[quote]ZEB wrote:
TheBodyGuard,
My gosh only on the Internet can someone (like you) call another person pathetic when he himself cannot even understand how to use something as simple as the quote function. I know, all those words running together is just too much for you.
[/quote]
I see you put together another personal attack b/c I don’t sit here all day and play with the quote function to keep up with your nonsense. Yet another empty reply from you. You ARE consistent if anything.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
Really run along now. skip off to your next “triumph” in logical fallacies, and half remembered statements.
[/quote]
No half remembered statement. I cut and paste your statement about God’s communication. You have yet to respond to it. We’re waiting.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
At least that explains why you’ve been avoiding the quote function in earlier posts. It’s just too complicating and confusing - Got it.
[/quote]
Oh, because no one else ever fucked up the quote function on a long winded, line by line rebuttal by the likes of a needle dicking reply artist? Got it.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
And you are the guy that has the universe figured to the point where you are certain that a 2000 year old religion is wrong. Right.
[/quote]
I do believe that right there is one of those “logical fallacies” you’re so fond of turning on its head. Are you implying because your religion is 2000 years old that it’s not wrong? LOL Right. So by that logic, all those religions that pre-date yours claim authenticity by age. Brilliant! Further using your logic, we need only go back to the first religion, and claim that as truth! Does that about sum it up genius? Tell me again…who is dim?
[quote]ZEB wrote:
But I don’t want to end this post without thanking you for the shear entertainment value that you’ve provided. With the grand crescendo being your idle threat to beat up one particular poster who also apparently got the better of you in a brief discussion. “I live in Jersey maybe we can meet up.” Priceless!
[/quote]
I tell you what you apparently don’t want to do. You don’t want to have a discussion. You dropped the discussion right about the time you made that blundering, inexplicable statement implying God’s ability to communicate with us was somehow limited. In fact, that’s exactly where you “jumped the shark” and started with your personal attacks.
And, can you further cloud the discussion any more by bringing up a person that made a pure personal attack about my avatar? That’s what you’re leaning on these days? Priceless!
Let me know when you’re ready to continue the discussion, starting with your defense relative to your statements about God’s ability to communicate with us. We’re waiting.
- back at ya