[quote=“pushharder, post:62, topic:213391”]
This “mandate” just encourages sometimes ornery folks like me to be rebellious and “beat the system.”[/quote]
Really though, how do you think that’s going to go?
Son of a gun…
1 Like
No worries. I’m a deputy.
1 Like
Pathetic but it played well to his left wing loony constituency.
By the way I am Zeb1 now for some unknown reason. Ha
You can disagree with him, that’s absolutely fine. But once you start believing things like Obama’s tears are fake you’ve stepped into nutbar territory.
I’ve seen people ask why he didn’t cry at some other thing. What? Where twenty children were shot?
Not many cops shed tears even at another cop’s funeral. You think the president is supposed to cry for every cop or soldier that dies? Nice try. You’re full of shit.
Stop playing your role so hard.
Yes.
I’m not a nut.
You have no facts to support any of your points so that’s why you just mock Canadians and say people are full of shit without countering any points and tell me to mind my own business because I’m not American.
The people that are against any kind of gun legislation only have unwieldy analogies and hypothetical situations to defend their points and never any facts.
Comparing guns to cars or spoons (“Spoons make people fat so should we outlaw spoons Obummer??”) and the laughable idea that you need your guns in case you need to fight the tyrannical government.
I love a good sci-fi movie once in a while, but never let that level of fantasy and self-deception leak into real life.
Looking back over the course of history, how exactly is it laughable to think that people may have to defend themselves from the state? I wouldn’t consider government shedding its own citizens blood a rare occurrence, would you?
“Your society as a whole is made up of a bunch of spineless fools and gutless fuckups.”
That’s a dick thing to say.
And yeah…I’ve been “wasting my time” in GAL while you’ve been working hard supporting guns here. HA HA!
hit delete instead of edit two posts up