New Movie Trailers and Spoilers

^ahhh, Ok I seen it…I mean him. But no other action shots. hmmmmmmm, Hope they don’t kill off the Gun man before the movie starts.

Is it just me or did this seem like a whole lot of 80’s one liners or catch phrases. More action less mugging for the camera.

Ehh, Double Post…I’ll add this

[quote]four60 wrote:
Ehh, Double Post…I’ll add this

No SHEILD for SOny, I had read that Sony wanted SHEILD but had to go with something else. I guess Peter’s parents won’t be SHEILD agents like in the comics.

[quote]kevinm1 wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:
Ehh, Double Post…I’ll add this

No SHEILD for SOny, I had read that Sony wanted SHEILD but had to go with something else. I guess Peter’s parents won’t be SHEILD agents like in the comics. [/quote]

After seeing the Avengers Movie it’s a lost. Shield was a silent star in that movie and Spidey would have been a great add.

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]kevinm1 wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:
Ehh, Double Post…I’ll add this

No SHEILD for SOny, I had read that Sony wanted SHEILD but had to go with something else. I guess Peter’s parents won’t be SHEILD agents like in the comics. [/quote]

After seeing the Avengers Movie it’s a lost. Shield was a silent star in that movie and Spidey would have been a great add.[/quote]

Kevin Feigue made some comments about who can use what and how, for instance Admantium is Sony(hence why Cap’s shield is vibranium and not a hybrid of both metals) SHEILD is Marvel owned but what was funny is Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch are public ground so they can be in either an X film or an Avengers film which could make for an interresting film if they decide to use cap’s cooky quartet(Hawkeye, Quicksilver, and Scarlet Witch)

[quote]Diddy Ryder wrote:

More zombies.[/quote]

Why do I get '‘Walking dead’ vibes from this trailer?

I Just hope the movie won’t be 90% character development + characters chilling in some abandoned house, waiting for the contagion/disease to end, and 10% zombies attacks.

[quote]four60 wrote:
Ehh, Double Post…I’ll add this

Trailer looks good. But…

I’ve seen the avengers… probably won’t be interested in this.

I’ll wait for the Dark Knight though.

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:

[quote]Diddy Ryder wrote:

More zombies.[/quote]

Why do I get '‘Walking dead’ vibes from this trailer?

I Just hope the movie won’t be 90% character development + characters chilling in some abandoned house, waiting for the contagion/disease to end, and 10% zombies attacks.

[/quote]

The zombies definitely look similar, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. I get the feeling that that was one of those trailers that shows a condensed version of the entire film though, and there was a fair bit of zombie slaying going on.

There’s a review here, scroll down the page to find it.

Enough of the yacky-yack Josh Brolin is in a Gangster Movie enough said:

Carrie remake supposed to come out next year.

Directed by Kimberly Pierce (directed Boys Don’t Cry)

Starring Chloe Moretz as Carrie and possibly Julianne Moore as the mother.

It’s supposed to be more like a reboot from the book, rather a “remake” of the original. The story’s set in the modern day and it might also include some “found footage” (think Blair Witch-y POV shaky-cam stuff), which makes sense considering the bullying and the end scene.

I’m actually looking forward to it.

[quote]four60 wrote:
Enough of the yacky-yack Josh Brolin is in a Gangster Movie enough said[/quote]
Looks pretty cool. Glad to see Nick Nolte getting back into things. He was solid in Warrior, too.

This almost has the feel of The Untouchables done with a more action-y twist.

Random Note: Speaking of Nolte and cop movies set in the '50s, Mulholland Falls is a great and under-rated suspense/thriller from a few years ago.

[quote]Chris Colucci wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:
Enough of the yacky-yack Josh Brolin is in a Gangster Movie enough said[/quote]
Looks pretty cool. Glad to see Nick Nolte getting back into things. He was solid in Warrior, too.

This almost has the feel of The Untouchables done with a more action-y twist.

Random Note: Speaking of Nolte and cop movies set in the '50s, Mulholland Falls is a great and under-rated suspense/thriller from a few years ago.[/quote]

It was a good. I enjoy that “fake” or “Movie” version of the 20’s, 30’s Like The Untouchables I even enjoyed the Road to Perdition. The gangasters are like mythological Monsters and the heroes are right out of Greek Mythology and Victory always comes with death on both sides.

Plus that Josh Brolin Punch was kick ass.

New Bond

[quote]roon12 wrote:
New Bond

[/quote]

Looks good. I’m a big fan of Craig as 007, he brings great suave coolness, badass presence and a hint of rage with him.

Probably my favourite Bond to be honest. I think the others tried too hard to make Bond suave and cool and ended up forgetting that Bond should be a guy you do not want to piss off. Not because he might do some super cool trick that leaves you dead before you realise you’ve even annoyed him, but because Craig’s Bond is a guy that would beat you bloody with his bare fists if you got in his way.

Looking forward to it.

The Master Official Teaser Trailer #1 - Paul Thomas Anderson Movie (2012) HD - YouTube Looks like it could be very cool. Trailer certainly does it’s job getting me interested.

[quote]Jereth127 wrote:

[quote]roon12 wrote:
New Bond

[/quote]

Looks good. I’m a big fan of Craig as 007, he brings great suave coolness, badass presence and a hint of rage with him.

Probably my favourite Bond to be honest. I think the others tried too hard to make Bond suave and cool and ended up forgetting that Bond should be a guy you do not want to piss off. Not because he might do some super cool trick that leaves you dead before you realise you’ve even annoyed him, but because Craig’s Bond is a guy that would beat you bloody with his bare fists if you got in his way.

Looking forward to it.[/quote]

Agreed, I think Craig might be the best bond yet. I’m excited about the movie, trailer looks awesome!

Another great thing about the Daniel Craig Bond movies is none of the titles are stupid plays on “Die” or Live" and such like that.
I also don’t want any more with “Gold” in the title.

[quote]Jereth127 wrote:

[quote]roon12 wrote:
New Bond

[/quote]

Looks good. I’m a big fan of Craig as 007, he brings great suave coolness, badass presence and a hint of rage with him.

Probably my favourite Bond to be honest. I think the others tried too hard to make Bond suave and cool and ended up forgetting that Bond should be a guy you do not want to piss off. Not because he might do some super cool trick that leaves you dead before you realise you’ve even annoyed him, but because Craig’s Bond is a guy that would beat you bloody with his bare fists if you got in his way.

Looking forward to it.[/quote]

Connery started that way also, was less on the suave stuff and more on straight out kick your ass. I also like Craig he pulls of the stone face crazy fucker pretty well.

[quote]roon12 wrote:
New Bond

Oh lala… exciting…

I can’t wait to know what the new opening theme is and who sings it;

The new car;

The new gadgets and guns;

And how many women 007 gets to fuck in this one…

The plot, as usual, is insignificant to me.

^^ Then you may be happier with one of those Pierce Brosnan Bond films.

Daniel Craig ones have very few, if any gadgets…unless you consider a pistol or punching a guy in the face aa gadget.