And deadly and disease causing.
It specifically discussed two things. Inconclusiveness and that the data being analyzed was for Medicare/Medicaid supplemental insurance specifically . You have to listen for it. Supplemental insurance complimenting federal programs are a completely different ballgame than the inference United is unabashedly denying claims unethically or even illegally.
1 Like
1 Like
I thought it was the government who subsidized things?
Especially in the U.S. Why is that?
Man, Iād certainly be down to see someone off one of those greedy bastards, who like all in this garbage industry, profit from suffering and death,
How about Romney as he implemented it first in whatever state he was the governor in? I think it was Mass.
How about the douchebags in The Heritage Foundation who first came up with the dumb right-wing policy?
You know you can avoid the whole industry, right? You donāt, depending on the state in which you live, have to carry health insurance, and you never have to seek treatment. If youāre unable to avoid the āgarbage industry,ā itās because you donāt want to. And thatās why everything you post about it is ridiculous.
2 Likes
So expecting healthcare to be about healthcare and not place profit as itās primary concern is too much to ask? Now who is ridiculous?
Expecting someone else to care for you is stupid. You are, and an idiot.
2 Likes
So if you need a doctor, you are stupid?
If you believe a doctor should be forced to labor for you, you are stupid.
However, it could make sense to question rates.
And, by forcing hospitals and other healthcare systems to post prices and eliminate obfuscated billing practices it would allow regulations other industries see such as price collusion prevention.
And now youāre on the right track to address healthcare costs, the reduction of which will also lower insurance costs, because the pressure on their money in/money out ratio will lighten. And, we live in a competitive market in the US, so companies will look for greater market share with reduced prices as a tool in the acquisition bag.
This doesnāt work in single pay, socialized care systems however. Which is why patients actually pay more, as a percentage of care, out of pocket. As linked and discussed above.
There is zero incentive to push efficiency by politicians who went to great law schools but couldnāt balance a budget to win an election (hello, Kamala). And this is one area where socialized programs, and their efficiency of care along with budget efficiency begin to fail.
The macroeconomic tie-in has already been discussed above as well.
The issue is greater than parroted quips youāve heard thrown around.
I recommend reading for comprehension and understanding. And if you legitimately disagree with anything then, then fine. But drop the identity politics bullshit and know what youāre advocating for where the rubber meets the road.
2 Likes
I wonder how all those doctors in other countries feel under the yoke of forced labor are handling it?
Ah no, we live in an oligarchy loaded with oligopolies.
Sounds like a great campaign subject to run on.
Do you even know what identity politics are? Because I donāt think you do.
Bwahahahahaā¦ you think this will stop āhealthcareā insurance from making profits their primary concern to please Wall Street? Man, you are more gullible than I thought.
Budgets donāt need to be balanced, especially on the federal level.
Didnāt know I was speaking to someone who lives in the stone age.
Thereās no way youāre dumb enough to think thatās even remotely close to what I said but are still able to find this forum everyday.
Exactly!
Wait, what?
I think we found the problem, lol.
Iām going back to ignoring you.
2 Likes
Try reading instead of following!
Try engaging and informing instead of asking rhetorical questions, deflection, and evasion. Njord knows his shit.
You might find it refreshing.
3 Likes
Do you really want that?
I want to see if he can learn to back up his stuff, or if his only tool is passive-agressive logical fallices.
Iām treating him like a social-media lab rat.
Until then, I agree with the fact that he is retarded.
Bwahahahahaā¦ Like thinking all of the studies that shows the U.S. āhealthcareā system to be the most expensive to actually costing less? And the information that those studies reference prove it to be so. Playing dumb and being subservient to the āfree marketā system is his forte. Make any excuse to try and validate the system is the name of the game. Man, GTFOH.
You sucked me in again. Please revisit ratios.
Youāve actually made my point though.
Americans do pay less as a percentage of total cost, because our insurance market covers more than the socialized single pay systems you like.
But we do pay more overall because our healthcare costs are higher. They are very high. So high virtually nobody can afford them.
Cue cost ratios, money in vs money out and even medical tourism. And read the article again, for comprehension. Then go back through your own thread.
The only people who benefit from single pay and govt regulated systems are the welfare recipients not contributing back. Moochers. And Iāve gathered this is your siren song. And yes, they do benefit.
For the rest of us, addressing healthcare costs is the key.
Cueing I think the very first post, theyāre the cost leader.
It really would behoove you to try to understand, then disagree. If you still do.
1 Like