Is this another bombshell? How many ways will you tell me you’re turned on by fiat systems without actually describing how you would apply one?
Oh.
Please answer the questions before asking diversions. This is your question to answer. I’m all ears.
Where, though? You’ve never gone deeper than the current exchange, which has only taught me that you evidently view the existence of fiat systems as illuminating information. I hate to tell you this, but it’s mainstream knowledge. And in institutionalized academia, Watson.
You’re welcome for throwing limited resource in there for you to ponder. I was really hoping to hear your open ended reply but you can have that one. Please, again, elaborate on that broad fiscal landscape.
Can we define “fine” and “selfish motherfucker”? I would like to know the basis we are confirming/accusing from for context.
The majority as opposed to what, exactly?
Last time, I’m paraphrasing, you said “I don’t have the answer, I just know something different is needed” or some shit like that.
I take it this is still the case? You don’t have an idea, you’re just mad?
The powers that be sure act like it, otherwise why would they ask “How ya gonna pay for it?” And it’s not just politicians, turn on any of the corporate media. I just heard D-bag Musk say that the country is going bankrupt. It can’t asshole. This fuckin’ guy has no idea what he is talking about when it comes to macroeconomics.
It’s already being applied, pay attention so I don’t have to keep saying the same thing. The fiat system has no problem paying endless amounts of money for wars but when it comes to social spending it’s “How ya gonna pay for it?” Funny how that is never a stumbling block for war.
Really, Watson! Then why are most positions taken economically from a gold-standard/fixed exchange rate P.O.V.? You know “How ya gonna pay for it?”
If spending is not governed by taxes then…
Well in your posts you’ve shown no sympathy towards others. You just have the attitude of Fuck you; I got mine.
I’m asking how you would apply a fiat monetary system, not if we are already living in one.
Speaking of saying the same thing, this is not only not a revelation, but mainstream academia. You trailblazer.
Yes, really. Saying the same thing again, it’s taught in mainstream academia even.
Go on…
And so can you, if you quit waiting for the handout that isn’t coming. Do you know who I reward? People in real life, who understand the value of work and do it.
Clever.
So anyways, still a bunch of nothing. I get the impression you watch a bunch of clips you don’t really understand and try your best to parrot but can’t.
He can best be described as an “alt” economist. Economics is largely theory, and to his credit he discusses/introduces interesting ones but also will rehash commonly accepted theory as a twist and it can be annoying. It creates Castolis.
For example someone could say “to turn your car left, pull the steering wheel left”
And he would say “it’s actually false that you would turn the wheel left to turn left, first you must decide to turn left”.
Not wrong but not useful either.
He found a niche being different though, and developed a following. Most of his theory is untested.
I still just want you to answer the original questions. I think we are like 40 deflections in at this point, and I’m asking for your explanations of your ideas. Are you able?