New Business Failures

[dt79]

@Zeppelin795

I don’t as you have already admitted bribing your government into doing what is financially best for you.

No, I bribe officials in China so my projects get approval because of useless regulations which should not exist in the first place. If I don’t, they don’t get approval. It is the same thing as me giving the doctor a bribe so he gives you the proper treatment. I am not denying anyone else the same treatment by doing so.

I do this in China, where rampant systemic corruption is beyond the comprehension of people who live in the US because of the remnants of SOCIALISM and BIG GOVERNMENT.

I do not bribe anyone in the country I live in because I don’t have to since there is a free market with limited government intervention. This is where my main business is conducted.

Zep, why do you want the US to end up the same way as China just because you want your free money?

@Zeppelin795

Another non-answer. I’m to assume that paying for wars in the same way is no problem?

You can assume I think the earth is flat just because I don’t talk about it too. It would still make you an idiot.

However, since you insist that I point out how stupid you are, let me explain.

No, I don’t think you should do this for either.

Printing money devalues the currency, which leads to inflation, which leads to the increase in the cost of stuff. The lowest rungs of society will bear the brunt of it while the well-off won’t since the former will see the increase in the price of daily necessities. The ones who will get fucked the most, however, will be the middle class. Oh boy, you really hate them, don’t you?

Since welfare and social spending in the US is several times that of the cost of defense, you will see an even more pronounced effect.

Which is why you are an idiot.

@Zeppelin795

Why do people who spend the most on elections tend to be victorious?

Because their ad campaigns have a wider reach, more repetition, more strategic ad placement and a higher budget for ad agencies which leads to better ad quality.

I’m quite familiar with advertising since it is part of what I do for a living. You’re in over your head with this one as usual.

@Zeppelin795

What?

Acting dumb again when you are called out on your hypocrisy? Trust me, you don’t need to act.

@Zeppelin795

No, like you’ve stated before you bribe politicians.

Quote me where I’ve said I’ve bribed politicians or apologise for being a hypocritical liar.

[Zeppelin795]

@anon50325502

Lol, you’re such a fool.

Yeah, you mention something hat is total foolish, but when I call you out on it I’m foolish.

[Zeppelin795]

@anon50325502

Oh cool, so she’s just another politician selling BS to gain power and influence. Awesome.

Not being an absolute expert on a subject is far different from blatantly lying to the public.

[Zeppelin795]

@anon50325502

Dude, you’re a clown. The point you think you’re making is a dumb one.

Of course I am. It is questioning your stupid reason.

[Zeppelin795]

@anon50325502

You’re joking, right?

Pretty fucking amazing with all of the benefits we provide to people in this country comparatively.

A question you don’t want to answer. Why? Do the benefits match the job salary lost or even come close to it?

[dt79]

@Zeppelin795

A question you don’t want to answer. Why? Do the benefits match the job salary lost or even come close to it?

Oh for fuck’s sake, just print more money.

[dt79]

@Zeppelin795

Not being an absolute expert on a subject is far different from blatantly lying to the public.

Giving the wrong facts leads to equally detrimental results regardless of intent. The goal should be to call out someone’s blatant lies so that people are educated instead of putting someone in his place who says dumb shit and defending her because you perceive her to be “honest”.

And please don’t misunderstand. I do not think she’s honest.

[Zeppelin795]

Here are the studies and no you never replied back to these.

Shabbit A. Zinn D, Suzuki G, Lee T. Heart failure therapy mediated by the trophic activities of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: a noninvasive therapeutic regimen. Am I Physiol Heart Cire Physiol. 2009;296(6);H1888-97, dol: 10.1152/ajpheart.00186.2009

Zhang S,Shpall E. Willerson JT, Yeh ET. Fusion of hematoopotetic progenitor cells and murine cardiomyocytes is mediated by alpha 4 beta 1 integrin/vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 interaction. Circ Res. 2007;100(5)693-702.

While these studies were conducted over several trials they added up to over 1,000 participants each.

Another one, just for the fun of it.

Wang J. Zhang S, Rabinovich B, et al. Human CD34+ cells in experimental myocardial infarction: long-tern survival, sustained functional improvement, and mechanism of action. Circ Res. 2010;106(12):1904-11.oi 10.1161/CIRCREAHA.110.221762.

[dt79]

@Zeppelin795

While these studies were conducted over several trials they added up to over 1,000 participants each.

Alas, I can say with sufficent certainty that 100 percent of the participants have, since, expired.

[anon50325502]

@Zeppelin795

@anon50325502

Lol, you’re such a fool.

Yeah, you mention something hat is total foolish, but when I call you out on it I’m foolish.

You’re even more of a clown than I thought (impressive) if you really aren’t aware that article titles are used to draw in viewers even though they are often misleading or completely false. However, more importantly, it’s that you misunderstand what the tile and ultimately the article means, repeatedly. Which is why almost always the “evidence” you post supports the opposite of what you think it does.

@Zeppelin795

Not being an absolute expert on a subject is far different from blatantly lying to the public.

She isn’t even an amateur on these subjects.

@anon50325502

Dude, you’re a clown.

@Zeppelin795

Of course I am.

Correct.

@Zeppelin795

It is questioning your stupid reason.

We didn’t print money to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan. We took on debt. Completely different, fool, and something I’m against in most cases.

Also, the ENTIRE cost (direct and indirect) of the most recent wars (Iraq and Afghanistan) would fund M4A for TWO years. Three at most. The two things are not comparable. It would be like comparing a $100 groceries bill I put on my credit card because I’m hungry and short on money this week to a $500,000 mortgage I took out because I think it’d be nice to live in this house for $3,000/month. They’re not comparable. It’s fucking stupid to compare them.

@Zeppelin795

A question you don’t want to answer.

You’re an idiot. I’ve already answered this question a dozen times.

1. People that lost their jobs to offshoring receive a fuckton of benefit until they find new employment.
2. There are TONS of jobs in the US. We’re the 2nd largest manufacturers in the WORLD not to mention all of the other jobs we have here.
3. Offshoring lowers prices, generally, for goods so everyone; including those that lost their original job, now pay less for goods. Do you have any fucking clue how expensive labor is in the US? Of course, you don’t.

[anon50325502]

All federally funded research in the United States of America. You’re an insufferable moron.

[dt79]

@anon50325502

However, more importantly, it’s that you misunderstand what the tile and ultimately the article means, repeatedly.

The 3 studies he posted above were done on mice and hamsters.

1,000 participants over several trials? Must have been the title or content of the article he read.

[anon50325502]

@dt79

@anon50325502

However, more importantly, it’s that you misunderstand what the tile and ultimately the article means, repeatedly.

The 3 studies he posted above were done on mice and hamsters.

1,000 participants over several trials? Must have been the title or content of the article he read.

Plus at least the first one is a decade old and that’s the kicker. I highly doubt he has access to whatever journal these were published in so, best case, he’s read the abstract. That’s like reading the back cover of a book and thinking you know what it’s about. He has no idea what the actual research says and he has no idea what new research has confirmed or countered a study done nine fucking years ago. Not to mention, he clearly doesn’t know how to interpret the research. Generally, I give people the benefit of the doubt if they display some level of intelligence, but I’m not convinced he can even read let alone comprehend what he’s reading. The whole debacle over the Nordic countries you’ve dismantled him on is a classic example.

So, once again, he’s read a title and thinks it supports his position (whatever that actually is). I don’t even know what the purpose of posting the studies is? To prove that he’s wrong about stem cell research in the US. Cool, thanks Zeppy.

[anon50325502]

Another one of these “brilliant” democratic socialists.

Nixon’s terrible ‘economic plan’ almost makes Cuomo look good

[polo77j]

I hear the theme music to Looney Tunes whenever I hear Nixon, Ocassio-Cortez, or Sanders speak

[anon50325502]

I could never vote for Nixon just based on how poor her relationships always were in Sex in the City…

[Zeppelin795]

@dt79

Alas, I can say with sufficent certainty that 100 percent of the participants have, since, expired.

Should I just believe you? Even if that was true, what would be their prognosis if stem cell therapy hadn’t been performed? And why are people still traveling outside of the country to have this treatment performed if the prognosis is so bad?

[dt79]

Read the studies.

[anon50325502]

@Zeppelin795

why are people still traveling outside of the country to have this treatment performed if the prognosis is so bad?

Desperation.

[Lock]

Normally I lurk, but I wanted to say this:

Zep, you frustrate the hell out of me, and there is no way you’re not a troll. No way.

As you were.