[quote]orion wrote:
Plus, would it kill them to add a little more color?[/quote]
Yes. It would.
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]Rodimus Black wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]Hugh Jassman wrote:
Awesome, that guy really told those cops, all standing around looking tough, not hurting anyone…[/quote]
Was that ironic?
Because he did tell them.
Personally, I welcome everything and everyone that makes the servants of the Man question their point of view.[/quote]
What makes you think some guy who is clearly out of his fucking mind and making false accusations would make them “question their point of view?”[/quote]
Because no matter what you do you are a hero if you have ever in your life worn a state issued costume.
I am pretty sure that this is how it works.
[/quote]
Government issued costume makes you a demigod. Trust me. I know this.[/quote]
Its a shame that you do not get to wear tights.
Plus, would it kill them to add a little more color?[/quote]
They proposed it, but I look a million times better than the rest of the staff, so they nixxed it.
I was really hoping the guy would bust out in violence against the cops.
Would be like watching Godzilla chase fleeing Japanese. LOL
[quote]BradTGIF wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
Plus, would it kill them to add a little more color?[/quote]
Yes. It would.
[/quote]
Like this? yea good idea
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
If video cameras existed in the 18th century, and that vid was of John Adams spouting off after the Boston Massacre, you’d all be calling him a hero. [/quote]
If video cameras existed in the 18th century the boston massacre would have been called typical day, do you know how many died at the Boston Masscre? The answer is 5 total 3 the first day 2 the next hardly a massacre
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]BradTGIF wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
Plus, would it kill them to add a little more color?[/quote]
Yes. It would.
[/quote]
Like this? yea good idea[/quote]
“Militaries greatest Plunders” or some such.
I cannot recommend this book enough.
Some armies actually uniforms that were not that far away from your picture.
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]BradTGIF wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
Plus, would it kill them to add a little more color?[/quote]
Yes. It would.
[/quote]
Like this? yea good idea[/quote]
“Militaries greatest Plunders” or some such.
I cannot recommend this book enough.
Some armies actually uniforms that were not that far away from your picture. [/quote]
I do not doubt that at all, that is why dumbasses in Washington who couldnt find their ass with both hands need to keep out of Military issues.
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]BradTGIF wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
Plus, would it kill them to add a little more color?[/quote]
Yes. It would.
[/quote]
Like this? yea good idea[/quote]
“Militaries greatest Plunders” or some such.
I cannot recommend this book enough.
Some armies actually uniforms that were not that far away from your picture. [/quote]
I do not doubt that at all, that is why dumbasses in Washington who couldnt find their ass with both hands need to keep out of Military issues. [/quote]
Oh well, there were lots of incompetent generals and officers who got their men killed in spades.
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]BradTGIF wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
Plus, would it kill them to add a little more color?[/quote]
Yes. It would.
[/quote]
Like this? yea good idea[/quote]
“Militaries greatest Plunders” or some such.
I cannot recommend this book enough.
Some armies actually uniforms that were not that far away from your picture. [/quote]
I do not doubt that at all, that is why dumbasses in Washington who couldnt find their ass with both hands need to keep out of Military issues. [/quote]
Oh well, there were lots of incompetent generals and officers who got their men killed in spades.
[/quote]
Of course to honestly expect to put humans on any task with 100% efficiency is a pipe dream. That is why some people lose and some people win wars. Darwin
I’m not going to praise or crticize SGT. Thomas.
He has every right to speak his mind, and he did that. His brain percieves “threat” in a completely different way, so the posture of the police during these protests is way over the top.
That’s his perception.
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
If video cameras existed in the 18th century, and that vid was of John Adams spouting off after the Boston Massacre, you’d all be calling him a hero. [/quote]
John Adams took a lot of heat from the patriots because he volunteered to be the defending lawyer for redcoats responsible for firing into a crowd of civilians.
follow up interview
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
If video cameras existed in the 18th century, and that vid was of John Adams spouting off after the Boston Massacre, you’d all be calling him a hero. [/quote]
But it was an uppity soldier wanting everyone to know how hardcore he was compared to cops keeping the peace at a pointless rally instead.
No revolutions are occurring, no human rights are being denied and no new ideals are being presented.
Just a few angry socialists who want janitors to have the same peace of pie as people who actually move large quantities of money and then onlookers getting swept up in to a fervor because, hey, it’s better than the daily routine.
I am tired of this Occupy[insert destination] stuff. EVERY video I’ve seen of it reminds me of a bunch of teenagers arguing with their parents.
[quote]Evolv wrote:
I am tired of this Occupy[insert destination] stuff. EVERY video I’ve seen of it reminds me of a bunch of teenagers arguing with their parents. [/quote]
with one difference … said teenagers have a higher probability of forming a coherent and clear goal
[quote]polo77j wrote:
[quote]Evolv wrote:
I am tired of this Occupy[insert destination] stuff. EVERY video I’ve seen of it reminds me of a bunch of teenagers arguing with their parents. [/quote]
with one difference … said teenagers have a higher probability of forming a coherent and clear goal[/quote]
Hahaha, nice
[quote]Ambugaton wrote:
I bet he had the same thing screamed at him more than once while he was deployed. [/quote]
Haha most meaningful comment in the whole thread. Guy in the video has no grace. Real hero’s don’t point attention to themselves or what they “may” have done
[quote]dabit al-nufs wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
If video cameras existed in the 18th century, and that vid was of John Adams spouting off after the Boston Massacre, you’d all be calling him a hero. [/quote]
John Adams took a lot of heat from the patriots because he volunteered to be the defending lawyer for redcoats responsible for firing into a crowd of civilians. [/quote]
Actually no, Adams was offered the case because no one else would take it and he took it because of his “firm belief that no man in a free country should be denied the right to counsel and a fair trial.”
Additionally, he “incurre(d) a clamor and popular suspicions and prejudices” for performing “one of the most gallant, generous, manly and disinterested actions of (his) whole life.” And the previous year Adams defended four American sailors charged with killing a British naval officer and secured their aquittal.
As to the actual “massacre”…ahem…I think you should probably look into the details a bit more. However it’s besides the point. John Adams was a patriot of the utmost personal integrity. (PWI rant over)
[quote]orion wrote:
Some armies actually uniforms that were not that far away from your picture. [/quote]
You mean like this?
(Austrian Hussars)
EDIT: Actually the one on the right is a cuirrasier
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]dabit al-nufs wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
If video cameras existed in the 18th century, and that vid was of John Adams spouting off after the Boston Massacre, you’d all be calling him a hero. [/quote]
John Adams took a lot of heat from the patriots because he volunteered to be the defending lawyer for redcoats responsible for firing into a crowd of civilians. [/quote]
Actually no, Adams was offered the case because no one else would take it and he took it because of his “firm belief that no man in a free country should be denied the right to counsel and a fair trial.”
Additionally, he “incurre(d) a clamor and popular suspicions and prejudices” for performing “one of the most gallant, generous, manly and disinterested actions of (his) whole life.” And the previous year Adams defended four American sailors charged with killing a British naval officer and secured their aquittal.
As to the actual “massacre”…ahem…I think you should probably look into the details a bit more. However it’s besides the point. John Adams was a patriot of the utmost personal integrity. (PWI rant over)[/quote]
You just confirmed what I wrote.