[quote]SexMachine wrote:
There should be a warning label on zep’s avatar. It’s making me physically sick.[/quote]
Damn! That makes two of us, SM.
I was just about to post something similar.
It’s just really hard to take a post by Zep seriously when all you can see by his name is a gif of flabby, squishy ass cheeks in motion.
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
The only regulation here is that food producers MUST by law disclose pertinent information about the products they are marketing for sale.[/quote]
So WTF is this thread about again???
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
There should be a warning label on zep’s avatar. It’s making me physically sick.[/quote]
Damn! That makes two of us, SM.
I was just about to post something similar.
It’s just really hard to take a post by Zep seriously when all you can see by his name is a gif of flabby, squishy ass cheeks in motion.[/quote]
It’s not that flabby, squish, ass check’s fault! If the government would just ration out food they deem appropriate she wouldn’t be so squishy!
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
They should put a warning label on water, talk about addicting…[/quote]
What ingredients in water are being manipulated to spur on addiction and at the same time this info is being hidden from the public?
[/quote]
It’s that Hyro-7 process bro. Makes me want water ALL DAY!
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
They should put a warning label on water, talk about addicting…[/quote]
What ingredients in water are being manipulated to spur on addiction and at the same time this info is being hidden from the public?
[/quote]
It’s that Hyro-7 process bro. Makes me want water ALL DAY![/quote]
Is that Hydro-7 process activating the reward centers of the brain, making it addictive bro?
I must confess I am addicted to H2O. I once tried to go several days without it and almost died.
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
They should put a warning label on water, talk about addicting…[/quote]
What ingredients in water are being manipulated to spur on addiction and at the same time this info is being hidden from the public?
[/quote]
It’s that Hyro-7 process bro. Makes me want water ALL DAY![/quote]
Is that Hydro-7 process activating the reward centers of the brain, making it addictive bro?[/quote]
Not sure how much more addicting water can be bro. I pray the government forces Pepsi to tell me though…
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
They should put a warning label on water, talk about addicting…[/quote]
What ingredients in water are being manipulated to spur on addiction and at the same time this info is being hidden from the public?
[/quote]
It’s that Hyro-7 process bro. Makes me want water ALL DAY![/quote]
Is that Hydro-7 process activating the reward centers of the brain, making it addictive bro?[/quote]
Not sure how much more addicting water can be bro. I pray the government forces Pepsi to tell me though…[/quote]
Another incredibly weak point.
The cycle of Zeppelin795:
1.) Post something off the wall and/or completely asinine.
2.) 95+% of posters object to the stupidity with thoughtful responses as to why said position is bunk.
3.) Responses include but are not limited to:
“You do not understand the issue”
“Your point is weak”
“You’re an idiot”
“More government regulation”
These threads belong in GAL with the other joke threads.
[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
I must confess I am addicted to H2O. I once tried to go several days without it and almost died.[/quote]
It’s not your fault, you’re just uninformed about the fact that bottled water is nefariously filtered in such a way as to make you crave more and more.
I demand the government inform the public about the affect filtered water has on the reward center of the brain. These capitalist assholes won’t get away with this.
This sounds like it is right up Zep’s alley. Especially the shopping carts. Soon it will be criminal to eat anything not approved by big brother. And the free movie tickets are the icing on the cake.
You boys don’t get your drawers in a not; I’m not in favor of government intervention; I think food manufactures should be honest about their products because that’s what honorable people do. This is damn funny though and pushes all the right buttons.
^ holy shit - that’s some funny stuff.
[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
This sounds like it is right up Zep’s alley. Especially the shopping carts. Soon it will be criminal to eat anything not approved by big brother. And the free movie tickets are the icing on the cake.
[/quote]
Yes, I’m so against free choice that I believe consumers have the right to know what is being done to their food. How evil…
[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
You boys don’t get your drawers in a not; I’m not in favor of government intervention; I think food manufactures should be honest about their products because that’s what honorable people do. This is damn funny though and pushes all the right buttons.
[/quote]
But they aren’t honorable so they must be forced by law to tell the truth or suffer the consequences.
[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
You boys don’t get your drawers in a not; I’m not in favor of government intervention; I think food manufactures should be honest about their products because that’s what honorable people do. This is damn funny though and pushes all the right buttons.
[/quote]
BTW, the John Oliver skit is hilarious.
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
You boys don’t get your drawers in a not; I’m not in favor of government intervention; I think food manufactures should be honest about their products because that’s what honorable people do. This is damn funny though and pushes all the right buttons.
[/quote]
But they aren’t honorable so they must be forced by law to tell the truth or suffer the consequences.
[/quote]
We’ll Zep that’s where we part ways. Although I’ll agree with you about the problem, we don’t agree about the solution.
[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
You boys don’t get your drawers in a not; I’m not in favor of government intervention; I think food manufactures should be honest about their products because that’s what honorable people do. This is damn funny though and pushes all the right buttons.
[/quote]
But they aren’t honorable so they must be forced by law to tell the truth or suffer the consequences.
[/quote]
We’ll Zep that’s where we part ways. Although I’ll agree with you about the problem, we don’t agree about the solution.
[/quote]
I agree with Zep, they are not honest and they should be punished for dishonesty
[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
You boys don’t get your drawers in a not; I’m not in favor of government intervention; I think food manufactures should be honest about their products because that’s what honorable people do. This is damn funny though and pushes all the right buttons.
[/quote]
But they aren’t honorable so they must be forced by law to tell the truth or suffer the consequences.
[/quote]
We’ll Zep that’s where we part ways. Although I’ll agree with you about the problem, we don’t agree about the solution.
[/quote]
Yes, it seems it would be far more efficient to incentivize food manufacturers to produce decent products by only doing business with those who do so than it would be to give the state permission to spend even more money on yet another problem it can never solve.
Scenario A: A law is passed to combat XYZ, money must forever be spent to enforce the law. Because it’s obvious that a market exists for XYZ, a black market is born. An XYZ War can eventually be declared.
Scenario B: Those who care stop doing business with companies that XYZ. Companies that XYZ lose money, while companies that do not XYZ gain. If enough people care about XYZ, the companies that XYZ either go out of business or stop XYZ. If enough people don’t care about XYZ for either of those to happen, those who do can still continue to support the companies that do not XYZ.
[quote]NickViar wrote:
[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
You boys don’t get your drawers in a not; I’m not in favor of government intervention; I think food manufactures should be honest about their products because that’s what honorable people do. This is damn funny though and pushes all the right buttons.
[/quote]
But they aren’t honorable so they must be forced by law to tell the truth or suffer the consequences.
[/quote]
We’ll Zep that’s where we part ways. Although I’ll agree with you about the problem, we don’t agree about the solution.
[/quote]
Yes, it seems it would be far more efficient to incentivize food manufacturers to produce decent products by only doing business with those who do so than it would be to give the state permission to spend even more money on yet another problem it can never solve.
Scenario A: A law is passed to combat XYZ, money must forever be spent to enforce the law. Because it’s obvious that a market exists for XYZ, a black market is born. An XYZ War can eventually be declared.
Scenario B: Those who care stop doing business with companies that XYZ. Companies that XYZ lose money, while companies that do not XYZ gain. If enough people care about XYZ, the companies that XYZ either go out of business or stop XYZ. If enough people don’t care about XYZ for either of those to happen, those who do can still continue to support the companies that do not XYZ.[/quote]
Fraud is pretty straight forward Fraud wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain.