[quote]MattyXL wrote:
Even though they were severely over matched, I came away being a fan of Pryor, he impressed me, had a nice touch and strong arm, obviously has legs. If the Raiders had any weapons he can really be a QB to build around. [/quote]
Agreed
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Kapernick is not a drop-back passer, there is no point in putting him in that style of offense.
He looks very uncomfortable in the pocket, he is a scrambling QB that should be doing playaction passes, bootlegs, and plays where he rolls out.
His ability means you need nickelbacks in the game, which makes Gore’s running game better.
This is more of Harbaugh’s fault than anything else, he has the wrong offense for his personnel.[/quote]
Whoa there partner
DB has decided Kap can do it all.
Did you not get the memo?
We may need you to move your desk down to the basement…yea…[/quote]
Words[/quote]
DB love you bro, its all in good fun.
[quote]MattyXL wrote:
Even though they were severely over matched, I came away being a fan of Pryor, he impressed me, had a nice touch and strong arm, obviously has legs. If the Raiders had any weapons he can really be a QB to build around. [/quote]
If I’m a Raiders fan, it’s certainly the silver lining of a dark cloud. His receivers had some awful performances.
From the bits and pieces I watched I thought Denarius Moore played well- no?
Manning is a machine. I honestly don’t see how they are going to lose a game this year.
@RJinVegas: Updated SB odds: Den 3/1; Sea 7/2; NE, SF, NO 10/1; GB, Chic 12/1; Cin 14/1; Hou, Dal 20/1; KC, Bal, Mia 25/1
It’s hard to see someone upsetting Denver. Possibly Cincy? NE should improve with Gronk and Amendola back. But damn Denver is rollin
Hi haters! Thinking pizza for breakfast. Ya’ll can have the crust…from my undies.
[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
@RJinVegas: Updated SB odds: Den 3/1; Sea 7/2; NE, SF, NO 10/1; GB, Chic 12/1; Cin 14/1; Hou, Dal 20/1; KC, Bal, Mia 25/1
It’s hard to see someone upsetting Denver. Possibly Cincy? NE should improve with Gronk and Amendola back. But damn Denver is rollin[/quote]
Mia 25-1?
[quote]Waittz wrote:
[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
@RJinVegas: Updated SB odds: Den 3/1; Sea 7/2; NE, SF, NO 10/1; GB, Chic 12/1; Cin 14/1; Hou, Dal 20/1; KC, Bal, Mia 25/1
It’s hard to see someone upsetting Denver. Possibly Cincy? NE should improve with Gronk and Amendola back. But damn Denver is rollin[/quote]
Mia 25-1?
Lol indeed. But I think it speaks more about the AFC than the Fins
[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
[quote]Waittz wrote:
[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
@RJinVegas: Updated SB odds: Den 3/1; Sea 7/2; NE, SF, NO 10/1; GB, Chic 12/1; Cin 14/1; Hou, Dal 20/1; KC, Bal, Mia 25/1
It’s hard to see someone upsetting Denver. Possibly Cincy? NE should improve with Gronk and Amendola back. But damn Denver is rollin[/quote]
Mia 25-1?
[/quote]
Lol indeed. But I think it speaks more about the AFC than the Fins[/quote]
Not sure I agree. The NFC has 4 winless teams and only 5 teams with winning records right now. Saints/Seahawks look good, dont get me wrong, but The Boys, Bears and Cowardly lions dont really look like powerhouse teams. Granted it’s early, but the NFC looks Charmin soft this year. Hell, the NFC East may verwell send an 8-8 team to the playoffs. Even when Toilet bowl teams collide like the Jets/Buc, Browns/Vikes Carolina/Buff The AFC stinker teams walked away with a W.
[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
From the bits and pieces I watched I thought Denarius Moore played well- no?
Manning is a machine. I honestly don’t see how they are going to lose a game this year. [/quote]
They have to play in Kansas City, that will be a tough matchup.
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
From the bits and pieces I watched I thought Denarius Moore played well- no?
Manning is a machine. I honestly don’t see how they are going to lose a game this year. [/quote]
They have to play in Kansas City, that will be a tough matchup. [/quote]
I agree it will be toughER than the Raiders but let’s not go thinking that Manning and Co. won’t walk out with the W. I’ll wager my life on it!!!
[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
From the bits and pieces I watched I thought Denarius Moore played well- no?
Manning is a machine. I honestly don’t see how they are going to lose a game this year. [/quote]
They have to play in Kansas City, that will be a tough matchup. [/quote]
I agree it will be toughER than the Raiders but let’s not go thinking that Manning and Co. won’t walk out with the W. I’ll wager my life on it!!![/quote]
If i take that wager, do I get to kill you after Alex Smith beats Payton? Trick question, the appocolypse is already on hand if that senario plays out.
[quote]Waittz wrote:
[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
From the bits and pieces I watched I thought Denarius Moore played well- no?
Manning is a machine. I honestly don’t see how they are going to lose a game this year. [/quote]
They have to play in Kansas City, that will be a tough matchup. [/quote]
I agree it will be toughER than the Raiders but let’s not go thinking that Manning and Co. won’t walk out with the W. I’ll wager my life on it!!![/quote]
If i take that wager, do I get to kill you after Alex Smith beats Payton? Trick question, the appocolypse is already on hand if that senario plays out.[/quote]
A deal is a deal, so yes. My only stipulations are that you still have to manage my fantasy teams and you will have to abide by the bet DB and I have regarding the WAS-SF game. Oh, and you have to dress me to the nines for my funeral since you know how to dress. Ok?
I figure the apocalypse isn’t immediate so you will have time to handle those requests…
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
You guys all lambasted me over and over and over for declaring him the next Big Thing after 10 starts. I suggest some of you follow your own advice and reserve the “overrated” comments until he’s played more than 2 awful games. If this shit continues through the rest of the first half and he doesn’t make some needed adjustments, have at it. But until then, let’s just settle down with all the overreactions. .[/quote]
lol dude. It is all good. Kap better be fine, I have fantasy $ on it lol.
It is just fun to bust your balls, mainly because you are very adult and well adjusted about it. ANd you love the 9ers so dman much it is great to watch you pontificate.
Glennon getting the start over Freeman this week.
[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
Glennon getting the start over Freeman this week.[/quote]
Didn’t freeman just sign a big contract?
Freeman should go to the Jags. I feel like he started to suck ever since Schiano took over the team.
I can’t wrap my head around what happened here. I would think the glove would have been enough protection to prevent your fingers from falling apart
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Kapernick is not a drop-back passer, there is no point in putting him in that style of offense.
He looks very uncomfortable in the pocket, he is a scrambling QB that should be doing playaction passes, bootlegs, and plays where he rolls out.
His ability means you need nickelbacks in the game, which makes Gore’s running game better.
This is more of Harbaugh’s fault than anything else, he has the wrong offense for his personnel.[/quote]
Whoa there partner
DB has decided Kap can do it all.
Did you not get the memo?
We may need you to move your desk down to the basement…yea…[/quote]
Words[/quote]
DB love you bro, its all in good fun.[/quote]
Then why aren’t I having any fun?
[quote]MattyXL wrote:
Sweet Pea FTMFW[/quote]
You owe me an avatar, pal. Check the MLB thread.