Paris Attacks

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
41

[quote]Bismark wrote:
Given the national tragedy that France, our oldest ally, has suffered today, political quips are wholly tasteless. As president Obama stated, “This is an attack not just on Paris, it’s an attack not just on the people of France, but this is an attack on all of humanity and the universal values that we share.” Show a modicum of respect for those affected.[/quote]

I don’t think political quips are necessarily tasteless in this case but I do appreciate your sentiment.

I do not appreciate the Obama quote. It was not an attack on humanity it was an attack by Muslims on the Western way of life. This is very important to understand and not doing so, understanding and acknowledging, it is impossible to properly deal with the problem.

It doesn’t matter if it was ISIS or Al Qaeda or someone else, THEY WERE MUSLIMS. The Muslim religion is a religion of hate. This attack was small fries, just wait until they get nukes. They won’t hesitate to use them.

The current course the Muslim people are on and the current course the western world is on, as far as dealing with the Muslims, leads to the inescapable conclusion that we can say good bye to Israel, New York City, Chicago, Boston, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Seattle. This will happen in less than 100 years. I’ve probably got 30-40 years left. I hope I don’t see this happen but I’m not optimistic.

Our only hope is the Muslims keep up enough of these small fry attacks that the rest of the world wakes up to the severity of the threat and actually does something about it. Otherwise, like I said, it’s only a matter of time. Could be in just ten to fifteen years. Anyone who doesn’t know this is just living in denial.

42

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]idaho wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Typical PWI responses, just some facts

  • Al qaeda is the obvious first choice for blame on organized attacks outside of the region, not ISIL
  • If you factor this into a yearly death average gun control is still in the liberals favor in respects to Paris
  • Compared to our world population these death tolls are nothing, climate change is still unknown so it can’t be dismissed as a smaller problem.[/quote]

What a dumb fucking thing to type.[/quote]

What did you expect from a summa cum laude graduate of the University of Pittttbulll?
[/quote]

I always thought he was fine, but that post was about as classless as it gets.[/quote]

I just woke up to this news here in Afghanistan. My sincere condolences to the victims and their families. I have served alongside the French military and they are professional and courageous. May they hunt down and kill the cancerous filth that carried out this “holy war” massacre. Fucking cowards, may they roast in hell for eternity.

As for the comment above about the deaths meaning nothing on a world scale, You could say the same thing about the Twin Towers, nearly 3000 died, but, on a world scale that means nothing. However, I lost two brothers in that attack and I have never forgot, never, ever, will forgive. Someone lost a lover, child, wife, or husband during that attack, so it will always mean something to them. Fucking extremist filth.
[/quote]

Agreed, fuck extremists.[/quote]

The thing is they’re not extremists.

44

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]idaho wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Typical PWI responses, just some facts

  • Al qaeda is the obvious first choice for blame on organized attacks outside of the region, not ISIL
  • If you factor this into a yearly death average gun control is still in the liberals favor in respects to Paris
  • Compared to our world population these death tolls are nothing, climate change is still unknown so it can’t be dismissed as a smaller problem.[/quote]

What a dumb fucking thing to type.[/quote]

What did you expect from a summa cum laude graduate of the University of Pittttbulll?
[/quote]

I always thought he was fine, but that post was about as classless as it gets.[/quote]

I just woke up to this news here in Afghanistan. My sincere condolences to the victims and their families. I have served alongside the French military and they are professional and courageous. May they hunt down and kill the cancerous filth that carried out this “holy war” massacre. Fucking cowards, may they roast in hell for eternity.

As for the comment above about the deaths meaning nothing on a world scale, You could say the same thing about the Twin Towers, nearly 3000 died, but, on a world scale that means nothing. However, I lost two brothers in that attack and I have never forgot, never, ever, will forgive. Someone lost a lover, child, wife, or husband during that attack, so it will always mean something to them. Fucking extremist filth.
[/quote]

Agreed, fuck extremists.[/quote]

The thing is they’re not extremists.[/quote]

I think blowing yourself up makes you an extremist.

46

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]Bismark wrote:
Given the national tragedy that France, our oldest ally, has suffered today, political quips are wholly tasteless. As president Obama stated, “This is an attack not just on Paris, it’s an attack not just on the people of France, but this is an attack on all of humanity and the universal values that we share.” Show a modicum of respect for those affected.[/quote]

I don’t think political quips are necessarily tasteless in this case but I do appreciate your sentiment.

I do not appreciate the Obama quote. It was not an attack on humanity it was an attack by Muslims on the Western way of life. This is very important to understand and not doing so, understanding and acknowledging, it is impossible to properly deal with the problem.

It doesn’t matter if it was ISIS or Al Qaeda or someone else, THEY WERE MUSLIMS. The Muslim religion is a religion of hate. This attack was small fries, just wait until they get nukes. They won’t hesitate to use them.

The current course the Muslim people are on and the current course the western world is on, as far as dealing with the Muslims, leads to the inescapable conclusion that we can say good bye to Israel, New York City, Chicago, Boston, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Seattle. This will happen in less than 100 years. I’ve probably got 30-40 years left. I hope I don’t see this happen but I’m not optimistic.

Our only hope is the Muslims keep up enough of these small fry attacks that the rest of the world wakes up to the severity of the threat and actually does something about it. Otherwise, like I said, it’s only a matter of time. Could be in just ten to fifteen years. Anyone who doesn’t know this is just living in denial.

[/quote]

Setting aside the hysterics, what exactly are you proposing?

47

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]idaho wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Typical PWI responses, just some facts

  • Al qaeda is the obvious first choice for blame on organized attacks outside of the region, not ISIL
  • If you factor this into a yearly death average gun control is still in the liberals favor in respects to Paris
  • Compared to our world population these death tolls are nothing, climate change is still unknown so it can’t be dismissed as a smaller problem.[/quote]

What a dumb fucking thing to type.[/quote]

What did you expect from a summa cum laude graduate of the University of Pittttbulll?
[/quote]

I always thought he was fine, but that post was about as classless as it gets.[/quote]

I just woke up to this news here in Afghanistan. My sincere condolences to the victims and their families. I have served alongside the French military and they are professional and courageous. May they hunt down and kill the cancerous filth that carried out this “holy war” massacre. Fucking cowards, may they roast in hell for eternity.

As for the comment above about the deaths meaning nothing on a world scale, You could say the same thing about the Twin Towers, nearly 3000 died, but, on a world scale that means nothing. However, I lost two brothers in that attack and I have never forgot, never, ever, will forgive. Someone lost a lover, child, wife, or husband during that attack, so it will always mean something to them. Fucking extremist filth.
[/quote]

Agreed, fuck extremists.[/quote]

The thing is they’re not extremists.[/quote]

I think blowing yourself up makes you an extremist.[/quote]

I agree. What about all the millions who believe in strict sharia law?

48

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]Bismark wrote:
Given the national tragedy that France, our oldest ally, has suffered today, political quips are wholly tasteless. As president Obama stated, “This is an attack not just on Paris, it’s an attack not just on the people of France, but this is an attack on all of humanity and the universal values that we share.” Show a modicum of respect for those affected.[/quote]

I don’t think political quips are necessarily tasteless in this case but I do appreciate your sentiment.

I do not appreciate the Obama quote. It was not an attack on humanity it was an attack by Muslims on the Western way of life. This is very important to understand and not doing so, understanding and acknowledging, it is impossible to properly deal with the problem.

It doesn’t matter if it was ISIS or Al Qaeda or someone else, THEY WERE MUSLIMS. The Muslim religion is a religion of hate. This attack was small fries, just wait until they get nukes. They won’t hesitate to use them.

The current course the Muslim people are on and the current course the western world is on, as far as dealing with the Muslims, leads to the inescapable conclusion that we can say good bye to Israel, New York City, Chicago, Boston, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Seattle. This will happen in less than 100 years. I’ve probably got 30-40 years left. I hope I don’t see this happen but I’m not optimistic.

Our only hope is the Muslims keep up enough of these small fry attacks that the rest of the world wakes up to the severity of the threat and actually does something about it. Otherwise, like I said, it’s only a matter of time. Could be in just ten to fifteen years. Anyone who doesn’t know this is just living in denial.

[/quote]

Setting aside the hysterics, what exactly are you proposing?[/quote]

The only thing I can think of that might work is a united world in a multi generational effort to force Muslims to remove the hate from the Koran and all their teachings until it has been forgotten. That’s never going to happen so we’re fucked.

49

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]Bismark wrote:
Given the national tragedy that France, our oldest ally, has suffered today, political quips are wholly tasteless. As president Obama stated, “This is an attack not just on Paris, it’s an attack not just on the people of France, but this is an attack on all of humanity and the universal values that we share.” Show a modicum of respect for those affected.[/quote]

I don’t think political quips are necessarily tasteless in this case but I do appreciate your sentiment.

I do not appreciate the Obama quote. It was not an attack on humanity it was an attack by Muslims on the Western way of life. This is very important to understand and not doing so, understanding and acknowledging, it is impossible to properly deal with the problem.

It doesn’t matter if it was ISIS or Al Qaeda or someone else, THEY WERE MUSLIMS. The Muslim religion is a religion of hate. This attack was small fries, just wait until they get nukes. They won’t hesitate to use them.

The current course the Muslim people are on and the current course the western world is on, as far as dealing with the Muslims, leads to the inescapable conclusion that we can say good bye to Israel, New York City, Chicago, Boston, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Seattle. This will happen in less than 100 years. I’ve probably got 30-40 years left. I hope I don’t see this happen but I’m not optimistic.

Our only hope is the Muslims keep up enough of these small fry attacks that the rest of the world wakes up to the severity of the threat and actually does something about it. Otherwise, like I said, it’s only a matter of time. Could be in just ten to fifteen years. Anyone who doesn’t know this is just living in denial.

[/quote]

Setting aside the hysterics, what exactly are you proposing?[/quote]

The only thing I can think of that might work is a united world in a multi generational effort to force Muslims to remove the hate from the Koran and all their teachings until it has been forgotten. That’s never going to happen so we’re fucked.[/quote]

Have you actually read the Quran?

What happened to your plan of conducting a “preemptive” nuclear campaign against a quarter of the world’s population? Don’t tell me you’re going soft on me. Don’t give up on your genocidal ambitions Edgy.

50

Another problem I see when I was reading about the killing of the scum Jihad John. A lot of people were making comments about the strike saying stuff like “how many civilians did they kill also?” Because somehow the number of civilians killed equates to the number of terrorists created. Which makes no sense. ISIS or Al-Qaeda doesn’t ask “Gee, how many civilians were killed?” They deliberately target civilians like these cowards in France. They don’t care how many terrorists THEY create because they know there won’t be any. They are a death cult with a lust for human slaughter.

How can anyone or any country, for that matter deal with a situation like this? Until the West can come to grips with this we will never be victorious in our battle with them. We had no such qualms when defeating Nazism, but alas, that was a different time, I guess.

51

[quote]Bismark wrote:
Don’t give up on your genocidal ambitions Edgy. [/quote]

Our enemies surely haven’t.

And they are REALLY killing people, not just talking about it speculatively on a message board.

52

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]idaho wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Typical PWI responses, just some facts

  • Al qaeda is the obvious first choice for blame on organized attacks outside of the region, not ISIL
  • If you factor this into a yearly death average gun control is still in the liberals favor in respects to Paris
  • Compared to our world population these death tolls are nothing, climate change is still unknown so it can’t be dismissed as a smaller problem.[/quote]

What a dumb fucking thing to type.[/quote]

What did you expect from a summa cum laude graduate of the University of Pittttbulll?
[/quote]

I always thought he was fine, but that post was about as classless as it gets.[/quote]

I just woke up to this news here in Afghanistan. My sincere condolences to the victims and their families. I have served alongside the French military and they are professional and courageous. May they hunt down and kill the cancerous filth that carried out this “holy war” massacre. Fucking cowards, may they roast in hell for eternity.

As for the comment above about the deaths meaning nothing on a world scale, You could say the same thing about the Twin Towers, nearly 3000 died, but, on a world scale that means nothing. However, I lost two brothers in that attack and I have never forgot, never, ever, will forgive. Someone lost a lover, child, wife, or husband during that attack, so it will always mean something to them. Fucking extremist filth.
[/quote]

Agreed, fuck extremists.[/quote]

The thing is they’re not extremists.[/quote]

I think blowing yourself up makes you an extremist.[/quote]

I agree. What about all the millions who believe in strict sharia law?[/quote]

How does your statement relate to religious terrorism and responses to it?

Islamic jurisprudence (and Islam in general) is hardly monolithic. First of all, Muslims differ widely as to whether sharia should be open to multiple understandings. Second, support for making sharia the official law of the land varies significantly across regions. Third, of Muslims who support making sharia the law of the land, most do not believe that it should be applied to non-Muslims. Lastly, most supporters of sharia are most comfortable with its application in cases of family or property disputes. In most regions, far fewer favor other specific aspects of sharia, such as cutting off the hands of thieves and executing people who convert from Islam to another faith.

53

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Typical PWI responses, just some facts

  • Al qaeda is the obvious first choice for blame on organized attacks outside of the region, not ISIL
  • If you factor this into a yearly death average gun control is still in the liberals favor in respects to Paris
  • Compared to our world population these death tolls are nothing, climate change is still unknown so it can’t be dismissed as a smaller problem.[/quote]

What a dumb fucking thing to type.[/quote]

Well lets start with the first one. Why is ISIL the most likely suspect? Again I’m not saying it wasn’t them, I’m just saying without knowing anything they are not the first choice.

54

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]Bismark wrote:
Given the national tragedy that France, our oldest ally, has suffered today, political quips are wholly tasteless. As president Obama stated, “This is an attack not just on Paris, it’s an attack not just on the people of France, but this is an attack on all of humanity and the universal values that we share.” Show a modicum of respect for those affected.[/quote]

I don’t think political quips are necessarily tasteless in this case but I do appreciate your sentiment.

I do not appreciate the Obama quote. It was not an attack on humanity it was an attack by Muslims on the Western way of life. This is very important to understand and not doing so, understanding and acknowledging, it is impossible to properly deal with the problem.

It doesn’t matter if it was ISIS or Al Qaeda or someone else, THEY WERE MUSLIMS. The Muslim religion is a religion of hate. This attack was small fries, just wait until they get nukes. They won’t hesitate to use them.

The current course the Muslim people are on and the current course the western world is on, as far as dealing with the Muslims, leads to the inescapable conclusion that we can say good bye to Israel, New York City, Chicago, Boston, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Seattle. This will happen in less than 100 years. I’ve probably got 30-40 years left. I hope I don’t see this happen but I’m not optimistic.

Our only hope is the Muslims keep up enough of these small fry attacks that the rest of the world wakes up to the severity of the threat and actually does something about it. Otherwise, like I said, it’s only a matter of time. Could be in just ten to fifteen years. Anyone who doesn’t know this is just living in denial.

[/quote]
When someone feels compelled to insult a nation that just suffered a terrible loss, yes they are.

The terrorist is a hostis humani generis - an enemy of mankind. The religious breed in particular is an opponent of the universal values of life, liberty, and equality. Or do natural rights stop at the water’s edge?

Small fries? Over a hundred and fifty three human lives have been cut short. Would you be saying the same if your wife and children were among the dead? The coordinated attack in Paris is among the deadliest violence ever carried out by terrorists. Pakistan has been a nuclear weapons state for perhaps thirty years, but I wouldn’t expect an armchair general like yourself to have a grasp of rudimentary history. Maybe Islamabad didn’t get the memo?

Oh yes, the sinister Muslim cabal. Islam is not a monolithic religion, far from it. That’s a difficult thing for simple or lazy minds to understand. One can’t cogently transmute a quarter of the world’a population into the apocalyptic Weltanschauung of ISIL or the maximalist one of al-Qaida. It’s interesting to note that the head of the CIA’s Counter Terrorism Center for the past 9 years - the man who presided over the agencyâ??s aggressive drone campaign and directed the hunt for Osama bin Laden - is a convert to Islam.

55

[quote]Bismark wrote:

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]idaho wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Typical PWI responses, just some facts

  • Al qaeda is the obvious first choice for blame on organized attacks outside of the region, not ISIL
  • If you factor this into a yearly death average gun control is still in the liberals favor in respects to Paris
  • Compared to our world population these death tolls are nothing, climate change is still unknown so it can’t be dismissed as a smaller problem.[/quote]

What a dumb fucking thing to type.[/quote]

What did you expect from a summa cum laude graduate of the University of Pittttbulll?
[/quote]

I always thought he was fine, but that post was about as classless as it gets.[/quote]

I just woke up to this news here in Afghanistan. My sincere condolences to the victims and their families. I have served alongside the French military and they are professional and courageous. May they hunt down and kill the cancerous filth that carried out this “holy war” massacre. Fucking cowards, may they roast in hell for eternity.

As for the comment above about the deaths meaning nothing on a world scale, You could say the same thing about the Twin Towers, nearly 3000 died, but, on a world scale that means nothing. However, I lost two brothers in that attack and I have never forgot, never, ever, will forgive. Someone lost a lover, child, wife, or husband during that attack, so it will always mean something to them. Fucking extremist filth.
[/quote]

Agreed, fuck extremists.[/quote]

The thing is they’re not extremists.[/quote]

I think blowing yourself up makes you an extremist.[/quote]

I agree. What about all the millions who believe in strict sharia law?[/quote]

How does your statement relate to religious terrorism and responses to it?

Islamic jurisprudence (and Islam in general) is hardly monolithic. First of all, Muslims differ widely as to whether sharia should be open to multiple understandings. Second, support for making sharia the official law of the land varies significantly across regions. Third, of Muslims who support making sharia the law of the land, most do not believe that it should be applied to non-Muslims. Lastly, most supporters of sharia are most comfortable with its application in cases of family or property disputes. In most regions, far fewer favor other specific aspects of sharia, such as cutting off the hands of thieves and executing people who convert from Islam to another faith.[/quote]

Do you base that statement on personal experience? Because I have been in the Middle East and SW Asia for the past 10 years and your statements are not what I have observed and experienced. Are you talking about the corrupt ruling class?or just the general population? Anyway, getting off topic, perhaps we will save it for another day. I don’t want anything to derail the slaughter of the French citizens.

56

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Typical PWI responses, just some facts

  • Al qaeda is the obvious first choice for blame on organized attacks outside of the region, not ISIL
  • If you factor this into a yearly death average gun control is still in the liberals favor in respects to Paris
  • Compared to our world population these death tolls are nothing, climate change is still unknown so it can’t be dismissed as a smaller problem.[/quote]

What a dumb fucking thing to type.[/quote]

Well lets start with the first one. Why is ISIL the most likely suspect? Again I’m not saying it wasn’t them, I’m just saying without knowing anything they are not the first choice. [/quote]

France is a lead participant in the coalition opposing ISIL. Some 1,200 (nearly half of all European jihadis) Frenchmen have joined ISIL. It isn’t unreasonable to suspect that the Paris attack was ISIL networked or inspired. Witnesses report that attackers referred to Iraq and Syria. ISIL also praised the attack on social media. AQAP hasn’t.

57

[quote]idaho wrote:

[quote]Bismark wrote:

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]idaho wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Typical PWI responses, just some facts

  • Al qaeda is the obvious first choice for blame on organized attacks outside of the region, not ISIL
  • If you factor this into a yearly death average gun control is still in the liberals favor in respects to Paris
  • Compared to our world population these death tolls are nothing, climate change is still unknown so it can’t be dismissed as a smaller problem.[/quote]

What a dumb fucking thing to type.[/quote]

What did you expect from a summa cum laude graduate of the University of Pittttbulll?
[/quote]

I always thought he was fine, but that post was about as classless as it gets.[/quote]

I just woke up to this news here in Afghanistan. My sincere condolences to the victims and their families. I have served alongside the French military and they are professional and courageous. May they hunt down and kill the cancerous filth that carried out this “holy war” massacre. Fucking cowards, may they roast in hell for eternity.

As for the comment above about the deaths meaning nothing on a world scale, You could say the same thing about the Twin Towers, nearly 3000 died, but, on a world scale that means nothing. However, I lost two brothers in that attack and I have never forgot, never, ever, will forgive. Someone lost a lover, child, wife, or husband during that attack, so it will always mean something to them. Fucking extremist filth.
[/quote]

Agreed, fuck extremists.[/quote]

The thing is they’re not extremists.[/quote]

I think blowing yourself up makes you an extremist.[/quote]

I agree. What about all the millions who believe in strict sharia law?[/quote]

How does your statement relate to religious terrorism and responses to it?

Islamic jurisprudence (and Islam in general) is hardly monolithic. First of all, Muslims differ widely as to whether sharia should be open to multiple understandings. Second, support for making sharia the official law of the land varies significantly across regions. Third, of Muslims who support making sharia the law of the land, most do not believe that it should be applied to non-Muslims. Lastly, most supporters of sharia are most comfortable with its application in cases of family or property disputes. In most regions, far fewer favor other specific aspects of sharia, such as cutting off the hands of thieves and executing people who convert from Islam to another faith.[/quote]

Do you base that statement on personal experience? Because I have been in the Middle East and SW Asia for the past 10 years and your statements are not what I have observed and experienced. Are you talking about the corrupt ruling class?or just the general population? Anyway, getting off topic, perhaps we will save it for another day. I don’t want anything to derail the slaughter of the French citizens.
[/quote]

Social science research. Polls indicate that the countries that you have operational experience in are among the least enlightened and tolerant of adherents of Islam. The point was not to defend Islam as much as it was to put a pin in Edge’s parochial and histrionic view of the religion.

58

[quote]Gkhan wrote:

[quote]Bismark wrote:
Don’t give up on your genocidal ambitions Edgy. [/quote]

Our enemies surely haven’t.

And they are REALLY killing people, not just talking about it speculatively on a message board.[/quote]

The irony of someone advocating the nuclear bombing of a quarter of the world’s population based solely on their religious adherence shouldn’t be lost on anyone.

59

[quote]Bismark wrote:

They knew it in the 1980’s. Just sayin’[

Yes, fuck the cradle of civilization. [/quote]

This ain’t about you or me. It’s an emotional response and nothing more. Yes, fuck the middle east. They have been a torn in our collective assed for decades.
I do expect a declaration of war by France when all this is vetted out. Cutting the head off the snake is essential. I could hardly imagine you and I disagree on that??

60

My deepest condolences to the families who lost loved ones in the numerous attacks in Paris.

However I do have to point out how these two posters in particular have no problem with abortion all while they are staunch supporters of Barry. The loss of innocent lives is always wrong yet killing defenseless children is A-OK, why is that? Abortion slaughters over three thousand children every day in America yet Bismsark, sufiandy nor any abortion advocates have any problem with number of children dismembered through surgical and chemical abortions . I wonder why that is??

This was not intended as a thread derail, just observation. Please continue on.

[quote]Bismark wrote:
Given the national tragedy that France, our oldest ally, has suffered today, political quips are wholly tasteless. As president Obama stated, “This is an attack not just on Paris, it’s an attack not just on the people of France, but this is an attack on all of humanity and the universal values that we share.” Show a modicum of respect for those affected.[/quote]

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Typical PWI responses, just some facts

  • Al qaeda is the obvious first choice for blame on organized attacks outside of the region, not ISIL
  • If you factor this into a yearly death average gun control is still in the liberals favor in respects to Paris
  • Compared to our world population these death tolls are nothing, climate change is still unknown so it can’t be dismissed as a smaller problem.[/quote]