OK to Beat Gays and Women? Or Untenable Postions...

[quote]bluey wrote:
deanosumo wrote:

I am disturbed by how this thread has become a haven for thinly-disguised racism. People talking about how their countries (basically, the US and Canada) should be mono-cultural. They are using this cultural relativism issue as a cover for their bigotry.

It?s not about hating others its simple SURVIVAL of yourself and your way of life.

I notice that you are from Japan, which is a very Mono-cultural country. Japan accepts very few immigrants or refugees (e.g. 14 refugees for Japan in 2002 vs. 100,000 + for Britain, a similar size developed nation).

I doubt that you have experienced the problems that multiculturalism can cause.

[/quote]

I’m living here now. I’m not Japanese. I have lived most of my life in the West, in multicultural communities.

I know multiculturalism can bring some problems. But it’s a given in the modern world. And the diversity can make your country or community a more interesting place to live in. Exotic girls are hot! Ethnic food is good. I don’t feel threatened by hearing other languages spoken around me on the subway. I’m interested in how other cultures dress and celebrate their holidays. That’s just a few basic surface examples. And in my experience, most people want to get along.

To say that other cultures coming to your country or community threatens the survival of your own culture is ridiculous. How insecure are you? My neighborhood is 98% Japanese, but my apartment could be in New York, or Sydney, Auckland, or London. My culture and identity is intact.

[quote]bluey wrote:
Boston Barrister I agree with you a 100%

If you type the words ?Sydney, Lebanese and gang rape? into a search engine and read the results I don?t know how you can be an advocate for multiculturalism, especially if you are a women.

[/quote]

I’m familiar with the cases you mention. Terrible rapes. But those men broke the laws of Australia. It’s not so much a cultural issue, as a legal one. Therefore they deserve the strongest punishment. End of story! Would you deport all Lebanese from Australia? Or will you just light white crosses on their front lawns?

[quote]vroom, are you not aware that muslim sharia law is being seriously considered in Ontario?

Or that aboriginal justice now has a separate sentencing code in Canada?[/quote]

Hmm, interesting points. Here are some thoughts, go ahead and point me in the right direction if you think I’m off…

Considered is not the same as adopted. Adopted within the Canadian criminal code is not that same as purely adopted. If it is adopted, and it gives people an out with respect to Canadian laws, I will be vehemently opposed to it.

It was not my understanding that this was the case.

As for the Aboriginal groups. This gets more difficult. They don’t actually want to consider themselves as part of Canada, but independent nations not subject to Canadian law.

If they are independent, I lose the ability to control or care quite so much. If they stay within Canadian jurisdiction, then I’d want Canadian laws to apply. However, they have a different claim to specialness than other cultures, as they aren’t immigrants in any sense of the word.

[quote]deanosumo wrote:
bluey wrote:
Boston Barrister I agree with you a 100%

If you type the words ?Sydney, Lebanese and gang rape? into a search engine and read the results I don?t know how you can be an advocate for multiculturalism, especially if you are a woman.

I’m familiar with the cases you mention. Terrible rapes. But those men broke the laws of Australia. It’s not so much a cultural issue, as a legal one. Therefore they deserve the strongest punishment. End of story! Would you deport all Lebanese from Australia? Or will you just light white crosses on their front lawns?

[/quote]

… while goosestepping and speaking German. Sorry I am mixing my metaphors, which works better to stifle dissent calling someone a Nazi or a member of the Ku Klux Clan?

Other than the name-calling:

But it is a cultural issue (and the attacks are too numerous to be excused as isolated incidents). When even Lebanese spiritual leaders express such contempt:

Veiled threat an insult to all
By Miranda Devine
April 24, 2005
The Sun-Herald

Page Tools
Email to a friend Printer format Related
Muslim cleric: women incite men’s lust with ‘satanic dress’
At Bankstown Town Hall last month, just three kilometres from the scene of one of the most horrific of the gang rapes of 2000, a young and popular Lebanese Muslim sheik told a packed audience that rape victims have “no one to blame but themselves”.

These are the words of Sheik Faiz Mohamad, 34, to more than 1000 people squeezed into the hall on March 18, as recorded digitally by a concerned citizen.

“A victim of rape every minute somewhere in the world. Why? No one to blame but herself. She displayed her beauty to the entire world. She degraded herself by being an object of sexual desire and thus becoming vulnerable to man who looks at her for gratification of his sexual urge.”

There was much more about women’s responsibilities and the sins of the “kaffir” (infidel) that night from the charismatic former boxer and Liverpool Global Islamic Youth Centre teacher. But there was nothing about the responsibility of men to exercise self-restraint, even though most of the audience was male.

Sheik Faiz declined requests on Friday to be interviewed, so we don’t know if he is aware of the implications of what he said. But in a community still reeling from the spate of racially motivated gang rapes by Lebanese Muslim males from Bankstown and surrounds, it was extraordinarily impolitic.

“Strapless, backless, sleeveless, nothing but satanic skirts, slit skirts, translucent blouses, miniskirts, tight jeans,” he shouted into the microphone. “All this to tease man and appeal to his carnal nature.”

Mostly he appealed to Muslim women to wear the hijab (head covering), which, incidentally, has become fashionable on global catwalks since France banned it in public schools last year.

Born in Sydney of Lebanese parents, Faiz embraced Islam at 19 and spent several years studying in Saudi Arabia. On the one hand, he numbers among his friends and students such positive role models as Bulldogs league star Hazem El Masri and boxing champion Anthony Mundine, testament to the clean-living discipline of Islam.

On the other hand, the centre at which he teaches has attracted controversy over the actions of two former students. Supermarket shelf-stacker Zaky Mallah, 21, was last week sentenced to two years’ jail for threatening to kill Commonwealth officials and Muslim convert Jack Roche, 51, was convicted last year of plotting to blow up the Israeli embassy in Canberra.

Many in Sydney’s Lebanese Muslim community reject Faiz’s comments but are reluctant to speak on the record.

“Islam teaches that a woman could walk in front of you naked and you are supposed to be strong enough to say no,” said one Muslim leader. “It is a test of your faith.”

Faiz could be a good influence on young people, “if he calms down and gets rid of his anger . . . and understood the impact of his words. It’s not what he would do [that’s a problem]. It’s what he says; he colours the minds of young people.”

A non-Muslim who lives in Auburn and attended Faiz’s lecture said: “My biggest concern is that the Muslims who come to our country and just want to mind their own business, get a job, have a family and a home life with freedom, are progressively being pressured by their own community leaders to conform. The mould [they] are being pressed into is not good for them and not good for Australian society.”

Faiz’s view that unveiled women invite rape does Muslims a disservice by promoting an image which is repugnant to the majority of his fellow citizens. After all, when a judge feels so strongly that he would stand in front of a group of strangers, as one did in recent weeks, and make the comment that Lebanese Muslim men are a “cancer”, you know the community has an image problem which Faiz isn’t helping.

Faiz may not care but his words are a slap in the face to the brave young woman, known to the courts as Miss C, who was raped 25 times by 14 men over six hours outside the Bankstown Trotting Club and elsewhere in 2000.

At worst, his words sanction the kind of contempt for non-Muslim women that led those gang rapists to regard 18-year-old Miss C, dressed in her best suit for a job interview, sitting on a train reading The Great Gatsby, as an “Aussie pig” and slut.

“I looked in his eyes. I had never seen such indifference,” Miss C testified.

And your are wrong to say that it does affect your way of life. The message from some Muslims is clear “wear the hijab or be raped”

So what would you do? Allow more of the same (via future immigration) but deal with the fallout through the proper legal channels? What kind of solution is that? No solution.

This is multiculturalism in practice not theory.

?Exotic girls are hot!? as you say but for some Muslim men they care not if they are willing.

Sifu,

[quote]Sifu wrote:
makkun wrote:The jews were German citizens (many of them with a strong urge to integrate into the rest of society), with a centuries old tradition of living in Europe and Germany. Although they were hardly popular (antisemitic progroms and persecution have a long tradition in Europe), they were part of society, not newly admitted immigrants, introducing an unknown culture. Actually, Zygmont Baumann even argues that the strong wish of the jewish community to blend into German society led to the strong resentment coming from the non-jewish community.

This is their way of avoiding that situation.

Well, “they” came up with quite a dreadful “solution” within the 30ies…

Their solution was obviously terribly bad. My family has freinds who were german jews, who still live in germany. They say the germans are capable of doing it all again.[/quote]

As a German, I have to resent that notion. Germans have put great effort into undoing and avoiding anything like that since WWII (which we justly lost). It is one of the most pacifist industrialised nations and there is no majority in Germany that would support even the slightest move into such a direction.
If you go with modern social psychology, any society can do such a thing, and that includes Germany’s off course, but also the UK’s, the US’s, etc.

[quote]It’s certainly different from the approach Britians liberals forced on their people. The British were making people citizens and giving them passports even before they had left their home country. Some of the people they brought in were virilantly racist against the English and also against some of the other immigrant groups.

I agree that you can’t blame immigrants. I do think that the liberals were more interested in retaining power than looking out for the best interests of their constituents. That was bound to cause resentments. I really have to question where is the social injustice in bringing someone who is uneducated, unemployed and living in poverty in a third world slum over to one of the coolest cities in the first world for free, then giving them free housing, free food, free clothes, free medical care, free pocket money and access to first world jobs and income. Where is the injustice? I don’t see it in Britain and I certainly don’t see it in Holland where they have an even better social system than Britain

The problem I have with liberals is the hypocritical attitudes they have about prejudice. They will denounce hate from one group but then turn around and try to understand and justify it from another.

I think that is definitely over-simplified. No true democrat (liberal or conservative) shall accept prejudice, hatred or violence. Explaining it is something different than justifying it. I think that often get’s lost in the discussion.

Perhaps I did over simplify. However the gaybashing incident in BB’s initial post is not at all explained by social ill’s. I think those Morrocans would have done the same thing if they were in Morrocco. They did that simply because they hate gay people. Trying to see it as anything else is trying to give reasonable explanation to an unreasonable act.

Just because a religion has taught hatred of a group for over a thousnad years doesn’t mean it’s right. It just means they have been wrong for over a thousand years.

Yes. I absolutely agree. Any group teaching hatred of another should reconsider its opinions.

I’m glad to see that we can find some common ground.[/quote]

Yuh.

Makkun

Sorry Makkun

I was just relating what my freinds over there told me.

Every time I have been to Germany people have been very welcoming and I really liked it there.

The Hans and Sophie Scholl’s white rose movement certainly proved that there are Germans of good conscience.

Certainly the ideology of the third reich wasn’t isolated to Germany. America’s eugenics boards were in operation before and after the nazi state’s existance.

Sifu,

[quote]Sifu wrote:
Sorry Makkun

I was just relating what my freinds over there told me.

Every time I have been to Germany people have been very welcoming and I really liked it there.

The Hans and Sophie Scholl’s white rose movement certainly proved that there are Germans of good conscience.

Certainly the ideology of the third reich wasn’t isolated to Germany. America’s eugenics boards were in operation before and after the nazi state’s existance. [/quote]

Apology accepted.

Now back to the thread’s main topic: Are there people who define themselves as liberals, who mistake cultural understanding for a laissez-faire attitude? You bet - but I would, as many posters on this thread have done, be careful with blanket statements making acceptance of cultural diversity responsible for various ills within our societies.

Indeed diversity does create conflict, but understanding it also means a strong understanding (and pride) of the traditional values supported by “our” respective cultural backgrounds; I am one of those dreaded cultural scientists, and I have spent a lot of time discussing relativism - but I personally have no problem with setting clear limits to what is an acceptable practice and what is not.

As stated in the latest gay marriage thread, assessing your moral values within a wider context of general ethics makes it possible to distinguish between a cultural practice you can support and one you should stand up to. I, as a liberal lefty, can absolutely understand the disgust for some “liberals’” hypocritical doublestandards - but essentially, it shows their misunderstanding of liberalism and diversity issues.

Makkun

Just found an interesting piece in the left-leaning German weekly DER SPIEGEL on the (likely to leave) German government’s progressive social policies, and how they may now have enabled a truly unique new coalition.

Paving the Way for a Governing Coalition of Social Minorities
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,357701,00.html

Disclaimer I: This is not an attempt to highjack the thread and discuss German policies - it just shows the positive developments a pro-diversity stance can produce. Even for the conservative side.

Disclaimer II: “Liberal” in the German political context is economically libertarian whith mixed views on social issues.

Makkun

[quote]BostonBarrister wrote:
vroom wrote:
I don’t quite see what you are trying to say.

I’m guessing you are saying (that the author is stating) that in Europe liberal groups are unwilling to take a stand against culturally driven abuse?

The laws of the land are supposed to override any cultural practices… are they not?

They are. However, many liberal groups refuse to take a stand – even on issues they would supposedly champion, i.e. feminists and female-abuse – because of the untenable nature of their hallowing of the idea of relativism in cultural values. They won’t claim that Western ideas of individual rights for women should trump cultural (at least if it’s not Western culture) mores. They won’t come out and condemn beliefs in non-Western cultures.

And it’s blatantly hypocritical.[/quote]

What ‘liberal groups’ do this? Because the international sphere and the local sphere are very different as governmental legitimacy becomes altered. You nedd to clarify.

[quote]makkun wrote:
Just found an interesting piece in the left-leaning German weekly DER SPIEGEL on the (likely to leave) German government’s progressive social policies, and how they may now have enabled a truly unique new coalition.

Paving the Way for a Governing Coalition of Social Minorities
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,357701,00.html

Disclaimer I: This is not an attempt to highjack the thread and discuss German policies - it just shows the positive developments a pro-diversity stance can produce. Even for the conservative side.

Disclaimer II: “Liberal” in the German political context is economically libertarian whith mixed views on social issues.

Makkun[/quote]

Are there not marked differences between the North, South, East and West? I’m fairly confident Bavaria is far more conservative than, say Hamburg, which is incredibly permissive. I have no articles to back this up, I just remember a German friend pointing this out a few years back as a reason she’d not move south. Obviously if on the national governmental level there is a high level of social ‘enlightenment’ great. I’m just not sure it applies to all Germany.

JohnGullick,

[quote]JohnGullick wrote:
makkun wrote:
Just found an interesting piece in the left-leaning German weekly DER SPIEGEL on the (likely to leave) German government’s progressive social policies, and how they may now have enabled a truly unique new coalition.

Paving the Way for a Governing Coalition of Social Minorities
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,357701,00.html

Disclaimer I: This is not an attempt to highjack the thread and discuss German policies - it just shows the positive developments a pro-diversity stance can produce. Even for the conservative side.

Disclaimer II: “Liberal” in the German political context is economically libertarian whith mixed views on social issues.

Makkun

Are there not marked differences between the North, South, East and West? I’m fairly confident Bavaria is far more conservative than, say Hamburg, which is incredibly permissive. I have no articles to back this up, I just remember a German friend pointing this out a few years back as a reason she’d not move south. Obviously if on the national governmental level there is a high level of social ‘enlightenment’ great. I’m just not sure it applies to all Germany.[/quote]

You’re right - you bet that Bavaria is more conservative than most of the other Laender. But the funny thing is that even in Bavaria, although it supports often more stringent policies, a gay politician, manager or celebrity doesn’t really shock anyone anymore on a moral level. And that, as the article states, is IMO indeed a success of a more progressive view on minorities/diversity issues. And I find that highly entertaining. :wink:

Makkun