NFL 2013 Part 2

I didn’t doubt denver would come back from a 14 point deficit. Von miller was clutch with that hammer fist!!
Jets had no chance to stop ad so many good receivers on that team.

[quote]red04 wrote:
So that Calvin Johnson guy is pretty good I guess.[/quote]

Yeah he’s ok

The ending of that Dallas Detroit game was awesome. I was really hoping that Skins Denver was going to stay a low scoring affair and we were looking great for a while. Once again our offense was suspect leading to a Defense that can’t get a rest. Not sure why RG3 didn’t roll out at all since the run was doing pretty well for us.

Also, I’m annoyed that they pulled RG3. His knee was fine and now they are coddling him too much

Yeah man I agree, the read option qb’s were made for running, each game is now meaningful. They should be trying to get 1st downs at any cost. Apparently the cowboys could have ran out the clock? I wasn’t watching the game so someone fill me in. Even with the jets getting whooped there was still good football to be watched.

Aaron rodgers was looking good last night Pryor had a 90 yard run lol, and someone on the vikes tied cromarties return record. Niice plays in the higlights, liked the jets back up qb trying to hurdle the defender ahaha never seen a white guy jump so high. I think the jets defence is gonna have to tighten the hell up for next game I still like there chances vs No thisweek.

With the 3 losses in the NFC Least, the Giants are actually back in the run in the division with their 2 wins. Damn thats sad.

It’s quite remarkable actually. I feel like the other teams are really just waiting for RG3 to get it going. Remember, the Skins were 3-6 and counted out for the season already last year!!!

SB here we come!!

[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
It’s quite remarkable actually. I feel like the other teams are really just waiting for RG3 to get it going. Remember, the Skins were 3-6 and counted out for the season already last year!!!

SB here we come!![/quote]
Should be a good game next week with the Chargers.

Megatron deserves a ton of praise for those 329 rec yds but the single-game yardage record still does belong to Flipper Anderson. (here he is winning a playoff game in style)

Fucking Seatlle man. Rams dominated them and should have won that game. With Bradford in the game I think they would have won for sure. Makes me think when Seattle goes to San Fran that the Niners will hand it to them. They look very ordinary on the road.

Seattle played awful. Wow. But the D came up huge at the end. I’ll take 7-1.

[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
Fucking Seatlle man. Rams dominated them and should have won that game. With Bradford in the game I think they would have won for sure. Makes me think when Seattle goes to San Fran that the Niners will hand it to them. They look very ordinary on the road.[/quote]
Seattle is not even close to the same team when they aren’t at home.

If they get home field advantage… Watch out. If not? I doubt they’ll make the NFC championship game.

[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
Fucking Seatlle man. Rams dominated them and should have won that game. With Bradford in the game I think they would have won for sure. Makes me think when Seattle goes to San Fran that the Niners will hand it to them. They look very ordinary on the road.[/quote]

I agree, had Bradford been playing they would have one. Actually, if they ran it in to the outside or did a screen on the last play they probably would have won anyway.
But let’s credit that Rams defense. They put on a show last night on one of the best offenses in football. That was impressive.

[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
With the 3 losses in the NFC Least, the Giants are actually back in the run in the division with their 2 wins. Damn thats sad.[/quote]

They’ve started really bad before and came back and won the SB. With them in that division, I wouldn’t count them out yet. Almost, but not yet.

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
Fucking Seatlle man. Rams dominated them and should have won that game. With Bradford in the game I think they would have won for sure. Makes me think when Seattle goes to San Fran that the Niners will hand it to them. They look very ordinary on the road.[/quote]
Seattle is not even close to the same team when they aren’t at home.

If they get home field advantage… Watch out. If not? I doubt they’ll make the NFC championship game.[/quote]

I just think they underestimated the Rams.

Quinn and Long had Wilson’s number all game. Too bad Kellen Clemens blows.

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
Fucking Seatlle man. Rams dominated them and should have won that game. With Bradford in the game I think they would have won for sure. Makes me think when Seattle goes to San Fran that the Niners will hand it to them. They look very ordinary on the road.[/quote]
Seattle is not even close to the same team when they aren’t at home.

If they get home field advantage… Watch out. If not? I doubt they’ll make the NFC championship game.[/quote]

Seattle has the biggest home field advantage in the league. Bar none. They also probably have the biggest away disadvantage in the league and they might be the worst road team ever relative to their talent/ability level. So the fact that they are winning on the road even if the wins are ugly and against average teams is a great sign, imo. I’d agree that without home field advantage they will have a tough time in the playoffs. With home field advantage they’ll be some scary motherfuckers.

[quote]jjackkrash wrote:

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
Fucking Seatlle man. Rams dominated them and should have won that game. With Bradford in the game I think they would have won for sure. Makes me think when Seattle goes to San Fran that the Niners will hand it to them. They look very ordinary on the road.[/quote]
Seattle is not even close to the same team when they aren’t at home.

If they get home field advantage… Watch out. If not? I doubt they’ll make the NFC championship game.[/quote]

Seattle has the biggest home field advantage in the league. Bar none. They also probably have the biggest away disadvantage in the league and they might be the worst road team ever relative to their talent/ability level. So the fact that they are winning on the road even if the wins are ugly and against average teams is a great sign, imo. I’d agree that without home field advantage they will have a tough time in the playoffs. With home field advantage they’ll be some scary motherfuckers. [/quote]

Biggest road disadvantage? Is that because of the lack of their home field advantage?

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
Fucking Seatlle man. Rams dominated them and should have won that game. With Bradford in the game I think they would have won for sure. Makes me think when Seattle goes to San Fran that the Niners will hand it to them. They look very ordinary on the road.[/quote]
Seattle is not even close to the same team when they aren’t at home.

If they get home field advantage… Watch out. If not? I doubt they’ll make the NFC championship game.[/quote]

Lets not forget that the Rams can step up when playing in that division. The 9ers did not beat them last year. In the series with the Seahawks and the 49ers last year the combined score was 72-70 Rams with 2 wins at home, a tie and a loss on the road by 6 to the Hawks. The Rams just know how to play these two teams.

Interestingly, if they only went off of record against division opponents the Rams would have won that division last year at 4-1-1, the 49ers were 3-2-1, the Seahawks were 3-3, and the Cardinals were 1-5

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]jjackkrash wrote:

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
Fucking Seatlle man. Rams dominated them and should have won that game. With Bradford in the game I think they would have won for sure. Makes me think when Seattle goes to San Fran that the Niners will hand it to them. They look very ordinary on the road.[/quote]
Seattle is not even close to the same team when they aren’t at home.

If they get home field advantage… Watch out. If not? I doubt they’ll make the NFC championship game.[/quote]

Seattle has the biggest home field advantage in the league. Bar none. They also probably have the biggest away disadvantage in the league and they might be the worst road team ever relative to their talent/ability level. So the fact that they are winning on the road even if the wins are ugly and against average teams is a great sign, imo. I’d agree that without home field advantage they will have a tough time in the playoffs. With home field advantage they’ll be some scary motherfuckers. [/quote]

Biggest road disadvantage? Is that because of the lack of their home field advantage?
[/quote]

I don’t mean in an unfair way, just that they for some reason really suck on the road relative to expectations in the same way they enjoy a big advantage at home.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/nfl/news/20131025/nfl-meeting-oneida-indians-washington-redskins-name.ap/

I know there are a number of NFL fans who dont want the “Redskins” name removed but I can see how it can be viewed as a derogratory name. If native Americans had an civil organization like the NAACP, this wouldnt even be an arguement. What are yalls thoughts on the name? Should the Redskins name be removed?