North American Union???


Following european steps, bye bye sovereignty…

North American Union to Replace USA?
by Jerome R. Corsi Phd
Posted May 19, 2006

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration’s true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled “Building a North American Community” North American Union to Replace USA?

by Jerome R. Corsi
Posted May 19, 2006

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration’s true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled “Building a North American Community” http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/NorthAmerica_TF_final.pdf
published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration’s actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:

In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush’s speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.

The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union – not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:

The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments? physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.

Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be “vigilantes,” as he has also said in response to a reporter’s question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.

Why doesn?t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won’t do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America’s sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him? published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration’s actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:

In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush’s speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.

The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union – not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:

The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments? physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.

Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be “vigilantes,” as he has also said in response to a reporter’s question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.

Why doesn?t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won’t do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America’s sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?

Article from Newsmax:

More info from mainstream media:

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_455425.html

[quote]jlesk68 wrote:
More info from mainstream media:

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_455425.html[/quote]

A lunatic editorial is not the same thing as legitimate reporting from the main stream media. Nice try.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
jlesk68 wrote:
More info from mainstream media:

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_455425.html

A lunatic editorial is not the same thing as legitimate reporting from the main stream media. Nice try.[/quote]

yeah yeah, any comments on the North American Union???

[quote]jlesk68 wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
jlesk68 wrote:
More info from mainstream media:

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_455425.html

A lunatic editorial is not the same thing as legitimate reporting from the main stream media. Nice try.

yeah yeah, any comments on the North American Union???[/quote]

Not going to happen.

Put all the unemployed Mexicans into an army, with obsolete weapons. Then send 'em to Iraq. Don’t give 'em up to date stuff or they’ll turn 'em on us.

If they clean out Iraq, then those that live get to live here. If they fail or won’t fight, they must stay in Mexico.

Alright, I’m just joking…

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Put all the unemployed Mexicans into an army, with obsolete weapons. Then send 'em to Iraq. Don’t give 'em up to date stuff or they’ll turn 'em on us.

If they clean out Iraq, then those that live get to live here. If they fail or won’t fight, they must stay in Mexico.

Alright, I’m just joking…[/quote]

And can I be the first one to congratulate you on your sence of humor?

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Put all the unemployed Mexicans into an army, with obsolete weapons. Then send 'em to Iraq. Don’t give 'em up to date stuff or they’ll turn 'em on us.

If they clean out Iraq, then those that live get to live here. If they fail or won’t fight, they must stay in Mexico.

Alright, I’m just joking…[/quote]

lol, you may be onto something…

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
jlesk68 wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
jlesk68 wrote:
More info from mainstream media:

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_455425.html

A lunatic editorial is not the same thing as legitimate reporting from the main stream media. Nice try.

yeah yeah, any comments on the North American Union???

Not going to happen.[/quote]

Nope. Not a chance.

This is what I plan on doing when I’m elected president. It’s an idea I like to call the United States of Earth, and some of you like my pal Zap Branigan might notice the flag is used in the Futurama cartoon.

Don’t think of it as losing sovereignty, because that’s retarded. We are actually gaining MORE sovereignty. The OP got the name wrong, though, we aren’t calling it the North American Union, because that’s gay and too French. We are calling it the “North American Coalition”. At least until we annex South America, and then it’s the “American Coalition”. We’ll still have our national identity, because we aren’t erasing any borders or changing any names, it’s just that we’ll have erased trade restrictions between our nations and treat them like state borders.

What’s the big deal? :slight_smile:

Well, I think there are pros and cons to the idea.

In particular, there is a big difference between Canada and Mexico with respect to people teaming across the border.

From the northern side of things, having worked in the US, making it easier for Canadians to work in the US or for Americans to work in Canada could be advantageous.

Believe it or not there isn’t really any driving need for Canadians to run to the US, we are pretty happy up here in general. I suppose it might encourage more multinational marriages though.

I’m not sure what else is proposed… the above portion caught my eye eons ago, but 9/11 put a big ixnay on any and all open border considerations for a while.

I’m not sure the terrorism issue can be overcome with respect to any movement in this direction.

The other fun part to this whole idea is that when other nations around the world who have life pretty much shitty in too many ways to count see how life in Mexico has improved in such a short time, they are gonna want in on the action.

All we have to do is continue to stick to our core values of personal liberty, the democratic process, justice and equality for all, and the rest will take care of itself in time.

This is how tyranny is defeated, and this is how we bridge the gaps between us all to come together as one people of many flavors. Think of a global melting pot.

The folks who stand against us are the xenophobes, ultraconservatives, religious oligarchies, secular tyrants, and the ignorant.

Do you want world peace? True American core ideals are the answer. It’s going to take a tremendous dream and a monumental vision to overcome our innate distrust of one another, but if there’s any dream which can do it, it’s the American Dream.

Cynicism and Fear (same thing, really) is for the weak.

You are definately on to something here.

[quote]lothario1132 wrote:
The OP got the name wrong, though, we aren’t calling it the North American Union, because that’s gay and too French. We are calling it the “North American Coalition”. At least until we annex South America, and then it’s the “American Coalition”. [/quote]

Ha, Ha, I like this idea.

[quote]lothario1132 wrote:
The other fun part to this whole idea is that when other nations around the world who have life pretty much shitty in too many ways to count see how life in Mexico has improved in such a short time, they are gonna want in on the action.

All we have to do is continue to stick to our core values of personal liberty, the democratic process, justice and equality for all, and the rest will take care of itself in time.

This is how tyranny is defeated, and this is how we bridge the gaps between us all to come together as one people of many flavors. Think of a global melting pot.

The folks who stand against us are the xenophobes, ultraconservatives, religious oligarchies, secular tyrants, and the ignorant.

Do you want world peace? True American core ideals are the answer. It’s going to take a tremendous dream and a monumental vision to overcome our innate distrust of one another, but if there’s any dream which can do it, it’s the American Dream.

Cynicism and Fear (same thing, really) is for the weak.[/quote]

The problem is that our cultures are too different right now. Technology and information will break this down over time and THEN the world will be ready for the United States of Earth, but a couple of generations of ‘old-thinkers’ have to die out before this can happen. Maybe in a hundred years…
proving we don’t kill ourselves first.

It’ll be pretty embarrassing if the borders are erased after the 700-mile Border Fence is completed.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

The problem is that our cultures are too different right now. Technology and information will break this down over time and THEN the world will be ready for the United States of Earth, but a couple of generations of ‘old-thinkers’ have to die out before this can happen. Maybe in a hundred years…
proving we don’t kill ourselves first.

[/quote]

We could always lobotomize them all with nanotech weapons. That would get them ready real quick. :wink:

[quote]vroom wrote:
Well, I think there are pros and cons to the idea.

From the northern side of things, having worked in the US, making it easier for Canadians to work in the US or for Americans to work in Canada could be advantageous.
[/quote]

Vroom, I think you’re missing the biggest pro of all. If the US annexes Canada, you’ll get free shipping on all Biotest orders over $150!!

[quote]Varqanir wrote:
It’ll be pretty embarrassing if the borders are erased after the 700-mile Border Fence is completed.[/quote]

That is par for the course for most government work.

I change my vote. It will happen the day after the border fence is completed.