind of a shady spot If I was in that officer’s shoes (especially in this city) I would have probably reacted the same way due to the simple fact of where it was and how many cops have been killed the past few years here. Only time I really see open carry is a cop off duty on his way to or from work… and they are still in uniform pants usually. [/quote]

OK so I live in the boonies, so it’s not at all clear to me but… do gangbangers really open carry? In a holster, no less. It would seem that a guy with a holstered gun probably isn’t a criminal and doesn’t warrant being treated like one.

Pig should’ve tried a calmer approach unless he likes the national negative attention. Previously I had no opinion of Philly cops but now I think they are at the same level as violent criminals (i.e. the lowest form of human life).

doesn’t need to be a “gangbanger” (haven’t heard that term in a while) could also have been an insane person i.e- the guy that shot Congresswoman Giffords.

[quote]grettiron wrote:

[quote]Paul215 wrote:
My job is actually 3 minutes from where this all went down, I’ve talked to a few guys from the district and where it went down is kind of a shady spot If I was in that officer’s shoes (especially in this city) I would have probably reacted the same way due to the simple fact of where it was and how many cops have been killed the past few years here. Only time I really see open carry is a cop off duty on his way to or from work… and they are still in uniform pants usually. [/quote]

OK so I live in the boonies, so it’s not at all clear to me but… do gangbangers really open carry? In a holster, no less. It would seem that a guy with a holstered gun probably isn’t a criminal and doesn’t warrant being treated like one.

Pig should’ve tried a calmer approach unless he likes the national negative attention. Previously I had no opinion of Philly cops but now I think they are at the same level as violent criminals (i.e. the lowest form of human life). [/quote]

I’m not doing a good job of illustrating this apparently or you wouldn’t have asked the above. Apparently, OCP is legal. I say “apparently” as a lifelong reside in and around the City who is “pro-gun” himself. That is how FAR removed OCP is in the City - you do not see it. The sight is alarming. It’s so unusual, the cop didn’t even know the technical law. Was the cop ignorant of the law? Yes, obviously…but his reaction is clear evidence of just how unusual the practice of OCP is.

I stopped by the old club where I worked last night to briefly chat with my buddy the owner. He’s leaning over my car window, talking and he’s OCP. He’s right outside his business. That itself is not that unusual. And it’s not unusual given the ACT 235 laws in the State either - the club has a few armed security. However, for some regularly moe, walking about a neighborhood, gun on hip, is not our custom.

You’re not entirely wrong here though; Philly cops can be violent criminals themselves. I can confirm that for you without hesitation and by direct experience and knowledge. And I’m the guy defending this cop in this instance. Ponder that for a moment.