Yes. And now we can reintroduce socialized care ![]()
Circular reasoning?..
Well, a segue to some of the documented problems in those systems. Shit care.
Maybe baby jesus was playing 4D chess, and this was his ultimate goal lol.
lol.
I just mean systemization of care via govt oversight and budgeting methodologies is an exhibited problem for quality of care.
Govt oversight is the shite dispenser. As a guy who was alive during the fake (sarcasm) moon landing, whateverdafuck happened to NASA?
A budgeting methodology is required to maintain a viable company. Itās the lack of flexibility and maneuverability that comes with the rigid ratio aspect that is at fault. Prime example being all agencies with a āsurplusā will just throw the money overboard rather than have a surplus because with the govt, it just means the agencyās budget will get cut for being efficient/profitable.
Heās getting his rectum stretched bro⦠deal with it. Maybe some of your soy friends can break him out.
Imagine if the leftoids actually get the violence theyāre cheering on⦠oof. A bigger pummeling than this election.
But I like humming above natural and got there via the āquality of lifeā questionnaire vs blood work so thereās that.
If telling yourself that makes you feel better, thereās that.
With the added factor that they have all the stats that show the probability of your getting sick, and can price accordingly. (actuarial science)
Where I work, we have choices when it comes to plans however, we all pay the same amount for a given plan. A healthier person like me pays as much as one of the many unhealthy, even very unhealthy, coworkers I have. So with these group plans, do they look at stats with the group in mind? Do they figure a certain percentage will be obese, a certain number will have a disease that needs management and a certain number will actually eat healthy and take care of themselves?
If telling yourself that makes you feel better, thereās that.
To really blow your mind sometimes Iāll add other compounds too.
But youāve mentioned you donāt even lift, so I wouldnāt expect you understand. Itās ok.
Iām sure you flip through William Blake poems with a very firm wrist, when youāre not oddly on a bodybuilding forum looking for attention. Which is kind of cute. Youāll find your man one day, I believe in you.
Translation: you have a limp dick.
So with these group plans, do they look at stats with the group in mind?
(I suck at math, so I stick to the simple, basic concepts.)
Yes. The larger the group (sample size), the more accuracy to the projections. To continue the betting analogy, blackjack counting can fail miserably over a 100 hands, but the more hands you play, the more certain the outcome of winning against someone that is not counting cards.
I donāt think you understand how these things work, lol. Par for the course I guess.
Nice.
I just watched a Ralph Fiennes movie the other night.
It looks like many on the left support the murderer and believe that this should happen more often. They are advocating for violent revolution. I took these screenshots from the leftist echo-chamber, Reddit.
One thing we know from history is that when it comes to revolutions, the bad guys have a good track record of winning.
One thing we know from history is that when it comes to revolutions, the bad guys have a good track record of winning.
Whatever window the USA had for a leftist revolution has passed, in my opinion. They couldnāt keep their lies up long enough to become permanently entrenched, and the whole thing is kind of falling apart as we speak.
I have people I know in town saying the same kind of shit, but they are weak people.
Weāve been on a precipice if not in a full on culture war for at least a decade.
Itās hard to document aggregated data around sentiment but you could feel a shift following the housing market crash and in to BLM and DEI narratives; or underdogs outside the majority vs the democratic norm.
Special interest āresearchā and PR ramped up, data and fact took a back seat to sentiment and dialogue momentum and we started moving away from topics like equality of opportunity in to equity specifically, as it relates to this bend.
People were taught to be victims and demand govt mediated wealth distribution vs earning, and many digested it.
So we are at a place of haves and have nots, and many see themselves as incapable of pushing their own cart, clearly with violence against people who do as the answer.
I donāt think they know what theyāre asking for. Itās almost like they hold a fantastical view of historical revolutions and breaking out of serfdom in their head, vs learning how to open a business or become valuable enough for a high paying corporate role, which they can do. Starting like right now.
Their hero wasnāt even a United client, for the record. He was a BCBS client. He also received treatment for his many health concerns and seemingly did not have any claims denied. He even praised his spine surgery as life saving. Heās now most likely going to be incarcerated for murder as a high profile pretty boy, who everybody knows is physically weak given his publicly displayed health problems. Guy is about to be a cock sleeve for the rest of his life.
Meanwhile, United still exists, a new CEO will replace him, and objective fact will still be in place despite the opinions of the uneducated and intentionally obtuse.
So what is the revolution, exactly? And how are targets defined?
The same crowd making these posts were likely the people rioting and burning mom and pop businesses in hometowns too, or looting box stores and family owned shops alike.
There were physical attacks on shop owners and seemingly wealthy white people and potentially violently charged marches through nice neighborhoods.
One off shootings wonāt change a thing, except maybe security detail assignments and diligence.
A massive act of violence would be required because we arenāt consolidated like middle aged kingdoms, at least not by the apparent definitions of recent events. So we have to include shop owners, deli owners, plumbers, electricians, lawyers, business owners, doctors, and really anybody earning low six figures as an entry definition and up, as theyāre in the top 10% and collectively hold over half the wealth in the country.
Even if something did kick off, I foresee a lot of dead ANTIFA fuckheads who bit off more than they understood, ironically. Especially in specific regions.
If anything kicks off it will be more riots in places with spineless DSA leadership that encourages it.
They know not what they fuck with outside of their little enclaves. It wouldnāt take much for people who already have their lives organized to become more organized in whatever kind of fight might take shape.
It will remain a personal fantasy of the cult members, bitterly clinging to their socialism, DEI and puberty blockers.
For sure. And one off murders will be viewed as guerilla warfare, with zero net change to their quality of life.
Anecdotally, Texas at large was pretty mild during all the unrest. Especially for its population volume and relative urban racial diversity, which is surprisingly extremely high. Double especially Houston. We had marches and some broken skyscraper windows but the protests actually were largely peaceful, except one in Dallas where a BLM guy shot cops and then got blown up by a grenade robot.
But everybody knows youāre probably going to get shot if you start menacing somebody here. Not interested in debating the merits of defense again as a tangent, itās just the sentiment here. I think we defined FAFO before it was a thing. As a matter of fact, ācome and take itā from our revolution ushering our existence is probably the father of that.
Austin itself was a good example. The uber driver inadvertently routed through an Antifa rally on an Uber mapped trip who was approached by an AK-47 immediately shot the guy. Unfortunately he was in Austin and narrative politics ruled the day, but my point is the sentiment. You donāt threaten people here without at least a thought in the back of your head that thereās a very real possibility youāre getting shot. Itās just how it is. And people play nice.
The Austin protests occurred in a very young, liberal section of the city. Near UT but not yuppie. Intentionally anti-yuppie but kids living on mom and dad money all the same.
You never them saw them spread to the wealthy areas, and there are many. Lots of conservative money in Austin, just not a winning amount. Prime targets totally ignored.
And if a real revolution kicked off the rest of Texas would show up and it would be a duck hunt.
Maine was very mild too, with some peaceful marches but none of them got any crazy ideas like they did in other places. I observed the George Floyd BLM march in my town to watch out for a good friend participating in it, only to make sure she was safe if things got squirrely. It was kind of fun, my liberal BJJ coach was there with me too. Somewhat sadly, there were no chances to apply what we know how to do.
Constitutional carry got passed right before the great DSA takeover in 2018, and they hate it. Maineās Constitution itself is quite problematic for gun control efforts, as it is completely unambiguous.
I donāt think thatās any coincidence why our batshit crazy leftists stayed mostly peaceful. They arenāt that dumb.


