So, just what has the man done to make one think he is a good choice to be president?
Here’s a post that looks at some of the accomplishments he’s tauting w/r/t housing (high on the list for a president in any case…):
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NmJjMjg1ODUwNjFjMTMxMDE4OTQxNjEwMjI3Njk2YjM=
[i]The Boston Globe Reveals the Catastrophic Failures of Obama’s Housing Efforts
I don’t begrudge Barack Obama the modesty of his accomplishments ( http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YTMwYjg0ZmEyNDFiN2UzYjBjNjQyNmQzOTRlNjFhNGY= ) as a community organizer. Stemming the tide of urban decay in Chicago’s worst neighborhoods in the late 1980s was beyond even the most tireless efforts of one man.
“Sisyphian” is the term that keeps coming to mind, but I would note that what Obama actually accomplished - “a successful effort to convince the city of Chicago to locate a jobs placement office on the far South Side and his part in a drive to push the city to clean asbestos out of a housing project in the same area [Altgeld Gardens]” �?? aren�??t a ton to show for three years of effort.
As a state legislator, Obama had been in office for all of four years before he decided he was ready to replace Rep. Bobby Rush in Congress. The voters in his district didn’t see it that way.
Relatively powerless when Democrats were in the minority, Obama’s accomplishments piled up in the final two years in the state legislature ( http://www.houstonpress.com/2008-02-28/news/barack-obama-screamed-at-me/print ), as his political godfather, Emil Jones Jr., helped Obama take a lead role in just about every piece of high-profile legislation. By the end of 2003, Obama focused heavily on the upcoming U.S. Senate race.
This brings Obama to the U.S. Senate. His first general election ad ( http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MjJhNDA4M2RiYThiNzQyNjE4MzUxZGRlOWYxZmQ2Y2U= ) touts a bill he didn’t vote for, his signature accomplishment in foreign policy (the nuclear nonprofileration bill) was so uncontroversial it passed by unanimous consent; and with his signature domestic policy accomplishment, ethics reform, nonpartisan observers conclude he has exaggerated ( PolitiFact | Obama's stretch on ethics reform ) his role in passage.
Two years isn’t a lot of time to bring about “real change,” and most of his supporters would concede that Obama’s accomplishments as a freshman senator have been modest. He’s been rebuked by his colleagues ( http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/23/AR2008032301706.html ) for taking credit for legislation he had little role in crafting.
It�??s easy to wonder whether the candidate who talks about “real change” and pledges a government that will “heal the sick” and “stop the oceans from rising” actually knows how to get big things done - or whether he had the patience.
Obama would seem to have the skills and brains to be a legendary community organizer, or state legislator, or U.S. senator. But momentous accomplishments in each of those positions take time, and at each level, Obama hit a wall, and turned his attention to a position of greater power.
I note this as the Boston Globe takes a comprehensive look at Obama’s efforts at housing as a state legislator and as a U.S. senator, and comes to devastating conclusions ( Grim proving ground for Obama's housing policy - The Boston Globe ).
The policy changes Obama pushed have been catastrophic failures for the public, but lucrative for his donors.
[quote] As a state senator, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee coauthored an Illinois law creating a new pool of tax credits for developers. As a US senator, he pressed for increased federal subsidies. And as a presidential candidate, he has campaigned on a promise to create an Affordable Housing Trust Fund that could give developers an estimated $500 million a year.
But a Globe review found that thousands of apartments across Chicago that had been built with local, state, and federal subsidies - including several hundred in Obama's former district - deteriorated so completely that they were no longer habitable.
Grove Parc and several other prominent failures were developed and managed by Obama's close friends and political supporters. Those people profited from the subsidies even as many of Obama's constituents suffered. Tenants lost their homes; surrounding neighborhoods were blighted.
Campaign finance records show that six prominent developers - including Jarrett, Davis, and Rezko - collectively contributed more than $175,000 to Obama's campaigns over the last decade and raised hundreds of thousands more from other donors. Rezko alone raised at least $200,000, by Obama's own accounting.
One of those contributors, Cecil Butler, controlled Lawndale Restoration, the largest subsidized complex in Chicago, which was seized by the government in 2006 after city inspectors found more than 1,800 code violations.[/quote]
Obama has said that his preference for private companies acting as landlords of these developments rather than the Chicago Housing Authority was inspired by his experience with Altgeld Gardens. I can understand that instinct. But one of the problems of constantly moving on to the next promotion is that you never get to see the consequences and ramifications of past actions.[/i]
