Really? More of those ORLY owls?
[quote]Haavik wrote:
Really? More of those ORLY owls?[/quote]
[quote]Haavik wrote:
You’re entering a world of pain, son.[/quote]
[quote]Haavik wrote:
WORLD OF PAIN[/quote]
What…is that?
LOL
Boobs, you are not a back!
This thread has detoured and reached a whole new level. Well played.
[quote]WestCoast7 wrote:
This thread has detoured and reached a whole new level. Well played.[/quote]
It is now…
strictly for teh lulz.
L.O.fucking.L @ “You don’t even have a spine.”
hahahaahhhhahahaahhahahahaahaaa
[quote]Professor X wrote:
LOL
Boobs, you are not a back![/quote]
I call photoshop, cuz if that’s real, I might throw up in my mouth. A little bit.
That’s F’in gangster
As for the more gifted than 99% of the population argument; 99% of the population is not reaching as hard as them.
Those with a fast twitch dominant muscle composition are advantaged when it comes to muscular hypertrophy, yes? As opposed to a different extreme of long distance runners for one. You see how strong ‘small’ long jumpers and other track guys are with weights without working with them too much, as they can’t afford any ‘useless’ muscle.
Does anybody think that all the people making bigger bucks or at least gaining far more exposure in real sports are genetically inferior, in terms of bodybuilding, to the minority that are actually dedicated to bodybuilding?
You can still make some aesthetic argument about bone structure and muscle shape which might be valid but it no longer concerns size, anyway.
^^GTFO
this thread isnt for discussion anymore
^^ Yeah, Alffi. I’m the one who is out of touch with where a thread has gone around here.
You trying to nudge me out or something?
.