[quote]print wrote:
What are your thoughts on the deviant Bill Belicheat hiring McDaniels at this time? Leave no stone unturned I guess.[/quote]
If you are not cheating you are not trying.
I thought somebody hired Bill’s OC as a college coach, so why not bring back the tard McDaniels.
Raiders made the move fired Jackson, sad to say they may be back into the miss now that they have a GM etc sooner than some other team with a crazy asses owner. 
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]print wrote:
What are your thoughts on the deviant Bill Belicheat hiring McDaniels at this time? Leave no stone unturned I guess.[/quote]
If you are not cheating you are not trying.
I thought somebody hired Bill’s OC as a college coach, so why not bring back the tard McDaniels.[/quote]
I was under the impression that McDani- aw fuck it, the tard was in Bills bad books for leaving in the first place and that bridge was burned. He can go back to washing and ironing Bradys jock strap I guess.
[quote]fnf wrote:
Am I drinking too much kool-aid? I want my team to win, there’s nothing wrong with that. New Orleans is not unbeatable. Their defense gives up 5 yds a rush. The 49ers are very good at running.
In New Orleans, NO ONE can beat them. Away from home, they’ve lost 3 times. So they can be beat.
My teams weakness is stopping the pass, so I can see Brees getting 350 easily. But let’s say my team goes up 7-0 eating up 8 minutes of the clock. Then Brees throws a pick and the 49ers eat 7 minutes of the clock and get a FG. That’s 10-0 and half way into the 2nd quarter. It could happen just like NO easily burning Brown for a TD and Goldson missing a tackle for another TD so NO is up 14-0.
Should be a good game. Aldon and Justin Smith will do work, so Brooks has to show up.[/quote]
True. Nothing wrong with you wanting your team to win and certainly overdosed on kool-aid, as well.
[quote]chillain wrote:
[quote]fnf wrote:
Am I drinking too much kool-aid? I want my team to win, there’s nothing wrong with that. New Orleans is not unbeatable. Their defense gives up 5 yds a rush. The 49ers are very good at running.
In New Orleans, NO ONE can beat them. Away from home, they’ve lost 3 times. So they can be beat.
My teams weakness is stopping the pass, so I can see Brees getting 350 easily. But let’s say my team goes up 7-0 eating up 8 minutes of the clock. Then Brees throws a pick and the 49ers eat 7 minutes of the clock and get a FG. That’s 10-0 and half way into the 2nd quarter. It could happen just like NO easily burning Brown for a TD and Goldson missing a tackle for another TD so NO is up 14-0.
Should be a good game. Aldon and Justin Smith will do work, so Brooks has to show up.[/quote]
True. Nothing wrong with you wanting your team to win and certainly overdosed on kool-aid, as well.
:)[/quote]
Haha We’ll see after the game. I’m hoping my team wins, not necessarily betting that my team wins.
The one true hope that myself and maybe other 49er fans hold is that New Orleans offense is very different on the road. Even Tennessee gave them a hard time.
One key for the 49ers keeping Brees on the sideline: Alex Smith. Frank Gore will average 4-5 yds a rush, so if Alex can convert those 3rd and 2s and 3s they can be successful. If not, track meet for the Saints when they get the ball over and over again.
[quote]chillain wrote:
[quote]fnf wrote:
Am I drinking too much kool-aid? I want my team to win, there’s nothing wrong with that. New Orleans is not unbeatable. Their defense gives up 5 yds a rush. The 49ers are very good at running.
In New Orleans, NO ONE can beat them. Away from home, they’ve lost 3 times. So they can be beat.
My teams weakness is stopping the pass, so I can see Brees getting 350 easily. But let’s say my team goes up 7-0 eating up 8 minutes of the clock. Then Brees throws a pick and the 49ers eat 7 minutes of the clock and get a FG. That’s 10-0 and half way into the 2nd quarter. It could happen just like NO easily burning Brown for a TD and Goldson missing a tackle for another TD so NO is up 14-0.
Should be a good game. Aldon and Justin Smith will do work, so Brooks has to show up.[/quote]
True. Nothing wrong with you wanting your team to win and certainly overdosed on kool-aid, as well.
:)[/quote]
People keep getting all excited about the Saints’ offense, and justifiably so, but people seem to forget that the Niners will be playing on offense as well. The Saints are horrible against the run and the pass and they’re even worse at stopping teams within the red zone. The Niners have sucked cock inside the red zone for most of the year, but the last 2 or 3 games they’ve been MUCH better in it, something like 6 TDs in their last 8 trips. The reality is that as bad as the Niners have performed on offense, they still have very favorable matchups in certain areas and I wouldn’t be surprised at all to see the Niners score four or five touchdowns against the Saints. It wouldn’t surprise me if they get 6 points out of their defense either. On top of that, unless things do a complete 180, the Saints will consistently be getting buried inside the 10 due to Lee’s punting and the Niners’ superior punt coverage.
And as good as the Saints’ passing game is, the Niners have a WAY more physical defense than anything the Saints have seen all year. They’ve knocked out a bunch of players this year. They knocked out Cedric Benson, LeSean McCoy, LaGarrette Blount, Jahvid Best, Kevin Kolb and at least a half-dozen others that I can’t remember right now. It wouldn’t surprise me at all to see the Niners knock someone like Graham or Colston or Sproles right the fuck out of the game.
And Brees, when you watch him play well, has all the time in the world to throw. I don’t expect the Niners to sit back and play coverage. They’ve done a lot of that this year, and they still have been able to get consistent pressure on the QB. They knocked Tony Romo out temporarily, they roughed up Vick, Kolb, Stafford, that dipshit 3rd stringer in St. Louis. I expect them to get pressure on Brees on a regular basis. Shit, Aldon Smith had 14 sacks this year and he barely played the first couple games and even after that he really only plays on 2nd or 3rd and long. If the Niners are in their nickel package a lot, which I’m sure they will be, Smith will be on the field much more, and the guy is simply unblockable at times. With him and Justin Smith and Ray McDonald, the Niners have 3 elite-level linemen plus the best stable of linebackers in the league coming after him on blitzes.
And even though the Niners’ secondary is a weakness, it’s a bend, don’t break-type of secondary. They’ve come up with a LOT of interceptions this year and they have some big hitters in Dashon Goldson and Donte Whitner that will make life uncomfortable for Brees’ receivers, especially over the middle. In fact, Brees loves to work the middle of the field, and that’s one area that their secondary has not struggled in this year. They’ve primarily struggled against sideline passes like deep outs and wheel routes.
I think anyone who thinks it’s only a matter of by how much the Saints win by is the one drinking the Kool-Aid. The Saints are the flavor of the month, LAST month. Plus, I’ve got to think the Niners are going to be extra motivated, if that’s even possible at this time of year, because they’re the underdogs. The Niners have NEVER been an underdog at home in the postseason. I just pray that the groundskeepers have been watering the shit out of that field because there hasn’t been rain in the Bay Area in more than a month, maybe two, which is unheard of in Northern California this time of year. Every playoff game the Niners have played at home has been on a pretty muddy field.
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
I think anyone who thinks it’s only a matter of by how much the Saints win by is the one drinking the Kool-Aid. [/quote]
I don’t disagree. Traditionally, this divisional round is where those rested home squads do well. (and if you bet football for awhile, its easy to argue both sides)
That said, the books opened at Saints by 3.5 and they’re usually not the kool-aid guys and that number hasn’t moved yet…
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
The Niners have NEVER been an underdog at home in the postseason. [/quote]
Great post DB don’t get me wrong, but we can’t let this one slide neither…
(not remotely relevant given past/current QB situation in current golden-age-of-QB era)
-edited-
[quote]chillain wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
I think anyone who thinks it’s only a matter of by how much the Saints win by is the one drinking the Kool-Aid. [/quote]
I don’t disagree. Traditionally, this divisional round is where those rested home squads do well. (and if you bet football for awhile, its easy to argue both sides)
That said, the books opened at Saints by 3.5 and they’re usually not the kool-aid guys and that number hasn’t moved yet…
[/quote]
The books opened on Sunday night at Saints minus one. And the point spread is determined EXACTLY by the Kool-Aid drinkers. It’s simply a reflection of the way people are betting and most sports bettors have no fucking clue what they’re betting on. They’re degenerate gamblers too stupid to be good at any other game of chance, so they pick random shit out of a hat for the most part. I mean, how many of these so-called experts were predicting the Niners would even be in this position at the beginning of the year? Not many at all. The Vegas guys gave them horrible odds to earn a first-round bye and they didn’t slowly drop as more and more of these so-called experts bet on the Niners, because they weren’t betting on them.
The point spread has risen as a result of many, many of these people betting on the Saints, which means nothing. It’s at 4 right now. The whole point spread is entirely irrelevant, but I know Jim Harbaugh will use it and anything else he can to further the us vs. them mentality that the Niners have had all year. It’s the only reason it’s relevant in any game.
How many oddsmakers and gamblers were picking the Giants to win the Series last year? Not many. How many picked the Cardinals to win it this year? Even less. How many picked the Giants to beat the Patriots a few years ago? Not many. Shit, I remember when the Niners went into the 1988 Championship game at Chicago. They were double-digit underdogs, which is huge in a Championship Game. No one gave them a chance. Game-time temperature was 23-below. And the Niners rolled them 28-3. So it just goes to show that anyone who points to the point spread as anything but a sign that most people think you won’t win doesn’t know shit. It means nothing. It’s just the reflection of people who don’t know shit about the game.
[quote]bond james bond wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]print wrote:
What are your thoughts on the deviant Bill Belicheat hiring McDaniels at this time? Leave no stone unturned I guess.[/quote]
If you are not cheating you are not trying.
I thought somebody hired Bill’s OC as a college coach, so why not bring back the tard McDaniels.[/quote]
I was under the impression that McDani- aw fuck it, the tard was in Bills bad books for leaving in the first place and that bridge was burned. He can go back to washing and ironing Bradys jock strap I guess.[/quote]
Bill has had tons of OC’s and DC’s taken away over the years, the guy is a coach developer like his mentor Bill.
[quote]chillain wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
I think anyone who thinks it’s only a matter of by how much the Saints win by is the one drinking the Kool-Aid. [/quote]
I don’t disagree. Traditionally, this divisional round is where those rested home squads do well. (and if you bet football for awhile, its easy to argue both sides)
That said, the books opened at Saints by 3.5 and they’re usually not the kool-aid guys and that number hasn’t moved yet…
[/quote]
Honestly that seems like a trap number to me, and it makes me want to pick the Niners.
DB, the Saints’ defensive numbers are badly skewed because of the way their games unfold. They are an average defense. The Niners are certainly superior in this regard, probably to any team in the league (only Baltimore is close IMO). The Niners D passes the eye test, while the Steelers D (as a comparison), with all their great regular season numbers, do not. By that I mean the Niners D looks impressive to me, the Steelers D did not. The Niners D consistently makes big plays and determines the outcome of games.
That said, the Niners D has not faced an offense like the Saints all year. There is no way to account for all of the weapons they have (especially Graham and Sproles), and their OL does a great job protecting Brees. It will be a fun game to watch.
The main thing that’s going to keep this game close, and the one thing you didn’t mention, is turnovers. Niners are number one in TO differential at +28 and the Saints are a below average -3. If the Niners win, that will be the difference.
Before actually analyzing this game a little more I thought it would be a Saints win, no problem. But the turnover numbers scare me, and I think it’s a toss up now. I’ll still take the Saints, if for no other reason than I want see a NO/NE Super Bowl.
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]bond james bond wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]print wrote:
What are your thoughts on the deviant Bill Belicheat hiring McDaniels at this time? Leave no stone unturned I guess.[/quote]
If you are not cheating you are not trying.
I thought somebody hired Bill’s OC as a college coach, so why not bring back the tard McDaniels.[/quote]
I was under the impression that McDani- aw fuck it, the tard was in Bills bad books for leaving in the first place and that bridge was burned. He can go back to washing and ironing Bradys jock strap I guess.[/quote]
Bill has had tons of OC’s and DC’s taken away over the years, the guy is a coach developer like his mentor Bill. [/quote]
Well I know all in Denver are hoping that hoodie Jr has the same cancerous effect on the Pats as he has everywhere else he has landed since leaving them.
[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
[quote]chillain wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
I think anyone who thinks it’s only a matter of by how much the Saints win by is the one drinking the Kool-Aid. [/quote]
I don’t disagree. Traditionally, this divisional round is where those rested home squads do well. (and if you bet football for awhile, its easy to argue both sides)
That said, the books opened at Saints by 3.5 and they’re usually not the kool-aid guys and that number hasn’t moved yet…
[/quote]
Honestly that seems like a trap number to me, and it makes me want to pick the Niners.
DB, the Saints’ defensive numbers are badly skewed because of the way their games unfold. They are an average defense. The Niners are certainly superior in this regard, probably to any team in the league (only Baltimore is close IMO). The Niners D passes the eye test, while the Steelers D (as a comparison), with all their great regular season numbers, do not. By that I mean the Niners D looks impressive to me, the Steelers D did not. The Niners D consistently makes big plays and determines the outcome of games.
That said, the Niners D has not faced an offense like the Saints all year. There is no way to account for all of the weapons they have (especially Graham and Sproles), and their OL does a great job protecting Brees. It will be a fun game to watch.
The main thing that’s going to keep this game close, and the one thing you didn’t mention, is turnovers. Niners are number one in TO differential at +28 and the Saints are a below average -3. If the Niners win, that will be the difference.
Before actually analyzing this game a little more I thought it would be a Saints win, no problem. But the turnover numbers scare me, and I think it’s a toss up now. I’ll still take the Saints, if for no other reason than I want see a NO/NE Super Bowl.[/quote]
You’re right, they haven’t faced an offense like the Saints’. But they have shut down some very good offenses. They shut down the Lions, IN Detroit and at a time when they were playing just like the Saints are now, they shut down Philly, IN Philly, and they shut down the Giants.
I did mention turnovers. I mentioned that I expected the Niners’ defense to score a touchdown, which can only happen on a turnover. I also mentioned that the Niners’ secondary has a lot of interceptions.
I think what’s going to happen is that the groundskeepers water the shit out of the field and the wind picks up and the crowd has a median blood-alcohol level of about .21 and goes bat-shit crazy for the whole game. The Saints will be unnerved by the conditions/crowd noise (Candlestick gets as loud as any outdoor stadium in the league outside of KC and Seattle), the Niners will sack Brees early and force a fumble. The fumble will be returned for a touchdown, the Saints will go three and out their second possession, the Niners march down the field and eat up about ten minutes of time before scoring a touchdown…and the route will be on.
Fuck what I said earlier in this thread; the Niners are going to win and the score may end up close when all is said and done, but the game won’t be as close as the score and the Niners will establish themselves throughout the game as the mentally and physically tougher team in every aspect of the game. Drew Brees is gonna get fucking dragged by his ankles out of the 'Stick. I’ll put up an avatar of anyone’s choice through the Super Bowl that says the Niners beat the Saints. I don’t give a fuck what it is.
Anyone? Avatar bet on the Niners’ game?
[quote]lanchefan1 wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]bond james bond wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]print wrote:
What are your thoughts on the deviant Bill Belicheat hiring McDaniels at this time? Leave no stone unturned I guess.[/quote]
If you are not cheating you are not trying.
I thought somebody hired Bill’s OC as a college coach, so why not bring back the tard McDaniels.[/quote]
I was under the impression that McDani- aw fuck it, the tard was in Bills bad books for leaving in the first place and that bridge was burned. He can go back to washing and ironing Bradys jock strap I guess.[/quote]
Bill has had tons of OC’s and DC’s taken away over the years, the guy is a coach developer like his mentor Bill. [/quote]
Well I know all in Denver are hoping that hoodie Jr has the same cancerous effect on the Pats as he has everywhere else he has landed since leaving them. :)[/quote]
Yea the Tard is not making Bill look good for sure, but Bill now brings him back, slaps him around a little bit and takes him to the woodshed.
He is an idiot savant when it comes to running an Offense, he just needs more seasoning.
[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
[quote]chillain wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
I think anyone who thinks it’s only a matter of by how much the Saints win by is the one drinking the Kool-Aid. [/quote]
I don’t disagree. Traditionally, this divisional round is where those rested home squads do well. (and if you bet football for awhile, its easy to argue both sides)
That said, the books opened at Saints by 3.5 and they’re usually not the kool-aid guys and that number hasn’t moved yet…
[/quote]
That said, the Niners D has not faced an offense like the Saints all year. There is no way to account for all of the weapons they have (especially Graham and Sproles), and their OL does a great job protecting Brees. It will be a fun game to watch.
[/quote]
The closest offense to N.Os the 49ers have faced is NYG and they aren’t even close to being what N.O is now and NYG I believe was missing Bradshaw. That was a close game all the way to the end.
But which defense has N.O faced that are as good as the 49ers? On the Saints first few drives, we’ll see if the SF pass rush can get to Brees. If not, I feel sorry for my DBs.
I’d like to know from people that have watched GB and N.O consistently who’s O is more dangerous. From the small sample I’ve seen, I give it to N.O because they can run more consistently.
[quote]fnf wrote:
[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
[quote]chillain wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
I think anyone who thinks it’s only a matter of by how much the Saints win by is the one drinking the Kool-Aid. [/quote]
I don’t disagree. Traditionally, this divisional round is where those rested home squads do well. (and if you bet football for awhile, its easy to argue both sides)
That said, the books opened at Saints by 3.5 and they’re usually not the kool-aid guys and that number hasn’t moved yet…
[/quote]
That said, the Niners D has not faced an offense like the Saints all year. There is no way to account for all of the weapons they have (especially Graham and Sproles), and their OL does a great job protecting Brees. It will be a fun game to watch.
[/quote]
The closest offense to N.Os the 49ers have faced is NYG and they aren’t even close to being what N.O is now and NYG I believe was missing Bradshaw. That was a close game all the way to the end.
But which defense has N.O faced that are as good as the 49ers? On the Saints first few drives, we’ll see if the SF pass rush can get to Brees. If not, I feel sorry for my DBs.
I’d like to know from people that have watched GB and N.O consistently who’s O is more dangerous. From the small sample I’ve seen, I give it to N.O because they can run more consistently. [/quote]
Well who did 49rs lose to early in the year? You guys do realize that Peyton and Garrett were both under Parcells at Dallas right, they run the same system.
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]lanchefan1 wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]bond james bond wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]print wrote:
What are your thoughts on the deviant Bill Belicheat hiring McDaniels at this time? Leave no stone unturned I guess.[/quote]
If you are not cheating you are not trying.
I thought somebody hired Bill’s OC as a college coach, so why not bring back the tard McDaniels.[/quote]
I was under the impression that McDani- aw fuck it, the tard was in Bills bad books for leaving in the first place and that bridge was burned. He can go back to washing and ironing Bradys jock strap I guess.[/quote]
Bill has had tons of OC’s and DC’s taken away over the years, the guy is a coach developer like his mentor Bill. [/quote]
Well I know all in Denver are hoping that hoodie Jr has the same cancerous effect on the Pats as he has everywhere else he has landed since leaving them. :)[/quote]
Yea the Tard is not making Bill look good for sure, but Bill now brings him back, slaps him around a little bit and takes him to the woodshed.
He is an idiot savant when it comes to running an Offense, he just needs more seasoning. [/quote]
After seeing him here first hand, I can say you have the idiot part spot on!
[quote]lanchefan1 wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]lanchefan1 wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]bond james bond wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]print wrote:
What are your thoughts on the deviant Bill Belicheat hiring McDaniels at this time? Leave no stone unturned I guess.[/quote]
If you are not cheating you are not trying.
I thought somebody hired Bill’s OC as a college coach, so why not bring back the tard McDaniels.[/quote]
I was under the impression that McDani- aw fuck it, the tard was in Bills bad books for leaving in the first place and that bridge was burned. He can go back to washing and ironing Bradys jock strap I guess.[/quote]
Bill has had tons of OC’s and DC’s taken away over the years, the guy is a coach developer like his mentor Bill. [/quote]
Well I know all in Denver are hoping that hoodie Jr has the same cancerous effect on the Pats as he has everywhere else he has landed since leaving them. :)[/quote]
Yea the Tard is not making Bill look good for sure, but Bill now brings him back, slaps him around a little bit and takes him to the woodshed.
He is an idiot savant when it comes to running an Offense, he just needs more seasoning. [/quote]
After seeing him here first hand, I can say you have the idiot part spot on![/quote]
Yea he gutted that team for sure, BUT how did Fox turn that Defense around so quick?
Somebody was doing something right.
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]fnf wrote:
[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
[quote]chillain wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
I think anyone who thinks it’s only a matter of by how much the Saints win by is the one drinking the Kool-Aid. [/quote]
I don’t disagree. Traditionally, this divisional round is where those rested home squads do well. (and if you bet football for awhile, its easy to argue both sides)
That said, the books opened at Saints by 3.5 and they’re usually not the kool-aid guys and that number hasn’t moved yet…
[/quote]
That said, the Niners D has not faced an offense like the Saints all year. There is no way to account for all of the weapons they have (especially Graham and Sproles), and their OL does a great job protecting Brees. It will be a fun game to watch.
[/quote]
The closest offense to N.Os the 49ers have faced is NYG and they aren’t even close to being what N.O is now and NYG I believe was missing Bradshaw. That was a close game all the way to the end.
But which defense has N.O faced that are as good as the 49ers? On the Saints first few drives, we’ll see if the SF pass rush can get to Brees. If not, I feel sorry for my DBs.
I’d like to know from people that have watched GB and N.O consistently who’s O is more dangerous. From the small sample I’ve seen, I give it to N.O because they can run more consistently. [/quote]
Well who did 49rs lose to early in the year? You guys do realize that Peyton and Garrett were both under Parcells at Dallas right, they run the same system.
[/quote]
That game meant nothing in terms of what’s going to happen this Saturday. The Niners are NOT the same team that lost that game. The Niners that are in the playoffs started their season at halftime of the Philly game. Down 20-3 or something like that at halftime and they came back and won. I think the score was 24-23.
So how ‘bout it big guy? Avatar wager on the game. If I lose, you can choose ANY avatar you want for me and I’ll sport that fucking abomination until the Super Bowl. If the Niners win, I choose YOUR avatar for the next few weeks. Ask Rajraj, I have good taste in others’ avatars.
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]fnf wrote:
[quote]Steel Nation wrote:
[quote]chillain wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
I think anyone who thinks it’s only a matter of by how much the Saints win by is the one drinking the Kool-Aid. [/quote]
I don’t disagree. Traditionally, this divisional round is where those rested home squads do well. (and if you bet football for awhile, its easy to argue both sides)
That said, the books opened at Saints by 3.5 and they’re usually not the kool-aid guys and that number hasn’t moved yet…
[/quote]
That said, the Niners D has not faced an offense like the Saints all year. There is no way to account for all of the weapons they have (especially Graham and Sproles), and their OL does a great job protecting Brees. It will be a fun game to watch.
[/quote]
The closest offense to N.Os the 49ers have faced is NYG and they aren’t even close to being what N.O is now and NYG I believe was missing Bradshaw. That was a close game all the way to the end.
But which defense has N.O faced that are as good as the 49ers? On the Saints first few drives, we’ll see if the SF pass rush can get to Brees. If not, I feel sorry for my DBs.
I’d like to know from people that have watched GB and N.O consistently who’s O is more dangerous. From the small sample I’ve seen, I give it to N.O because they can run more consistently. [/quote]
Well who did 49rs lose to early in the year? You guys do realize that Peyton and Garrett were both under Parcells at Dallas right, they run the same system.
[/quote]
That game meant nothing in terms of what’s going to happen this Saturday. The Niners are NOT the same team that lost that game. The Niners that are in the playoffs started their season at halftime of the Philly game. Down 20-3 or something like that at halftime and they came back and won. I think the score was 24-23.
So how ‘bout it big guy? Avatar wager on the game. If I lose, you can choose ANY avatar you want for me and I’ll sport that fucking abomination until the Super Bowl. If the Niners win, I choose YOUR avatar for the next few weeks. Ask Rajraj, I have good taste in others’ avatars.[/quote]
Lol you forget last year when I supported this avi for a month.
I am just busting balls about the 49rs DB, give me some thing for this year for Christs sake, Im dying here.
I in no way want the Saints to win and have actually picked the 49rs due to Saints playing poorly on the road.
My company is based out of Baton Rouge, so my boss loves to call me and give me shit about the Saints.
