Obama campaign experts in Israel to defeat Netanyahu:
[quote]Gkhan wrote:
Rancorous partisan politics threatens to derail almost a decade of delicate diplomacy.
I heard Netanyahu speak the other day, reminded me of Javier Bardem from No Country for Old Men
Iran targets Netanyahu’s children for assassination.
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/iran-targets-netanyahu-children-for-assassination/
Obama admin furious with Netanyahu:
http://m.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-s-israel-problem_830240.html
Not much to do about Iran and Israel, but now the White House has claimed that the Taliban are not considered terrorists.
http://news.yahoo.com/taliban-not-terrorists-says-white-house-220922680.html
[quote]Gkhan wrote:
Not much to do about Iran and Israel, but now the White House has claimed that the Taliban are not considered terrorists.
http://news.yahoo.com/taliban-not-terrorists-says-white-house-220922680.html[/quote]
The reclassification was part of the Bowe Bergdahl deal.
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]Gkhan wrote:
Not much to do about Iran and Israel, but now the White House has claimed that the Taliban are not considered terrorists.
http://news.yahoo.com/taliban-not-terrorists-says-white-house-220922680.html[/quote]
The reclassification was part of the Bowe Bergdahl deal.[/quote]
Not really. It’s been Ocharmer’s policy all along. Years ago(2011) Biden was insisting that “the Taliban is not our enemy”.
The Taliban are not terrorists and are not our enemy. Now that that’s over with, let’s meet with The Muslim Brotherhood…
That worked well…
Obama: Iran has “no aspiration to get a nuclear weapon” because “it would be contrary to their faith” -
They’re burning and beheading victims in the name of Islam, but President Obama delivered a major speech Wednesday on combating violent extremism - while refusing to use the words “Muslim terrorists.”
Following months of unrelenting atrocities by ISIS killers who released videos of themselves beheading US journalists and, most recently, 21 Coptic Christians, and burning a man alive, the president kowtowed to the audience by proclaiming that “Islam has been woven into the fabric of our country since its founding.”
“Generations of Muslim immigrants came here and went to work as farmers and merchants and factory workers, helped to lay railroads and build up America,” he said.
“The first Islamic center in New York City was founded in the 1890s. America?s first mosque - this was an interesting fact - was in North Dakota.”
And just days after Pope Francis condemned ISIS’s barbaric murders of 21 Egyptians “simply for the fact that they were Christians,” Obama insisted al Qaeda and their ilk “are not religious leaders. They’re terrorists.”
----- Read more: Obama refuses to acknowledge ‘Muslim terrorists’ at summit
Now I know we’re not allowed to ask any questions and we have to be very careful about what we say; we’re walking on eggshells here so let me just say first and foremost. I know Barack Hussein Obama loves Jesus and was saved by the Reverend Jeremiah Wright and the church fed him when he was hungry and all that. The whole none yards. I believe every word of it. But can we just take a look at a few things here?
So, Rashid Khalidi. Who’s he? A Palestinian activist and former speech writer for Yasser Arafat. Kind of like Yasser Arafat’s Jay Carney. His apologist. And Rashid Khalidi was his apologist during the First Intifada and acted as his apologist as Arafat unleashed a wave of deadly suicide attacks on buses and discos and markets. He was very close to Obama. They minded each other’s children. Went to each other’s weddings. Obama said, “the many dinners I had with Rashid and his lovely wife Mona have forced me to rethink some of my own prejudices and biases” and the LA Times even obtained a video of Obama lavishing praise on the terrorist activist at a fund raising event. They sat on the same boards together with mutual friend and unrepentant domestic terrorist Bill Ayers and issued grants for all kinds of left-wing projects.
And then there’s Obama’s half brother. They’re regularly in contact. He’s wanted in Egypt on terrorism charges. He’s involved in all kinds of shadey front groups for Islamic fundamentalist organisations; can be seen sporting a Hamas scarf. And within the administration? Valerie Jarrett. No portfolio. Unprecedented access to the President. One of his key advisers. A Muslim who is on record as saying she wants to make America a Muslim nation. All those Muslim “leaders” and advisers and coordinators on boards of all kinds of shadey organisations like CARE; the Muslim Brotherhood front groups. Don’t laugh. We know there were damn Nazis in the government between the wars. And Stalinists and Soviet agents. Now we have this new threat.
Where has Obama been leading us? Last week he’s attacking Christians at prayer meeting. Castigating them about the crusades. A few days later and he’s white washing the attack on kosher deli; just a random bunch of folk. Not targeted because of who they were. Not all of the same background. And he won’t identify the problem as radical Islam. It’s always us. We’re the problem. We weren’t good enough to Obama. And the religion of his father can do no wrong. He won’t even say the name Mohammad. He calls him “the prophet” and speaks of him reverentially. Oh yes, the Muslims built America didn’t you know?
This man is a fraud and I’m calling him out. Yes I think he has a deep affinity towards Islam. I think he hates Christianity and Jews. I think he doesn’t share any of the values of most Americans. I think he despises most Americans. He wants to “fundamentally transform” America. It’s not good enough for him. Not fair enough. Like Ruth Bader Ginsburg said, it will never end till there are no men on the Supreme Court. It never ends with these Western Marxists; these new left cultural Marxists like Obama who are seeking to destroy us.
Perhaps he figures that his bases are covered by referring to the organisation in question as the Islamic State.
I just read this little bit, kind of a twitchy about Israel-Iran
https://storify.com/drawandstrike/all-the-wrong-moves
I was wondering if Obama’s (feigned?) negligence of the situation is possibly a more calculated (I know I know, he’s a moron) move to force Israel into action, thereby enabling his Muslim brothers to be the “victims” of said attack.
What’s up with this?
[quote]MattyG35 wrote:
I just read this little bit, kind of a twitchy about Israel-Iran
https://storify.com/drawandstrike/all-the-wrong-moves
I was wondering if Obama’s (feigned?) negligence of the situation is possibly a more calculated (I know I know, he’s a moron) move to force Israel into action, thereby enabling his Muslim brothers to be the “victims” of said attack.
[/quote]
Regardless, Muslims are always playing the victim of someone or something, that gives them the reason to constantly be on the attack since it is allegedly in response to a supposed wrong.
ie 9-ll was in response to American forces in Saudi Arabia.
Paris was in response to the cartoons.
Boston was a response Iraq & Afghanistan. (Never mind the fact that Afghanistan was in retaliation for 9-11…)
An Isis burning the pilot alive was in response to ISIS “women and children” dying in bombing raids (never mind the fact that they declared war against everyone and anyone first).
My question is: In 711, what did the Spanish do to the Muslims to cause them to invade Europe?
Obama can cry about the Crusades all he wants. The real war started in 711 or earlier.
[quote]Gkhan wrote:
[quote]MattyG35 wrote:
I just read this little bit, kind of a twitchy about Israel-Iran
https://storify.com/drawandstrike/all-the-wrong-moves
I was wondering if Obama’s (feigned?) negligence of the situation is possibly a more calculated (I know I know, he’s a moron) move to force Israel into action, thereby enabling his Muslim brothers to be the “victims” of said attack.
[/quote]
Regardless, Muslims are always playing the victim of someone or something, that gives them the reason to constantly be on the attack since it is allegedly in response to a supposed wrong.
ie 9-ll was in response to American forces in Saudi Arabia.
Paris was in response to the cartoons.
Boston was a response Iraq & Afghanistan. (Never mind the fact that Afghanistan was in retaliation for 9-11…)
An Isis burning the pilot alive was in response to ISIS “women and children” dying in bombing raids (never mind the fact that they declared war against everyone and anyone first).
My question is: In 711, what did the Spanish do to the Muslims to cause them to invade Europe?
Obama can cry about the Crusades all he wants. The real war started in 711 or earlier.
[/quote]
692 AD, I’d say, with the conquest of Carthage.
Of course, one could say that was payback for 146 BC.
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]Gkhan wrote:
[quote]MattyG35 wrote:
I just read this little bit, kind of a twitchy about Israel-Iran
https://storify.com/drawandstrike/all-the-wrong-moves
I was wondering if Obama’s (feigned?) negligence of the situation is possibly a more calculated (I know I know, he’s a moron) move to force Israel into action, thereby enabling his Muslim brothers to be the “victims” of said attack.
[/quote]
Regardless, Muslims are always playing the victim of someone or something, that gives them the reason to constantly be on the attack since it is allegedly in response to a supposed wrong.
ie 9-ll was in response to American forces in Saudi Arabia.
Paris was in response to the cartoons.
Boston was a response Iraq & Afghanistan. (Never mind the fact that Afghanistan was in retaliation for 9-11…)
An Isis burning the pilot alive was in response to ISIS “women and children” dying in bombing raids (never mind the fact that they declared war against everyone and anyone first).
My question is: In 711, what did the Spanish do to the Muslims to cause them to invade Europe?
Obama can cry about the Crusades all he wants. The real war started in 711 or earlier.
[/quote]
692 AD, I’d say, with the conquest of Carthage.
Of course, one could say that was payback for 146 BC.
[/quote]
But that was instigated by the Romano-Nazis who invaded Messana in support of the murderous Mamertines and began a century of treachery against Carthage and her maritime port cities / colonies and trading partners in the Western Mediterranean.
Giuliani has some strong words for Obama
Pretty refreshing to hear a public figure be as honest as this
Came across another gem
He really doesn’t give a fuck, tells it like he sees it
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]Gkhan wrote:
[quote]MattyG35 wrote:
I just read this little bit, kind of a twitchy about Israel-Iran
https://storify.com/drawandstrike/all-the-wrong-moves
I was wondering if Obama’s (feigned?) negligence of the situation is possibly a more calculated (I know I know, he’s a moron) move to force Israel into action, thereby enabling his Muslim brothers to be the “victims” of said attack.
[/quote]
Regardless, Muslims are always playing the victim of someone or something, that gives them the reason to constantly be on the attack since it is allegedly in response to a supposed wrong.
ie 9-ll was in response to American forces in Saudi Arabia.
Paris was in response to the cartoons.
Boston was a response Iraq & Afghanistan. (Never mind the fact that Afghanistan was in retaliation for 9-11…)
An Isis burning the pilot alive was in response to ISIS “women and children” dying in bombing raids (never mind the fact that they declared war against everyone and anyone first).
My question is: In 711, what did the Spanish do to the Muslims to cause them to invade Europe?
Obama can cry about the Crusades all he wants. The real war started in 711 or earlier.
[/quote]
692 AD, I’d say, with the conquest of Carthage.
Of course, one could say that was payback for 146 BC.
[/quote]
Which could, in all intents and purposes, be in retaliation for events from approximately 1188 BC, which, of course, were in retaliation for the events of approx. 1180 BC.
edit- Greek Trojan war, get it? oh well…
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/new-docs-reveal-osama-bin-ladens-secret-ties-iran_868678.html
Interesting article shows how Iran and Al-Qaeda are linked.