Obama Qualifications?

[quote]Beowolf wrote:

Politically, how much experience did Lincoln have? Not life experience, that isn’t what this is about. [/quote]

Here is your problem - that is exactly what this is about. You could have lots of political experience. You could also have lots of experience running a business. Or serving on non-profit boards. Political experience is a plus - sometimes a lifetime career in politics can cut against you.

The big concern that keeps getting dismissed is that Obama hasn’t shown much success or experience in much of anything outside of his academics. He married a very driven, successful woman and wrote a great-selling autobiography at the age of 34. That is about it.

He got elected to the US Senate after his opponent had to bow out due to a scandal. He never really ran against anyone.

Fighting Irish assures us that Obama is nakedly partisan, so all the marketing of “Hope and Change” is pure fiction.

So, nothing transcendent about his politics, and no track record of accomplishing anything, whether political or not.

That is a worry, this silliness aside.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Obama is popular with elites because they recognize themselves in him — a hippie who despises honest labor, who believe in getting rich ‘the lawyer way’ or who are hippie-activists. Obama was a hippie on the south side of Chicago, who greased up to Big Tony Rezco. That led to his wonderful political career as we know it. Now throw in the hatred for America of Pastor Wright and William Ayers, and you’ve got the perfect hippie timebomb.

This glib punk has even less qualifications than George W. Bush. Thunderbolt is more qualified by far than Barack Hussein Obama.[/quote]

And McCain is popular with elites, because with 7 homes, his own plane and MAD money, he is one.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
Mick28 wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
Lincoln had more substance, that is obvious, but his experience was still relatively similar to Obama’s level.

Lincoln was a high-priced railroad lawyer, never a senator. His gang lost to Douglas’ gang in 1858. He was put up by the railroad to push ‘internal improvements’ (a scam for free land). His payoff as POTUS was advance info on where the railhead would be — Council Bluffs, Iowa. He made a bundle.

Lincoln is, IMO, a far smarter crook than Obama. Of course, Lincoln is probably the smartest of the bunch, after James Madison.
[/quote]

Thread hijack, but some distortions should not stand. HH’s assertion is not quite true. Here is a short history, from a review of the history of Council Bluffs.:
[i]
"Lincoln’s Blackhawk War service also resulted in him claiming 160 acres of land about seven miles northwest of what is now Dennison, in Crawford County. It is listed as Land Warrant 68,465 as a reward for serving as a captain of the Illinois militia during the Sac and Fox skirmish of 1832.

But that wasn’t the only southwest Iowa land in which Lincoln had an interest. On February 1, 1859, he wrote a letter from Springfield, Illinois to then Kansas resident M. W. Delahay that he, Lincoln, intended to visit Council Bluffs sometime during the year.

Lincoln and O. M. Hatch, Illinois Secretary of State, left Springfield on August 9, 1859, for Council Bluffs. Lincoln planned to look over property being offered by Norman B. Judd as security for a $3,000 debt.

While in town, Lincoln found railroad civil engineer, Grenville M. Dodge, relaxing on the porch of the Pacific House. Having been told by Pusey that Dodge had been looking for a practical rail route to the Pacific Ocean, Lincoln skillfully questioned Dodge for two hours.

Years later, Dodge wrote: “This interview was of the greatest importance to me. It was a milestone in my life and Lincoln never forgot it.”

Much later, midway through the Civil War, Lincoln persuaded Congress to fund a transcontinental railroad through Iowa. Dodge purchased 1,000 acres of land in Council Bluffs for the Union Pacific.

[b}Lincoln said if he designated Council Bluffs as the starting point for the Union Pacific Railroad, he would be accused of doing it for personal gain, because of the Judd lots, but he was going to go ahead and do it anyway.[/b]

Although Lincoln was killed by an assassin’s bullet, his interview with Dodge on the porch of the Pacific House in Council Bluffs set the stage for the later construction of the first transcontinental railroad across America - through Council Bluffs."
[/i]
I do not see where “the Railroads” paid off Lincoln, and this is not mentioned in DK Goodwin’s biography. Further, this story is consonant with the Dodge story in McCullough’s book on the building of the transcontinental railroad. Further, the railroad was not started until the Grant Administration, and Lincoln could not have profited in it as HH describes.

Next, was Lincoln “a high-priced railroad lawyer.” A principal interest of the Whig party, to which he belonged was support for "internal improvements,’ which were of particular interest to common folks of the West, and not to railroads alone. And no, he had a few railroad cases. From our friends at Wikipedia:

“Lincoln was involved in more than 5,100 cases in Illinois alone during his 23-year legal career. Though many of these cases involved little more than filing a writ, others were more substantial and quite involved. Lincoln and his partners appeared before the Illinois State Supreme Court more than 400 times.”

Recall that Hillary was acclaimed as a brilliant jurist, and yet had argued only a single case in court in her entire career.

So, HH, while I share your respect for Madison, site a source for your Lincoln contentions, since your take on history does not match mine.

And Beowulf, once you read the Cooper Union Speech, as suggested by tb23, come back and tell us whether Lincoln had experience comparable to Obama, who serves often as a blank screen onto which a generation has projected its fashions and hopes.

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Beowolf wrote:

Politically, how much experience did Lincoln have? Not life experience, that isn’t what this is about.

Here is your problem - that is exactly what this is about. You could have lots of political experience. You could also have lots of experience running a business. Or serving on non-profit boards. Political experience is a plus - sometimes a lifetime career in politics can cut against you.

The big concern that keeps getting dismissed is that Obama hasn’t shown much success or experience in much of anything outside of his academics. He married a very driven, successful woman and wrote a great-selling autobiography at the age of 34. That is about it.

He got elected to the US Senate after his opponent had to bow out due to a scandal. He never really ran against anyone.

Fighting Irish assures us that Obama is nakedly partisan, so all the marketing of “Hope and Change” is pure fiction.

So, nothing transcendent about his politics, and no track record of accomplishing anything, whether political or not.

That is a worry, this silliness aside.[/quote]

If we’re arguing life experience, than yes, Lincoln had more in spades, and Obama has very little.

W/e. Fuck this shit. I’m not voting for him anyway. I never said I bought his “change” BS. This argument is about experience dammit. But w/e.

Gnite. (And I mixed senator with Rep. Got that wrong, ty for the correction).

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Mufasa wrote:
Agree, HH…

I tell you what…whomever the President is, and whomever is in the Senate and Congress, are going to have to step up and cut the partisan bullshit over the next few years.

Otherwise our Country is in serious trouble.

Will it happen?

I hate to say it, but I doubt it…

Mufasa

Oh stop. What planet do you guys live on?

Since when has politics not been partisan? When has ANYBODY ever cut out partisanship?

Say what you will about the current situation, but don’t act like it was ever better at any other time in History.
Again, this fake ass nostalgia drives me nuts.
[/quote]

Agree. History has always been crisis after crisis. The only thing different about today is the incredible methods of communication.

Did 100millimeters ever post a more liberal president than Obama or is he just talking out his ass? (again)

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Did 100millimeters ever post a more liberal president than Obama or is he just talking out his ass? (again)[/quote]

100m has a talking donkey? I’m not at all surprised… he always was close to John Kerry.

Buh-dum-cha!

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Did 100millimeters ever post a more liberal president than Obama or is he just talking out his ass? (again)[/quote]

WTF?

[quote]Mick28 wrote:

For the record he’d also be the most liberal to ever hold that office should he win.

Good if it were true.

Could you name just one man who has held that office who is more liberal than Obama?

Just one will do and if you’re correct Obama will be the second most liberal person to ever hold that office should he win.

Okay…go ahead we’re waiting.

[/quote]

Oh, now I see!

But more liberal presidents, obviously LBJ and FDR.

[quote]100meters wrote:
Mick28 wrote:

For the record he’d also be the most liberal to ever hold that office should he win.

Good if it were true.

Could you name just one man who has held that office who is more liberal than Obama?

Just one will do and if you’re correct Obama will be the second most liberal person to ever hold that office should he win.

Okay…go ahead we’re waiting.

Oh, now I see!

But more liberal presidents, obviously LBJ and FDR.

[/quote]

Seriously? You have an awfully strange perspective.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
100meters wrote:
Mick28 wrote:

For the record he’d also be the most liberal to ever hold that office should he win.

Good if it were true.

Could you name just one man who has held that office who is more liberal than Obama?

Just one will do and if you’re correct Obama will be the second most liberal person to ever hold that office should he win.

Okay…go ahead we’re waiting.

Oh, now I see!

But more liberal presidents, obviously LBJ and FDR.

Seriously? You have an awfully strange perspective.[/quote]

Well, I’d say LBJ and FDR were more liberal for their time period. However, in liberal “magnitude” (if such a thing could be measured), Obama wants to expand upon what has already been expanded upon, what they created. So he, magnitude wise, is much more of a lefty.

Political Magnitude - I’ve discovered a new college major.

[quote]Beowolf wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
100meters wrote:
Mick28 wrote:

For the record he’d also be the most liberal to ever hold that office should he win.

Good if it were true.

Could you name just one man who has held that office who is more liberal than Obama?

Just one will do and if you’re correct Obama will be the second most liberal person to ever hold that office should he win.

Okay…go ahead we’re waiting.

Oh, now I see!

But more liberal presidents, obviously LBJ and FDR.

Seriously? You have an awfully strange perspective.

Well, I’d say LBJ and FDR were more liberal for their time period. However, in liberal “magnitude” (if such a thing could be measured), Obama wants to expand upon what has already been expanded upon, what they created. So he, magnitude wise, is much more of a lefty.

Political Magnitude - I’ve discovered a new college major.
[/quote]

I agree, Obama does not want to roll back their programs, he wants to extend them.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
100meters wrote:
Mick28 wrote:

For the record he’d also be the most liberal to ever hold that office should he win.

Good if it were true.

Could you name just one man who has held that office who is more liberal than Obama?

Just one will do and if you’re correct Obama will be the second most liberal person to ever hold that office should he win.

Okay…go ahead we’re waiting.

Oh, now I see!

But more liberal presidents, obviously LBJ and FDR.

Seriously? You have an awfully strange perspective.

Well, I’d say LBJ and FDR were more liberal for their time period. However, in liberal “magnitude” (if such a thing could be measured), Obama wants to expand upon what has already been expanded upon, what they created. So he, magnitude wise, is much more of a lefty.

Political Magnitude - I’ve discovered a new college major.

I agree, Obama does not want to roll back their programs, he wants to extend them. [/quote]

And because of the monumentally stupid missteps of the Republicans in the last 12 years, he finally can!

Really, Republicans have no one to blame but themselves.