I dont know who Cowboys a kockin is on the TN Fantasy League but dude you totally should of had this match. Moreno saved me from Campbell and Sproles being out.
[quote]postholedigger wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Tony Carter – what a freaking bonehead. You DON’T need to make that kind of mistake in overtime for crying out loud. I learned not to fuck up like that back in elementary school. Sheesh.
[/quote]
To be fair to Carter, Welker needed to call that WAAAY earlier than that.
…but as a Patriots fan, I’m glad he didn’t.[/quote]
The Pats totally obamacared the first half last night, total disaster.
However, If you take away the fumble for 6, and the short field touchdown, the D only let up 17 points to one of the greatest offenses in the NFL right now… Considering the injury’s on that side of the ball, it is promising.
That win by the Pats was combination of determination, Broncos choking and dumb play calling. Denver should have just run the ball every down, lol. Would have won by 24.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]postholedigger wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Tony Carter – what a freaking bonehead. You DON’T need to make that kind of mistake in overtime for crying out loud. I learned not to fuck up like that back in elementary school. Sheesh.
[/quote]
To be fair to Carter, Welker needed to call that WAAAY earlier than that.
…but as a Patriots fan, I’m glad he didn’t.[/quote]
The Pats totally obamacared the first half last night, total disaster.
However, If you take away the fumble for 6, and the short field touchdown, the D only let up 17 points to one of the greatest offenses in the NFL right now… Considering the injury’s on that side of the ball, it is promising.
That win by the Pats was combination of determination, Broncos choking and dumb play calling. Denver should have just run the ball every down, lol. Would have won by 24.[/quote]
If Moreno could have run the ball 60 times by himself I might would agree with you but the others are such a cluster fuck you never know what they are going to do.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
…Denver should have just run the ball every down, lol. Would have won by 24.
[/quote]
Agreed.
Manning sat on the sideline shivering like a cheerleader in a short skirt. Poor guy was cold. Needs to grow a beard and eat hot soup before the game. Buck the fuck up, Peyton.
Too many seasons of toasty luxury in Indy’s dome, I guess.
[/quote]
He seems to fold in the cold, and Manning, unlike his little brother, seems to thrive in low pressure situations, and stumble when the going gets tough. Given that Indy team, he should have won at least 1 more ring, if not be sitting on 3 or 4.
I don’t know, maybe I ask too much, but Brady won 3 with lessor offenses. (Better D’s, but lessor offenses.)
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
…Denver should have just run the ball every down, lol. Would have won by 24.
[/quote]
Agreed.
Manning sat on the sideline shivering like a cheerleader in a short skirt. Poor guy was cold. Needs to grow a beard and eat hot soup before the game. Buck the fuck up, Peyton.
Too many seasons of toasty luxury in Indy’s dome, I guess.
[/quote]
He seems to fold in the cold, and Manning, unlike his little brother, seems to thrive in low pressure situations, and stumble when the going gets tough. Given that Indy team, he should have won at least 1 more ring, if not be sitting on 3 or 4.
I don’t know, maybe I ask too much, but Brady won 3 with lessor offenses. (Better D’s, but lessor offenses.)[/quote]
Brady’s offenses were not quite as good as Peyton’s but his defenses were worlds better. Peyton never played with a defense that was capable of winning a championship. That Bruschi, McGinnest, Law, Harrison, Seymour, Vrabel def that Brady won his 3 with was one of the better (and more underrated) defenses ever. Without those defense’s there isn’t even a discussion about which one is better because Brady barely sniffs the playoffs every year. Hell, Matt Cassell won 8 games with them so that should tell you something huge right there. You think if Peyton only manages to put up 17 against the “greatest show on turf” that the Colts d has them in a position for Vanderjact to win the game??
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
…Denver should have just run the ball every down, lol. Would have won by 24.
[/quote]
Agreed.
Manning sat on the sideline shivering like a cheerleader in a short skirt. Poor guy was cold. Needs to grow a beard and eat hot soup before the game. Buck the fuck up, Peyton.
Too many seasons of toasty luxury in Indy’s dome, I guess.
[/quote]
He seems to fold in the cold, and Manning, unlike his little brother, seems to thrive in low pressure situations, and stumble when the going gets tough. Given that Indy team, he should have won at least 1 more ring, if not be sitting on 3 or 4.
I don’t know, maybe I ask too much, but Brady won 3 with lessor offenses. (Better D’s, but lessor offenses.)[/quote]
Brady’s offenses were not quite as good as Peyton’s but his defenses were worlds better. Peyton never played with a defense that was capable of winning a championship. That Bruschi, McGinnest, Law, Harrison, Seymour, Vrabel def that Brady won his 3 with was one of the better (and more underrated) defenses ever. Without those defense’s there isn’t even a discussion about which one is better because Brady barely sniffs the playoffs every year. Hell, Matt Cassell won 8 games with them so that should tell you something huge right there. You think if Peyton only manages to put up 17 against the “greatest show on turf” that the Colts d has them in a position for Vanderjact to win the game??[/quote]
Kind of dumb to say that. Brady has out performed Manning as far as playoff numbers go with less weapons on offense except for the one year the Pats went undefeated during the regular season. I just think Brady is better as far as the postseason goes.
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
…Denver should have just run the ball every down, lol. Would have won by 24.
[/quote]
Agreed.
Manning sat on the sideline shivering like a cheerleader in a short skirt. Poor guy was cold. Needs to grow a beard and eat hot soup before the game. Buck the fuck up, Peyton.
Too many seasons of toasty luxury in Indy’s dome, I guess.
[/quote]
He seems to fold in the cold, and Manning, unlike his little brother, seems to thrive in low pressure situations, and stumble when the going gets tough. Given that Indy team, he should have won at least 1 more ring, if not be sitting on 3 or 4.
I don’t know, maybe I ask too much, but Brady won 3 with lessor offenses. (Better D’s, but lessor offenses.)[/quote]
Brady’s offenses were not quite as good as Peyton’s but his defenses were worlds better. Peyton never played with a defense that was capable of winning a championship. That Bruschi, McGinnest, Law, Harrison, Seymour, Vrabel def that Brady won his 3 with was one of the better (and more underrated) defenses ever. Without those defense’s there isn’t even a discussion about which one is better because Brady barely sniffs the playoffs every year. Hell, Matt Cassell won 8 games with them so that should tell you something huge right there. You think if Peyton only manages to put up 17 against the “greatest show on turf” that the Colts d has them in a position for Vanderjact to win the game??[/quote]
Kind of dumb to say that. Brady has out performed Manning as far as playoff numbers go with less weapons on offense except for the one year the Pats went undefeated during the regular season. I just think Brady is better as far as the postseason goes. [/quote]
He has better playoff numbers because he didn’t have to force the issue because he had a team he could depend on to win. Peyton didn’t have that luxury. It was up to him, Marvin and Reggie to basically put up so many points that the other teams couldn’t keep up and Freeney or Mathis couldn’t sneak in their and get a sack when they put teams in throw only mode. Brady knew that with that defense as long as he played solid he would never be out of a game. Plus, without Brady, Belichek is still a great coach, without Manning, Dungy was a great def coordinator who couldn’t hack it as a head coach.
[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
I dont know who Cowboys a kockin is on the TN Fantasy League but dude you totally should of had this match. Moreno saved me from Campbell and Sproles being out. [/quote]
My team did awful so its not surprising I lost. Big ben on my bench outscored Peyton
Washington needs to pull RG3 and let him heal.
He took an absolute beating last night and obviously isn’t 100%. Washington should put him on the shelves, let him heal up and focus on next season. No sense in getting Griffin hurt in this busted season and screwing themselves long term.
From a lifelong 49ers fan, last night was hard to watch. RG3 was getting crushed on every other play and he is a player that I like.
[quote]gregron wrote:
Washington needs to pull RG3 and let him heal.
He took an absolute beating last night and obviously isn’t 100%. Washington should put him on the shelves, let him heal up and focus on next season. No sense in getting Griffin hurt in this busted season and screwing themselves long term.
From a lifelong 49ers fan, last night was hard to watch. RG3 was getting crushed on every other play and he is a player that I like.[/quote]
I don’t think his health is an issue at this point. I didn’t see him grimacing (other than that groin kick) and he is running pretty well now. I DON’T believe he should be pulled. Unless they are going to make a switch to Kirk Cousins and give up on our 1st round pick already, he is the QB. Drew Brees wasn’t pulled last year when the team was awful. Matt Ryan isn’t pulled this year. He is the face of the franchise now and he needs to take the good and the bad. Unfortunately there is a lot of bad.
This team needs some serious work and I think Shanahan should be let go at the end of this season. The drama created b/w Shanny and RG3 will not go away and unfortunately I think this locker room is in a sort of turmoil b/c of it. Plus I hate Kyle Shanahan (even last year I hated him). The defense needs to get blown up, ST is atrocious, our OL needs work, and we need another WR to make Garcon WR2. Not to mention Griffin looks like shit when he does get time but he also seems to have kind of lost a little of the emotions and fire that I liked about him.
I am starting the call for Gruden to make his way into DC. He’s got love for RG3, he’s got the young fiery mentality that this young team needs, and he can get that defense whipped into shape. Shanny has been held back due to the cap penalty but unfortunately I just think there is bad blood and it’s time to move on.
Last night was beyond disappointing. I was expecting a loss. I wasn’t expecting that bad of play. We look horrible in every facet. If last year hadn’t been so awesome this would be ok b/c we’ve been mediocre (or bad) for so long. It seems extra depressing due to last years run though.
Now I just have to sit and wait for that db DB to show up. Dude leaves the forum forever and now gets to come in here and rub my nose in it. Ballsack!
Lol Nate, its not like the 49rs are tearing it up this year.
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
Lol Nate, its not like the 49rs are tearing it up this year.[/quote]
I know. I’m just extra agitated after that steaming pile of dog shit we produced last night. I think I could have gotten more than 12 yards in 1 half of football by myself.
My girl wants to get me tickets to a game for early XMas present and I’m debating on just telling her to put the money in a jar so I can go to 2 games next year! I sort of want to go to the Dallas-Skins game though…
I watched some of the game last night, but went to bed at halftime.
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
I watched some of the game last night, but went to bed at halftime. [/quote]
I think the entire team did the same thing
[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
I watched some of the game last night, but went to bed at halftime. [/quote]
I think the entire team did the same thing[/quote]
I say there’s an 80% chance RG3 is hurt before the season is over.
He took at least 15 big hits last night. They’re asking for another serious injury.
[quote]gregron wrote:
I say there’s an 80% chance RG3 is hurt before the season is over.
He took at least 15 big hits last night. They’re asking for another serious injury.[/quote]
I don’t disagree with you. But he is #21 in number of sacks (1 being the most) and #9 in total QB hits. So he’s not an outlier or anything. He’s getting more than he should due to the shitty line right now but he wasn’t drafted to wear a red shirt. He’s got to play ball and that’s part of it.
The whole team is dysfunctional. Kirk Cousins will get murdered out there too. It’s just going to be a long 5 weeks…
Washington needs to win some games.
[quote]jjackkrash wrote:
Washington needs to win some games.
[/quote]
Hindsight being what it is, god that deal looks really bad for Washington.
3 firsts is too much for 99.99% of players in the NFL. I mean… You have to hit homerun after homerun in FA in order to compensate for that.