NFL Off-Season 2013

Off Topic
881

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Totenkopf wrote:
Is this damning enough evidence for anyone?[/quote]

Looks like a Glock 21 which is 45 ACP. Bet you they check the markings on the bullets they will have the trade markings of passing through a Glock 21 barrel.
It’s nice weapon. What an idiot.[/quote]

I thought Glocks didn’t use ACP ammo? [/quote]

The 21 does.[/quote]

Look at that, you learn something every day.[/quote]

I wonder where he dumped it. It obvious he had one. He probably gave it to one of his Connecticut friends to dump it in the ocean on their way back to Connecticut. Nevertheless, he managed leave enough evidence around that he did in fact possess one, so even if they don’t find it they can show the bullet came out of a glock and it matches the gun in the pictures. I think he’s done. ‘Pound-me-in-the-ass’ prison is his future.

882

[quote]farmerson12 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Totenkopf wrote:
Is this damning enough evidence for anyone?[/quote]

Looks like a Glock 21 which is 45 ACP. Bet you they check the markings on the bullets they will have the trade markings of passing through a Glock 21 barrel.
It’s nice weapon. What an idiot.[/quote]

I thought Glocks didn’t use ACP ammo? [/quote]

The 21 does.[/quote]

Look at that, you learn something every day.[/quote]

I wouldn’t mind having one. That or the SR45, nothing like a nice high capacity 45. Of course, you don’t go around popping caps in peoples asses and dumping them in an industrial park. You wait until someone tries to kill your or your family, then you shoot them.[/quote]

I have a SR40c and SR45. Both are pretty nice for being on the cheaper end. Id rather use my XD but still, they have been solid.[/quote]

I have heard the comparo’s between the SR’s and other models. And while the XD’s, glocks and smiths have been touted as better feeling and better shooting, there is no getting around the fact the the SR’s have been consistently more accurate than many guns that are way more expensive. I am a big Ruger fan. It ain’t about cheap, they make damn solid pistols, price be damned.

883

.

884

720×404 48.8 KB

You’re so 2,000 and late…

885

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]farmerson12 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Totenkopf wrote:
Is this damning enough evidence for anyone?[/quote]

Looks like a Glock 21 which is 45 ACP. Bet you they check the markings on the bullets they will have the trade markings of passing through a Glock 21 barrel.
It’s nice weapon. What an idiot.[/quote]

I thought Glocks didn’t use ACP ammo? [/quote]

The 21 does.[/quote]

Look at that, you learn something every day.[/quote]

I wouldn’t mind having one. That or the SR45, nothing like a nice high capacity 45. Of course, you don’t go around popping caps in peoples asses and dumping them in an industrial park. You wait until someone tries to kill your or your family, then you shoot them.[/quote]

I have a SR40c and SR45. Both are pretty nice for being on the cheaper end. Id rather use my XD but still, they have been solid.[/quote]

I have heard the comparo’s between the SR’s and other models. And while the XD’s, glocks and smiths have been touted as better feeling and better shooting, there is no getting around the fact the the SR’s have been consistently more accurate than many guns that are way more expensive. I am a big Ruger fan. It ain’t about cheap, they make damn solid pistols, price be damned.[/quote]

Dont get me wrong, Ive had no issues with accuracy(on the gun’s part) or durability with the SRs. I do feel a difference in the handling and that is more than likely due to my experience with the XD. Ive shot them 3 times more than the SRs

886

[quote]farmerson12 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]farmerson12 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Totenkopf wrote:
Is this damning enough evidence for anyone?[/quote]

Looks like a Glock 21 which is 45 ACP. Bet you they check the markings on the bullets they will have the trade markings of passing through a Glock 21 barrel.
It’s nice weapon. What an idiot.[/quote]

I thought Glocks didn’t use ACP ammo? [/quote]

The 21 does.[/quote]

Look at that, you learn something every day.[/quote]

I wouldn’t mind having one. That or the SR45, nothing like a nice high capacity 45. Of course, you don’t go around popping caps in peoples asses and dumping them in an industrial park. You wait until someone tries to kill your or your family, then you shoot them.[/quote]

I have a SR40c and SR45. Both are pretty nice for being on the cheaper end. Id rather use my XD but still, they have been solid.[/quote]

I have heard the comparo’s between the SR’s and other models. And while the XD’s, glocks and smiths have been touted as better feeling and better shooting, there is no getting around the fact the the SR’s have been consistently more accurate than many guns that are way more expensive. I am a big Ruger fan. It ain’t about cheap, they make damn solid pistols, price be damned.[/quote]

Dont get me wrong, Ive had no issues with accuracy(on the gun’s part) or durability with the SRs. I do feel a difference in the handling and that is more than likely due to my experience with the XD. Ive shot them 3 times more than the SRs[/quote]

My brother picked up a CZ75 and it has to be the finest handgun I’ve ever held. What do you think of CZs?

887

[quote]Totenkopf wrote:

[quote]farmerson12 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]farmerson12 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Totenkopf wrote:
Is this damning enough evidence for anyone?[/quote]

Looks like a Glock 21 which is 45 ACP. Bet you they check the markings on the bullets they will have the trade markings of passing through a Glock 21 barrel.
It’s nice weapon. What an idiot.[/quote]

I thought Glocks didn’t use ACP ammo? [/quote]

The 21 does.[/quote]

Look at that, you learn something every day.[/quote]

I wouldn’t mind having one. That or the SR45, nothing like a nice high capacity 45. Of course, you don’t go around popping caps in peoples asses and dumping them in an industrial park. You wait until someone tries to kill your or your family, then you shoot them.[/quote]

I have a SR40c and SR45. Both are pretty nice for being on the cheaper end. Id rather use my XD but still, they have been solid.[/quote]

I have heard the comparo’s between the SR’s and other models. And while the XD’s, glocks and smiths have been touted as better feeling and better shooting, there is no getting around the fact the the SR’s have been consistently more accurate than many guns that are way more expensive. I am a big Ruger fan. It ain’t about cheap, they make damn solid pistols, price be damned.[/quote]

Dont get me wrong, Ive had no issues with accuracy(on the gun’s part) or durability with the SRs. I do feel a difference in the handling and that is more than likely due to my experience with the XD. Ive shot them 3 times more than the SRs[/quote]

My brother picked up a CZ75 and it has to be the finest handgun I’ve ever held. What do you think of CZs?
[/quote]

They have an excellent repuatation. In fact, for their price, I suprised I never bought one.Their reputation in the States is low due to it being seen as a “commie gun” in the 70s and 80s but of course that is dying off. A buddy had a 75 with a replaced firing pin and extractor. The best 9mm Ive shot. Love the recoil and ergonomics. I actually dont own a 9mm but when I decide to get one, that will proably be my choice.

888

[quote]Totenkopf wrote:

[quote]farmerson12 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]farmerson12 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Totenkopf wrote:
Is this damning enough evidence for anyone?[/quote]

Looks like a Glock 21 which is 45 ACP. Bet you they check the markings on the bullets they will have the trade markings of passing through a Glock 21 barrel.
It’s nice weapon. What an idiot.[/quote]

I thought Glocks didn’t use ACP ammo? [/quote]

The 21 does.[/quote]

Look at that, you learn something every day.[/quote]

I wouldn’t mind having one. That or the SR45, nothing like a nice high capacity 45. Of course, you don’t go around popping caps in peoples asses and dumping them in an industrial park. You wait until someone tries to kill your or your family, then you shoot them.[/quote]

I have a SR40c and SR45. Both are pretty nice for being on the cheaper end. Id rather use my XD but still, they have been solid.[/quote]

I have heard the comparo’s between the SR’s and other models. And while the XD’s, glocks and smiths have been touted as better feeling and better shooting, there is no getting around the fact the the SR’s have been consistently more accurate than many guns that are way more expensive. I am a big Ruger fan. It ain’t about cheap, they make damn solid pistols, price be damned.[/quote]

Dont get me wrong, Ive had no issues with accuracy(on the gun’s part) or durability with the SRs. I do feel a difference in the handling and that is more than likely due to my experience with the XD. Ive shot them 3 times more than the SRs[/quote]

My brother picked up a CZ75 and it has to be the finest handgun I’ve ever held. What do you think of CZs?
[/quote]

I have handled them, but never shot one. They seem pretty nice to me. And it speaks to me in that they are made in my family homeland. I wouldn’t turn one down.

889

[quote]farmerson12 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]farmerson12 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Totenkopf wrote:
Is this damning enough evidence for anyone?[/quote]

Looks like a Glock 21 which is 45 ACP. Bet you they check the markings on the bullets they will have the trade markings of passing through a Glock 21 barrel.
It’s nice weapon. What an idiot.[/quote]

I thought Glocks didn’t use ACP ammo? [/quote]

The 21 does.[/quote]

Look at that, you learn something every day.[/quote]

I wouldn’t mind having one. That or the SR45, nothing like a nice high capacity 45. Of course, you don’t go around popping caps in peoples asses and dumping them in an industrial park. You wait until someone tries to kill your or your family, then you shoot them.[/quote]

I have a SR40c and SR45. Both are pretty nice for being on the cheaper end. Id rather use my XD but still, they have been solid.[/quote]

I have heard the comparo’s between the SR’s and other models. And while the XD’s, glocks and smiths have been touted as better feeling and better shooting, there is no getting around the fact the the SR’s have been consistently more accurate than many guns that are way more expensive. I am a big Ruger fan. It ain’t about cheap, they make damn solid pistols, price be damned.[/quote]

Dont get me wrong, Ive had no issues with accuracy(on the gun’s part) or durability with the SRs. I do feel a difference in the handling and that is more than likely due to my experience with the XD. Ive shot them 3 times more than the SRs[/quote]

I almost pulled the trigger (no pun intended) on buying one the other day actually, but I wanted something a little slimmer for carry. The grip and trigger was really nice.

The XD going to be under consideration when I go for a full size 9. I really like the M&P and the XD for a full size competition gun. I am thinking about doing some local small time competitions. Just for fun and to get better. I have turned into a pretty good shot, so it’s something I think I would have fun doing. I could do it with my 1911, but I also need an excuse to buy another gun :slight_smile:

890

You know, I think I am going to start a separate thread for the Hernandez trial. I think it deserves it’s own. It’s definitely going to be interesting to watch.

891

[quote]pat wrote:
You know, I think I am going to start a separate thread for the Hernandez trial. I think it deserves it’s own. It’s definitely going to be interesting to watch.[/quote]
It got darker when hes allegedly killed 2 other guys on top of Lloyd.

892

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:

[quote]Totenkopf wrote:
Is this damning enough evidence for anyone?[/quote]
Seriously, what a fucking idiot. If he ends up being guilty, I hope he gets put away for a long time and isn’t given any leniency because he is a professional athlete. [/quote]

If he isn’t put into protective custody he’s fucked once he gets put into the general population. I’ve heard that he has gang ties, and I’m sure the comment about Lloyd talking to people Hernandez “had trouble with” is related to those ties. That, plus the fact that he’s a high-profile athlete, makes him a big target in there.

And judging by the way he pulled up and short-armed a pass to him over the middle and fumbled it after getting rocked on the previous play by Dashon Goldson in last year’s Patriots/Niners matchup, he’s not the toughest guy in the world.[/quote]

He wasn’t the same player after that game, than he was before it. He had a hard time understanding the Brady run offense and was often in the wrong place at the wrong time, and appeared to be at the peak of his understanding of the system last year. (As in, he wasn’t going to “get it” anymore than he already did, and was still unreliable at times.)

That said… He was still a productive gang banger that was a good football player.

So sad, so many lives ruined I his wake. His child’s included.

893

You guys see this?

894

I have seen that white box on here before.

895

You’re a white box!!

Check again

896

[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
You’re a white box!!

Check again[/quote]
Lol.

897

Ocho’s rebuttle! (hopefully no white box Derek!)

898

Jesus. I’ll be honest, it looks like Chad had a bit more in the tank too…

899

I know Chad’s is only like 1mph slower but the other guys LOOKS way more amazing due to crappy camera quality making his legs look like Road Runners. I love my man Chad though. Minus a few points for headbutting the ex, he is still one of the coolest players

900

Bumped since Derek is jonesing and the HoF game is only 22 days away…

To answer your Q’s from the Pacific Rim thread (so as to avoid further hijacking):

I think they’re looking at a down year unless they get some big contributions from unproven players and rookies.

The offense will suffer without Wallace, even though he didn’t contribute to the level that he’s capable of last year. I think that was mostly an attitude thing though because of the holdout and him not getting what he wanted. I can see him putting up Pro-Bowl numbers this year with Tannehill firing bombs his way, but it still won’t justify that monster contract, at least not in my mind.

I think the OL should be improved IF they stay healthy. That’s a big “if” because it seems like they never are. Hopefully that means Ben stays healthy. He will win them 10 games if he doesn’t get hurt.

Maybe. The OL is a question mark, but the bigger question is, can the RBs hold onto the ball? Fumbles cost them at least two games last year and ultimately a playoff spot. I’ll be interested to see what Le’Veon (how do you even begin to pronounce that?) Bell can do. I don’t know much about him.

The DL prospects haven’t lived up to expectations so far, and a lot is going to be required of them this year with Hampton gone and Keisel another year older. Apparently the NT job is Steve McClendon’s. I like him, but he’s untested as a full-time starter and there’s NOBODY behind him. Alameda Ta’amu was supposed to be Casey’s successor but as far as I know he was released because he’s an asshole off the field. Everyone else on the roster at the position isn’t much more than a camp body.

Losing Keenan Lewis is going to hurt. Ike is getting up there in years, and Cortez Allen is capable but unproven as a starter. Though apparently Polamalu is in the best condition he’s been in since college, so maybe he’ll be able to stay off the injury report this year. I’m not confident though.

I think the LBs are going to be the strength of the defense, especially if Jarvis Jones can get on the field this year. I love the tape I’ve seen of him. I have little faith in Jason Worilds on the right side. He excelled when replacing Woodley, but really seems to disappear when he’s on the right side. Not sure why. Woodley is also reportedly in great shape this year. But like with Troy, it’s anyone’s guess how healthy he’ll be this year. Timmons will be a beast, and Foote will be solid but unspectacular.