Wrong again. The finance industry is holding me accountable for having a disease that does not allow me to work. They are lumping me in with irresponsible spendthrifts and junkies. It ought to be against the law. And if they can’t make money from a few people who are disabled they need to get the hell out of that business because they don’t know what the fuck they are doing.
Are you saying that tax cuts don’t trickle-down to the public and aren’t good for the population?
Apparently you can’t read and comprehend, but you accuse me of that and other things. When you are the one guilty of what you accuse others of. Next time I will try and post a red bouncing ball above the words so you can follow along. Seeing the word hamster was enough for you. While comprehending the context was too difficult.
Again, re-read the Abstract and tell me where it says the referenced study was done on hamster.
Ironically, you hate the mortgage industry for loaning to people with statiscally no chance of paying it back.
You then hate the finance industry for not giving you money you have no chance of paying back.
So are you in favor of loosening lending practices back up to their old predatory ways?
You should start a co op that will lend to disabled people who can’t pay the loan back
WAHAHAHAHA
Wrong. The financial industry isn’t a charity. If you had the means to pay a loan back they would loan you money, but you don’t and you obviously don’t have any savings to pay for it. Therefore, it is your financial situation not the industry that’s holding you back.
No, they’re lumping you in with people that can’t payback a loan, which you can’t.
It should be against the law to deny a loan based on one’s ability to pay back said loan? That’s batshit stupid.
It has nothing to do with your disease. It has everything to do with your ability to re-pay a loan.
As @Basement_Gainz points out, “triple down economics” isn’t an economic model and few people “worship” the concept. I don’t find it a particularly persuasive method of increasing jobs or wages in reality.
Did the hamster’s tell you that?
Ahahahaha, you’re gonna double-down on this. Fucking really?
Thank you for proving my point you chuckle fuck.
It says it in the ACTUAL RESEARCH.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
No the study in question was done based on a hamster-model. Big difference. It says so right in the abstract. Surprised your graduate degree didn’t teach you this.
Wrong again. This study was done on humans based on a hamster model.
This is the guy that knows best! LOLOLOLOLOLOOL
I think most people agree on this. The question is: What is the best way to get there? I don’t think tax cuts fits the answer.
Demand. Substantially drummed up through advertising by apple.
Huge shocker for someone that doesn’t pay taxes.
That is simply not correct. It was not a hamster heart failure model done in humans. The study was done in hamsters. It is not our fault that you do not understand science terminology.
@dt79 showed the passage of the Methods section in post 1914 of this thread.
@Chris_Colucci posted the screenshot for you in post 1928.
@anon50325502 just showed you for a third time the section of the Methods that explains exactly where they got the hamsters and what was done to the hamsters during the study.
The study was done in hamsters. I don’t know how to explain this any more clearly to you. If you cannot accept basic facts when they are pointed out to you and need to repeatedly accuse the other side of not being able to interpret the studies correctly, it may be best if you just stop altogether.
Lol, I don’t even know what to say…
Try and learn something today. If you’d like, I can train a hamster to teach this to you.
Brah, READ THE ABSTRACT!!!
That whole exchange is fucking eating at my soul man
It’s hard not to respond.
So… consumers demanded iPhones before apple invented them? Even before consumers knew that such a thing could exist.
Are consumers clairvoyant? Was it just psychics who wanted iPhones before they existed?
@Zeppelin795 company’s name is Yardi Matrix. She calls apartment buildings all day and asks what the rents are and then codes them back. Makes $15-$17/hour.
It’s hard to believe that a government “by and for the people,” by Zep’s standards, has never been tried. Handing those with lesser productive and creative capacities and/or desires a right to the productive and creative capacities and/or desires of others seems like such a good idea…wait…that kind of sounds like what every government in history has become.
I love that this entire thread died once Zep was caught employing studies that he completely misunderstood. He just left once he realized you all were correct. The question is… how long will he wait for the fires to die before starting another?
Edit: Thank you to all those who provided such interesting and helpful information. I’m talking to you @Basement_Gainz, @anon50325502, @ActivitiesGuy, @dt79, and anyone else whom I missed.
