[quote]silverblood wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]GrizzlyBerg wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
I don’t understand the Bradshaw pick, though. All of the other great QBs mentioned thus far were the driving force on their teams. But Bradshaw played second fiddle to that defense his whole career. I think that makes him a special case compared to other QBs with 2+ rings.
[/quote]
On Mike and Mike Bradshaw even admitted that despite his four rings he isn’t even in the top 5 quarterbacks of all time. [/quote]
I mean, I hear you guys, and I’m not saying my opinion is gold, but I put Bradshaw and Montana in the top class, Brady a distant third, and Aikman/Manning giving him a flat tire.
The reason I put Bradshaw there is because 4 rings is hard to discount, irrelevant of the team around you. You’re still the leader on offense and have to have your shit together to win 4 damn times.
Fair points for those that don’t think he belongs, but I do is all. [/quote]
a “great” qb is why the broncos won the SB! wait a sec…
I was a cowboy fan when Bradshaw had his run. I hated the steelers and thought TB was the best qb there was. then came Montana, another winner. neither were my teams but I give credit where credit is due. people always put down winners when it isn’t their team.
a few “great” qb’s that didn’t or haven’t yet won a sb-Dan Marino, John Hadl, Ken Anderson, Steve McNair, Fran Tarkenton, Tony Romo, Dan Fouts, Jim Kelly, Warren Moon, Philip Rivers, Donovan McNabb, Matt Ryan.
now it’s almost time for the 2014 free agent/draft thread to start!
[/quote]
The fact that you put Matt Ryan, Tony Romo, Philip Rivers, Steve McNair, and Donovan McNabb in the same category as Kelly, Marino, and Tarkenton raises some serious credibility issues for you.