[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
By the way, the red flags always go up when I hear, “I am not an anti-gun guy. I own several pistols/shotguns/rifles…”
Why?
Because all too often the next words out of the same mouth call for restrictions on, “the right of the people to keep and BEAR arms shall not be infringed.”
“Mr. Sheriff, pleeeeeeze allow me to exercise my God-given rights. Pleeeeeez. I’m promise I’ll be a good boy if you just give me my PERMIT that allows me to do what has already been guaranteed by my state and my federal constitutions. Thank you, kind sir.”[/quote]
I think OldOgre an me have more than likely seen similar people taking advantage of this law. The type people that are strapping a gun on their side are doing so because it makes them look like a Billy Badass. Some of these people I have hunted with and know that their concept of “bullet continues beyond target” is non-existent and if they are willing to send a rifle shot my way over a deer do you really think the opportunity to be a hero would slow them down.
As I said, there really is no realistic way to regulate that without infringing upon the 2nd and giving a tool to the anti-gun movement, so nothing should be done. However, I do not think that being apprehensive of some of these people toting around a gun at all times makes me anti-gun.[/quote]
And yet 100000 times the number of people die in car accidents. Gun deaths caused by law abiding citizens is such a non-issue. Makes for good rhetoric though as long as you don’t pay attention to the actual numbers.
There are far more people out there that have no business driving cars, but still do it. [/quote]
And driving a car is a “regulate-able” privilege not an inalienable right. For those who don’t understand the word “inalienable” look it up.[/quote]
As I am well aware, which is why I said that nothing should be done to limit that right. However, in a perfect world, those that choose to exercise that right would accept the personal responsibility of making themselves versed in how to properly use that gun that they have the right to. I still fail to see how saying that it concerns me that known idiots are now walking around with guns is anything less than logical? I am not saying take the guns away or keep them from carrying them, just that it concerns me to see someone who has very little concept on how to use a gun, toting a gun.[/quote]
So, what is your proposal about how to address the car issue? how do we force idiots to stop driving?[/quote]
We force idiots to stop driving all the time. That’s what happens when a license is suspended for DUI’s, excessive tickets, or even medical conditions that would make it dangerous to drive, IE epilepsy or blindness. Stevie Wonder and your local drunk cant drive a car but they can holster up if they choose to.[/quote]
Indeed. And therein lies the solution.
AFTER people fuck up we restrict their privileges. If we can do that with a mere privilege why can we not apply the same standard to a right?
Think this through, man. Think it through.[/quote]
But they have to prove they can drive before they are allowed to drive. The same thing is not true for carrying a gun. I have thought it through and I find it very concerning that the same people who have proven to have no regard for my life when there is a deer between us now carrying guns around all the time is concerning. Not to mention, DUI is a preventative thing, Will you still be able to open carry drunk? And I listed one instance in Florida of carry gone wrong, haven’t really bothered to dig for others. And I am not saying that these are going to be common place, merely I am looking for that one colossal fuck-up that kills a kid while trying to stop a shoplifter at Wal-Mart. It may happen in MS, AZ, NC, or ID but the more incompetent people that start to carry the more likely that becomes. And when it happens the anti-gun shit storm will be unreal.