[quote]Dr. Pangloss wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Raw celery FTW
Before you flame, try it. You will thank me.[/quote]
Interesting.
What do you do with it?
[/quote]
Celery has many uses.
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
Celery has many uses.[/quote]
Huh, strungoutboy.
I always pictured you taller.
[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
most women can’t compete with porn in terms of gross sensory-stimulation, you start having trouble with women as your tolerance for sexual stimuli builds.
[/quote]
I dont fully understand this logic. Porn is a 2D image on a computer vs. a real life warm blooded human being. Sure the real girl is not going to fuck like a professional, but real life interaction is superior to images on a screen anyday imho.
[quote]Canuck88 wrote:
Im sure you guys have all heard of this, and if you haven’t it is where you refrain from masturbation and porn. I have had many problems with girls as far as sex goes, problems getting erections, Pre mature, all that stuff…
So as an 18 year old guy i am healthy and fit with good T, so i believe i have been “desensitized” by over masturbation and porn use, numbing my sensation to my partner.
I wanted to see if anyone else has tried it, i am 10 days in and am feeling pretty good,
any feed back would be great![/quote]
No.
I would recommend seeing someone who can do psychoanalysis as the problem is most likely psychological rather than you have a tired cock.
Because everyone deals with partial ED. Has nothing to do with porn or masturbation as it has to do with the fact that you are young and your head isn’t on straight.
[quote]Aggv wrote:
[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
most women can’t compete with porn in terms of gross sensory-stimulation, you start having trouble with women as your tolerance for sexual stimuli builds.
[/quote]
I dont fully understand this logic. Porn is a 2D image on a computer vs. a real life warm blooded human being. Sure the real girl is not going to fuck like a professional, but real life interaction is superior to images on a screen anyday imho. [/quote]
I think it’s just sensory overload. In 5 minutes you can see more naked women, sexual activities, and kinks than you could experience with another person (people) in a lifetime.
It would be like sampling all 32 Baskin Robins flavors until you find the exact flavor you want 95% of the time and and only getting to have vanilla the rest of the time.
[quote]Canuck88 wrote:
[quote]Aero51 wrote:
I had this exact problem with my first girlfriend. I fixed it doing two things
- No porn for 2 weeks
- wanking off less
Zinc supplements can also help you.[/quote]
if i just wank off like once every 2 weeks and eliminate porn will i be cured?[/quote]
Nope. Has to deal with your head. Have to figure out the cause.
[quote]dt79 wrote:
Ok, I do not know if there is some kind of deeper psychological explanation for this, so in the case that there isn’t, the logic here doesn’t jive.
You can get it up for porn. You can’t get it up for your girl. You think porn’s your problem?[/quote]
Exactly.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Aggv wrote:
[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
most women can’t compete with porn in terms of gross sensory-stimulation, you start having trouble with women as your tolerance for sexual stimuli builds.
[/quote]
I dont fully understand this logic. Porn is a 2D image on a computer vs. a real life warm blooded human being. Sure the real girl is not going to fuck like a professional, but real life interaction is superior to images on a screen anyday imho. [/quote]
I think it’s just sensory overload. In 5 minutes you can see more naked women, sexual activities, and kinks than you could experience with another person (people) in a lifetime.
It would be like sampling all 32 Baskin Robins flavors until you find the exact flavor you want 95% of the time and and only getting to have vanilla the rest of the time. [/quote]
But porn is not real life. In order to sample something, you must taste it, and i never touched a porn star through a computer screen.
I might be different with regards to this, but part of the enjoyment with sex is getting the other person off and porn is completely unfulfilling.
[quote]Aggv wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Aggv wrote:
[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
most women can’t compete with porn in terms of gross sensory-stimulation, you start having trouble with women as your tolerance for sexual stimuli builds.
[/quote]
I dont fully understand this logic. Porn is a 2D image on a computer vs. a real life warm blooded human being. Sure the real girl is not going to fuck like a professional, but real life interaction is superior to images on a screen anyday imho. [/quote]
I think it’s just sensory overload. In 5 minutes you can see more naked women, sexual activities, and kinks than you could experience with another person (people) in a lifetime.
It would be like sampling all 32 Baskin Robins flavors until you find the exact flavor you want 95% of the time and and only getting to have vanilla the rest of the time. [/quote]
But porn is not real life. In order to sample something, you must taste it, and i never touched a porn star through a computer screen.
I might be different with regards to this, but part of the enjoyment with sex is getting the other person off and porn is completely unfulfilling.[/quote]
Ya, I agree. I think it’s just over stimulation mentally.
[quote]Aggv wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Aggv wrote:
[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
most women can’t compete with porn in terms of gross sensory-stimulation, you start having trouble with women as your tolerance for sexual stimuli builds.
[/quote]
I dont fully understand this logic. Porn is a 2D image on a computer vs. a real life warm blooded human being. Sure the real girl is not going to fuck like a professional, but real life interaction is superior to images on a screen anyday imho. [/quote]
I think it’s just sensory overload. In 5 minutes you can see more naked women, sexual activities, and kinks than you could experience with another person (people) in a lifetime.
It would be like sampling all 32 Baskin Robins flavors until you find the exact flavor you want 95% of the time and and only getting to have vanilla the rest of the time. [/quote]
But porn is not real life. In order to sample something, you must taste it, and i never touched a porn star through a computer screen.
I might be different with regards to this, but part of the enjoyment with sex is getting the other person off and porn is completely unfulfilling.[/quote]
They are not all that in person, a couple porn chicks go to my gym. If you saw them without makeup and in regular gym clothes, you would think meh.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
They are not all that in person, a couple porn chicks go to my gym. If you saw them without makeup and in regular gym clothes, you would think meh.[/quote]
95% of them look like crap with makeup.
[quote]Aggv wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Aggv wrote:
[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
most women can’t compete with porn in terms of gross sensory-stimulation, you start having trouble with women as your tolerance for sexual stimuli builds.
[/quote]
I dont fully understand this logic. Porn is a 2D image on a computer vs. a real life warm blooded human being. Sure the real girl is not going to fuck like a professional, but real life interaction is superior to images on a screen anyday imho. [/quote]
I think it’s just sensory overload. In 5 minutes you can see more naked women, sexual activities, and kinks than you could experience with another person (people) in a lifetime.
It would be like sampling all 32 Baskin Robins flavors until you find the exact flavor you want 95% of the time and and only getting to have vanilla the rest of the time. [/quote]
But porn is not real life. In order to sample something, you must taste it, and i never touched a porn star through a computer screen.
I might be different with regards to this, but part of the enjoyment with sex is getting the other person off and porn is completely unfulfilling.[/quote]
I agree with you. A naked girl in real life is a million times better than looking at naked girls on the internet. I’m not sure how some guys would rather look at porn and wank it rather than be with a real girl if the option was available.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]Aggv wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Aggv wrote:
[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
most women can’t compete with porn in terms of gross sensory-stimulation, you start having trouble with women as your tolerance for sexual stimuli builds.
[/quote]
I dont fully understand this logic. Porn is a 2D image on a computer vs. a real life warm blooded human being. Sure the real girl is not going to fuck like a professional, but real life interaction is superior to images on a screen anyday imho. [/quote]
I think it’s just sensory overload. In 5 minutes you can see more naked women, sexual activities, and kinks than you could experience with another person (people) in a lifetime.
It would be like sampling all 32 Baskin Robins flavors until you find the exact flavor you want 95% of the time and and only getting to have vanilla the rest of the time. [/quote]
But porn is not real life. In order to sample something, you must taste it, and i never touched a porn star through a computer screen.
I might be different with regards to this, but part of the enjoyment with sex is getting the other person off and porn is completely unfulfilling.[/quote]
They are not all that in person, a couple porn chicks go to my gym. If you saw them without makeup and in regular gym clothes, you would think meh.[/quote]
Hey Max, how was Rising Star in person? Since she hasn’t poked her head in here in about five years, I’m guessing it’s ok for you to be candid.
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
I agree with you. A naked girl in real life is a million times better than looking at naked girls on the internet. I’m not sure how some guys would rather look at porn and wank it rather than be with a real girl if the option was available. [/quote]
Because a girl on a screen will never reject you.
She’ll never say no, she’ll never make you feel shame for your kinks, and she’s always available.
That just seems commonsensical to me. Put a healthy, functional dude in a healthy, functional relationship and there’s less of a need for porn as an alternative to real, live sex.*
- Although sometimes you just want to jerk off to lesbian midgets.
[quote]Aggv wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Aggv wrote:
[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
most women can’t compete with porn in terms of gross sensory-stimulation, you start having trouble with women as your tolerance for sexual stimuli builds.
[/quote]
I dont fully understand this logic. Porn is a 2D image on a computer vs. a real life warm blooded human being. Sure the real girl is not going to fuck like a professional, but real life interaction is superior to images on a screen anyday imho. [/quote]
I think it’s just sensory overload. In 5 minutes you can see more naked women, sexual activities, and kinks than you could experience with another person (people) in a lifetime.
It would be like sampling all 32 Baskin Robins flavors until you find the exact flavor you want 95% of the time and and only getting to have vanilla the rest of the time. [/quote]
But porn is not real life. In order to sample something, you must taste it, and i never touched a porn star through a computer screen.
I might be different with regards to this, but part of the enjoyment with sex is getting the other person off and porn is completely unfulfilling.[/quote]
Because vision trumps all other senses. Hear a piece of information, and three days later you’ll remember 10% of it. Add a picture and you’ll remember 65%. In fact vision takes up half our brain’s resources. So I believe in regards to this topic of porn/real life women, subconsciously your brain is comparing the 6.5 or 7/10 real girl in front of you compared to the hundreds of 9/10 and 10/10 girls on your computer screen.
Aside from the vision thing, I’ve noticed my orgasms are much more intense from masturbating with no external SENSORY stimulation (NOT including mental images from girls I have recently seen) as opposed to masturbating with porn. I’m not sure why this is.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]Dr. Pangloss wrote:
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
I agree with you. A naked girl in real life is a million times better than looking at naked girls on the internet. I’m not sure how some guys would rather look at porn and wank it rather than be with a real girl if the option was available. [/quote]
Because a girl on a screen will never reject you.
She’ll never say no, she’ll never make you feel shame for your kinks, and she’s always available.
That just seems commonsensical to me. Put a healthy, functional dude in a healthy, functional relationship and there’s less of a need for porn as an alternative to real, live sex.*
- Although sometimes you just want to jerk off to lesbian midgets.
[/quote]
You mean lesbian midgets amputees. [/quote]
Add in pregnant and you’ve got a deal!
Canuck88, I’ve got your back. You lay off fapping for a couple of weeks and I’ll double my efforts to keep the universe in balance. Good luck.
[quote]Aggv wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Aggv wrote:
[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
most women can’t compete with porn in terms of gross sensory-stimulation, you start having trouble with women as your tolerance for sexual stimuli builds.
[/quote]
I dont fully understand this logic. Porn is a 2D image on a computer vs. a real life warm blooded human being. Sure the real girl is not going to fuck like a professional, but real life interaction is superior to images on a screen anyday imho. [/quote]
I think it’s just sensory overload. In 5 minutes you can see more naked women, sexual activities, and kinks than you could experience with another person (people) in a lifetime.
It would be like sampling all 32 Baskin Robins flavors until you find the exact flavor you want 95% of the time and and only getting to have vanilla the rest of the time. [/quote]
But porn is not real life. In order to sample something, you must taste it, and i never touched a porn star through a computer screen.
[/quote]
I don’t understand; there are 5 senses (or more), and taste is only one of them. Meth doesn’t have to be tasted to be “sampled,” yet it’s arguably the most addicting thing on the planet.
[quote]
I might be different with regards to this, but part of the enjoyment with sex is getting the other person off and porn is completely unfulfilling.[/quote]
I’m with you on that, but this is not really about sex. It’s about the brain being conditioned to require more intense/varied visual and auditory stimuli than most women can provide in order to become sexually aroused. I understand the theory behind it, but I can’t relate. Anyhow, here’s a link that explains the phenomenon better than I can:
There is a lot more info out there about porn addiction, if you’re interested. With millions of porn videos now just a click away, it’s becoming a bigger problem. A relationship advice web site I visit occasionally has a whole section devoted to helping husbands and wives overcome it so they can salvage their relationships.
[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
[quote]Aggv wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Aggv wrote:
[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
most women can’t compete with porn in terms of gross sensory-stimulation, you start having trouble with women as your tolerance for sexual stimuli builds.
[/quote]
I dont fully understand this logic. Porn is a 2D image on a computer vs. a real life warm blooded human being. Sure the real girl is not going to fuck like a professional, but real life interaction is superior to images on a screen anyday imho. [/quote]
I think it’s just sensory overload. In 5 minutes you can see more naked women, sexual activities, and kinks than you could experience with another person (people) in a lifetime.
It would be like sampling all 32 Baskin Robins flavors until you find the exact flavor you want 95% of the time and and only getting to have vanilla the rest of the time. [/quote]
But porn is not real life. In order to sample something, you must taste it, and i never touched a porn star through a computer screen.
[/quote]
I don’t understand; there are 5 senses (or more), and taste is only one of them. Meth doesn’t have to be tasted to be “sampled,” yet it’s arguably the most addicting thing on the planet.
[quote]
I might be different with regards to this, but part of the enjoyment with sex is getting the other person off and porn is completely unfulfilling.[/quote]
I’m with you on that, but this is not really about sex. It’s about the brain being conditioned to require more intense/varied visual and auditory stimuli than most women can provide in order to become sexually aroused. I understand the theory behind it, but I can’t relate. Anyhow, here’s a link that explains the phenomenon better than I can:
There is a lot more info out there about porn addiction, if you’re interested. With millions of porn videos now just a click away, it’s becoming a bigger problem. A relationship advice web site I visit occasionally has a whole section devoted to helping husbands and wives overcome it so they can salvage their relationships.[/quote]
This is what I was trying to get at Aggv, well said Steel.