Pentagon Video

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
81

[quote]doogie wrote:
So you didn’t bother going to the CNN site and watching the original video from 9/11? The quotes I posted aren’t just him explaining things last week, it shows the FULL clip of his report on 9/11 that your stupid conspiracy site edits down to make it appear to say something it doesn’t.

Your stupid conspiracy video just shows this part:

MCINTYRE: But from my close-up inspection, there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.

What he actually said was:

MCINTYRE: But from my close-up inspection, there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual site of the building that’s crashed in. And, as I said…

Are you too lazy or too afraid to go watch the original report and admit your stupid link is full of shit?
[/quote]

Are you mental? YOU obviously didn’t even watch the clip I posted. The only thing taken out of context is McIntyre’s own explanation of what he meant on 9/11 since he stops his own clip SHORT.

The full clip I posted says…

MCINTYRE: From my close-up inspection, there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere NEAR [his emphasis] the Pentagon.

The only site, is the actual side of the building that’s crashed in. And as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.

Even though if you look at the pictures of the Pentagon you see that the floors have all collapsed, that didn’t happen immediately. It wasn’t until almost about 45 minutes later that the structure was weakened enough that all of the floors collapsed.
http://thewebfairy.com/911/pentagon/27_1-mcintyre.swf

Kinda hard to convince someone that the people who don’t believe a 757 crashed into the Pentagon are bat-shit crazy – by showing a new video clip of a partial blurry white streak, followed up by a video from the morning of 9/11 with the anchor saying I don’t see any evidence of a 100 ton plane.

Being called crazy for refusing to see something that isn’t there – classic.

82

[quote]metalsluggx wrote:
Oh oh!

“I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons.” 10/13/2001

Bin Laden says in an interview, "I have already said that I am not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States. [/quote]

He’s actually quoting Bin Laden! As if that means something…

WAHAHAHAA…Oh please do more!!!

This thread just gets better and better…

:slight_smile:

83

[quote]ZEB wrote:
I love you conspiracy theory guys. Please keep posting. When I have a hard day I just click over to your latest nutty thread and break out in laughter.

(Banging hands on table and belly laughing)

Again…many thanks.

Please continue…[/quote]

LOL

84

[quote]ZEB wrote:
He’s actually quoting Bin Laden! As if that means something…
[/quote]

Quoting Bin Laden as if it means something…hmmmm.

Quoting the vaguely identified figurehead, the single reason for going to WAR, as if it means something.

A person who is identified in promoting the attacks in staged (faux) videos, yet ACTUALLY denounces the attacks to the Arab media days after. WHY WOULD HE DO THAT?

The same guy who is seemingly responsible for creating a crack A-Team (on record by aviation professionals) who couldn’t fly or even attempt a landing maneuver with a single engine plane (while performing maneuvers aviation controllers viewed entirely as military craft.)

Which in the first time in history destroyed 3 steel skyscrapers with 2 planes, all through fire melting steel (there are past incidents with far worst fires with no collapse), with all necessary information to put this all to rest destroyed illegally.

I’m quoting the guy (as if it even means something) whose team flew a disappearing aircraft into an impossibly small hole into the pentagon (after performing military degree maneuvers.)

The United States of America spent pennies on the investigations of 9/11 compared to the millions of dollars investigating Clintons blow job.
Obviously a serious effort, obviously.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
WAHAHAHAA…Oh please do more!!!

This thread just gets better and better…

:slight_smile:
[/quote]

You’re very emotionally attached to disagreements in which you decree ludicrous, which is funny (WAHAHA, I’ll add) considering you belong in a dissenting group of people who believe (as a fact) in the Ark (single file, single file! elephants you in the back! alligators you in the front!) and intelligent design.

Zogby polls shows over 65% of New Yorkers want 9/11 reinvestigated.

85

[quote]metalsluggx wrote:
ZEB wrote:
He’s actually quoting Bin Laden! As if that means something…

Quoting Bin Laden as if it means something…hmmmm.

Quoting the vaguely identified figurehead, the single reason for going to WAR, as if it means something.

A person who is identified in promoting the attacks in staged (faux) videos, yet ACTUALLY denounces the attacks to the Arab media days after. WHY WOULD HE DO THAT?

The same guy who is seemingly responsible for creating a crack A-Team (on record by aviation professionals) who couldn’t fly or even attempt a landing maneuver with a single engine plane (while performing maneuvers aviation controllers viewed entirely as military craft.)

Which in the first time in history destroyed 3 steel skyscrapers with 2 planes, all through fire melting steel (there are past incidents with far worst fires with no collapse), with all necessary information to put this all to rest destroyed illegally.

I’m quoting the guy (as if it even means something) whose team flew a disappearing aircraft into an impossibly small hole into the pentagon (after performing military degree maneuvers.)

The United States of America spent pennies on the investigations of 9/11 compared to the millions of dollars investigating Clintons blow job.
Obviously a serious effort, obviously.

[/quote]

LMAO!

YES…YES! :slight_smile:

This is what I want…more of this!

For some reason on this post I could actually picture you sitting in front of your computer with your tin foil hat on BANGING on the keys…

(Good imagery)

I copied this post and some of your others and showed my wife and a few of her friends who were over.

They (I’m chucking as I write this) wanted to know if you were “some sort of bored teenager.”

LOL

May I ask you to please continue?

86

[quote]ZEB wrote:
metalsluggx wrote:
ZEB wrote:
He’s actually quoting Bin Laden! As if that means something…

Quoting Bin Laden as if it means something…hmmmm.

Quoting the vaguely identified figurehead, the single reason for going to WAR, as if it means something.

A person who is identified in promoting the attacks in staged (faux) videos, yet ACTUALLY denounces the attacks to the Arab media days after. WHY WOULD HE DO THAT?

The same guy who is seemingly responsible for creating a crack A-Team (on record by aviation professionals) who couldn’t fly or even attempt a landing maneuver with a single engine plane (while performing maneuvers aviation controllers viewed entirely as military craft.)

Which in the first time in history destroyed 3 steel skyscrapers with 2 planes, all through fire melting steel (there are past incidents with far worst fires with no collapse), with all necessary information to put this all to rest destroyed illegally.

I’m quoting the guy (as if it even means something) whose team flew a disappearing aircraft into an impossibly small hole into the pentagon (after performing military degree maneuvers.)

The United States of America spent pennies on the investigations of 9/11 compared to the millions of dollars investigating Clintons blow job.
Obviously a serious effort, obviously.

LMAO!

YES…YES! :slight_smile:

This is what I want…more of this!

For some reason on this post I could actually picture you sitting in front of your computer with your tin foil hat on BANGING on the keys…

(Good imagery)

I copied this post and some of your others and showed my wife and a few of her friends who were over.

They (I’m chucking as I write this) wanted to know if you were “some sort of bored teenager.”

LOL

May I ask you to please continue?
[/quote]

Show em’ this while your at it and see if they can guess what’s missing…

http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm

87

Correct us on any part we are wrong.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
LMAO!

YES…YES! :slight_smile:

This is what I want…more of this!

For some reason on this post I could actually picture you sitting in front of your computer with your tin foil hat on BANGING on the keys…

(Good imagery)

I copied this post and some of your others and showed my wife and a few of her friends who were over.

They (I’m chucking as I write this) wanted to know if you were “some sort of bored teenager.”

LOL

May I ask you to please continue?
[/quote]

88

[quote]metalsluggx wrote:
PGJ wrote:
Well said. Here’s a thought:

How do we know Lincoln freed the slave? How do we know there was Civil War? All those pictures and personal letters could be fake. Does Sweden REALLY exist? I’ve never been there so I have no real proof it exists. Did Kennedy really get shot? I wasn’t there, so who knows? What about Alamo? Anyone remember the Alamo?

Hitler must have been a hoax also because I wasn’t there either.

Hummm…what else? Caesar Agustus…fake. David Hasselhoff, never met him so he’s not real. Richard Simmons…I actually met him. Very nice guy. He’s unbelievable, but real. The Dallas Cowboys didn’t really win 5 Superbowls. I saw 2 of them on TV, but I wasn’t there.

If you weren’t there then there’s no proof, right? That’s at least 5th time n the last 3 days some liberal freak has said something to the effect that if I (you, the lib in question) don’t personally know every fact, have total unfiltered accest to every piece of evidence, then it’s fake or a cover-up. A big scandal.

Your relating events which are entirely separate in their: public source of information, desire (or need) to be altered (faked misinformed,) also known as purpose (the idea that your argument is VOID of), for example (because you need an example) who in power would want to realistically (right now is only reality don’t forget that) change the facts about Lincoln or Caesar. No one.

If purely and entirely by chance, and if only by at least a seldom known precedent in affairs, 9/11 was a planned ‘objective’ from a powerful group residing in this entire world (if such a group could ever, at least somehow manage to actually exist [sarcasm] in this world,) and be closely affiliated to this administration, would maybe rather choose to deliberately alter information about their own ‘assumed’ undertakings, rather than as your example, Caesars past.

PGJ wrote:
You people (skeptics) are truly amazing. Do you honestly believe the crap you spew?

To accept your theories, you would have to believe that the people you consider totally incompetent are actually the most organized and well prepared people on the planet. Sun Tsu in “The Art of War” says in order to feign chaos, you must have complete control.

Sun Tzu is reknown from accurately predicting and advising conflicting forces and remains habitually correct to this very day.

[/quote]

Dude…huh??? You want to try that again? That made no sense.

89

[quote]metalsluggx wrote:
Correct us on any part we are wrong.

ZEB wrote:
LMAO!

YES…YES! :slight_smile:

This is what I want…more of this!

For some reason on this post I could actually picture you sitting in front of your computer with your tin foil hat on BANGING on the keys…

(Good imagery)

I copied this post and some of your others and showed my wife and a few of her friends who were over.

They (I’m chucking as I write this) wanted to know if you were “some sort of bored teenager.”

LOL

May I ask you to please continue?

[/quote]

We’ve been doing it the whole time. Haven’t you been paying attention? The problem is, you are willing to believe ANYTHING that says the government is bad. ANYTHING!

Hey, did you know Goerge Bush was part of Kennedy’s murder? A guy in Dallas told me. Do the research, man. He was there.

That big tsunami…President Bush, along with a secret group of US Marines planted a nuclear bomb at the bottom of the ocean and caused the tidal wave. Then the US could go in to those Muslim nations that got wiped out with aid and look good so his popularity points would go up?

Everything is a conspiracy. Nothing is as it seems.

(taking tin-foil hat off now)

90

[quote]yweb.commetalsluggx wrote:
Correct us on any part we are wrong.[/quote]

Noooooo way!

Why would you ever think that I want you to stop this?

I want more. :slight_smile:

When you guys do eventually get bored with this I have some other suggestions for you:

UFO abductions. Title it “They took me while I slept” would be a good title.

See there’s a web site and an entire organization set up to look into this very serious matter. :slight_smile:

LBJ the real man behind the Kennedy assassination.

(See another web site…must be true.)

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/TV/11/19/tv.johnson.jfk.ap/

How America never really landed a man on the moon. It was faked on a Hollywood set.

http://www.primeline-america.com/moon-ldg/

I took this little gem right off the site. Now…how in the world can anyone explain this?

AHA!

“Why are there never any stars showing in any of the moon pictures? If the Hubble Telescope can see them, why can’t the Astro-Nots?”

I’M TELLING YOU THERE’S A COVER-UP!

WE NEED ANSWERS AND I INTEND TO GET THEM!

Will you two geniuses please investigate these cover-ups? You are doing such a good…(lol) job with the whole 9-11 thingy…

IT’S TIME THE WORLD BECAME AWARE OF THE COVER UP!

UFO’s!
Kennedy!
Fake Moon Landing!

And now…9-11!

I HATE THESE FREAKING COVER-UPS! ALL WASHINGTON DOES IS COVER THINGS UP. THOSE LYING SACKS OF POOP!

(WAHHAHAH…HEE HEE…I’m almost falling off my chair…no …really…PHEW. fun stuff!)

I have been on this web site for a few years now and I am telling you the truth.I have never enjoyed a thread more!

Please write back soon…

91

[quote]PGJ wrote:
metalsluggx wrote:
Correct us on any part we are wrong.

ZEB wrote:
LMAO!

YES…YES! :slight_smile:

This is what I want…more of this!

For some reason on this post I could actually picture you sitting in front of your computer with your tin foil hat on BANGING on the keys…

(Good imagery)

I copied this post and some of your others and showed my wife and a few of her friends who were over.

They (I’m chucking as I write this) wanted to know if you were “some sort of bored teenager.”

LOL

May I ask you to please continue?

We’ve been doing it the whole time. Haven’t you been paying attention? The problem is, you are willing to believe ANYTHING that says the government is bad. ANYTHING!

Hey, did you know Goerge Bush was part of Kennedy’s murder? A guy in Dallas told me. Do the research, man. He was there.[/quote]

HOW DID YOU FREAKING KNOW THAT?

It must have come from this web site huh?

http://www.tomflocco.com/fs/FbiMemoPhotoLinkBushJfk.htm

Okay…okay before you laugh can YOU prove this wrong?

AHHAHAHAHAHAHHA…(My eyes are tearing up)

It’s the Internet I think.
But then there were nut bags around before that…Oh well…let’s just hope they keep going.

[quote]That big tsunami…President Bush, along with a secret group of US Marines planted a nuclear bomb at the bottom of the ocean and caused the tidal wave. Then the US could go in to those Muslim nations that got wiped out with aid and look good so his popularity points would go up?

Everything is a conspiracy. Nothing is as it seems.

(taking tin-foil hat off now)

[/quote]

92

[quote]JustTheFacts wrote:

http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm
[/quote]

Why weren’t you honest enough to post the page that includes ALL of the most wanted terrorists and this information:

The alleged terrorists on this list have been indicted by sitting Federal Grand Juries in various jurisdictions in the United States for the crimes reflected on their wanted posters. Evidence was gathered and presented to the Grand Juries, which led to their being charged. The indictments currently listed on the posters allow them to be arrested and brought to justice. Future indictments may be handed down as various investigations proceed in connection to other terrorist incidents, for example, the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.

http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/fugitives.htm

93

[quote]ZEB wrote:
PGJ wrote:
metalsluggx wrote:
Correct us on any part we are wrong.

ZEB wrote:
LMAO!

YES…YES! :slight_smile:

This is what I want…more of this!

For some reason on this post I could actually picture you sitting in front of your computer with your tin foil hat on BANGING on the keys…

(Good imagery)

I copied this post and some of your others and showed my wife and a few of her friends who were over.

They (I’m chucking as I write this) wanted to know if you were “some sort of bored teenager.”

LOL

May I ask you to please continue?

We’ve been doing it the whole time. Haven’t you been paying attention? The problem is, you are willing to believe ANYTHING that says the government is bad. ANYTHING!

Hey, did you know Goerge Bush was part of Kennedy’s murder? A guy in Dallas told me. Do the research, man. He was there.

HOW DID YOU FREAKING KNOW THAT?

It must have come from this web site huh?

http://www.tomflocco.com/fs/FbiMemoPhotoLinkBushJfk.htm

Okay…okay before you laugh can YOU prove this wrong?

AHHAHAHAHAHAHHA…(My eyes are tearing up)

It’s the Internet I think.
But then there were nut bags around before that…Oh well…let’s just hope they keep going.

That big tsunami…President Bush, along with a secret group of US Marines planted a nuclear bomb at the bottom of the ocean and caused the tidal wave. Then the US could go in to those Muslim nations that got wiped out with aid and look good so his popularity points would go up?

Everything is a conspiracy. Nothing is as it seems.

(taking tin-foil hat off now)

[/quote]

Holy crap, ZEB! You da’ man! I just made that shit up trying to be funny. Freaky. THis whole conspiracy thing is nothing more than a bunch of bored pseudointellectuals trying to be different. Very sad.

94

As long as there are billions of dollars to earn I won’t believe in the government’s innocence.

Btw funny time to release that video after people were getting suspicious about the Pentagon attack…

95

[quote]ZEB wrote:
I copied this post and some of your others and showed my wife and a few of her friends who were over.

They (I’m chucking as I write this) wanted to know if you were “some sort of bored teenager.”
[/quote]

No offense, but that is really sad.

96

[quote]ill wrote:
As long as there are billions of dollars to earn I won’t believe in the government’s innocence.

Btw funny time to release that video after people were getting suspicious about the Pentagon attack…[/quote]

Funny time? You mean the end of the Moussaoui trial and the possibility of using it against him?

97

[quote]ill wrote:
As long as there are billions of dollars to earn I won’t believe in the government’s innocence.

Btw funny time to release that video after people were getting suspicious about the Pentagon attack…[/quote]

What about the books that are sold and noteriety to be had by talking about a conspiracy theory…

And when you talk about it enough you get nut jobs to talk about it on the Internet.

And then …I am entertained :slight_smile:

98

[quote]Sepukku wrote:
ZEB wrote:
I copied this post and some of your others and showed my wife and a few of her friends who were over.

They (I’m chucking as I write this) wanted to know if you were “some sort of bored teenager.”

No offense, but that is really sad.[/quote]

No actually it’s very amusing!

99

[quote]PGJ wrote:

Holy crap, ZEB! You da’ man! I just made that shit up trying to be funny. Freaky. THis whole conspiracy thing is nothing more than a bunch of bored pseudointellectuals trying to be different. Very sad.

[/quote]

There all kinds of web sites that will give you CLEAR CUT EVIDENCE of the most wacky theories that you can think of.

One of the techniques of the wacky theory club is to simply offer up a certain supposition.

For example: “Why is it that we never see stars during all of those moon photos.”

They then move to an erroneous conclusion to “close” their nutty theory case:

“Because it was really shot on a Hollywood set.”

The first thing you have to do is actually examine the supposition to begin with.

In reality there are many photos with stars in the background…

And furthermore, if they were shooting this in Hollywood what makes the nutty conspiracy theory folks think that stars cannot be faked?

I think I can find a web site to support just about any nutty theory that you can imagine.

It’s about money, noteriety and I think in the case of 9-11 politics. In fact, there may even be a push by the enemy to further these theories in an attempt to tear us apart from within. And might I add, it won’t work!

They are none the less very entertaining to me. And the more emphatic the theorist is, the funnier he is!

100

You really hate the Moon Landing conspirists, huh ZEB? :wink:

I notice that with every debate concerning the skepticism of the ‘norm’, you dismiss the lot as a bunch of retarded Moon Landing conspirists!

Well, seeing as this works you up so much, I will tell you that I am not a Moon Landing consipracy believer, and I hope you knowing there is one less potential thorn in your skin out there helps you sleep better at night!

My gift to you. :slight_smile: