But there’s nothing to question.
Way back when, you originally posted the study and talked about it like it was done on humans. When it was pointed out by ActivitiesGuy (an expert on the topic) and by other people (who read the very-easy-to-find full text of the study) that it wasn’t done on humans, you refused to accept the fact and began all the excuses, wordplay, and dodging.
Most recent example of the dodging and wordplay: USMC said “You still think the study you posted was conducted on people and not hamsters.” … You replied “And you still try and connect this to the wrong studies.”
It has nothing to do with “the wrong studies”. It’s always been about the original which you refuse to accept.
The afternoon of August 12, you posted 3 studies. The morning of August 13, dt79 pointed out that they were done on mice and hamsters. The afternoon of August 13, you said “No they weren’t. They were done on humans, just like the PEOPLE who have the treatment done today.”
About an hour later, ActivitiesGuy went in-depth explaining how there’s not a shadow of doubt they were absolutely done on animals. That’s the exact moment where the “Sorry, I was wrong” should’ve come into play, but instead, it’s when you began the whole “hamster model doesn’t mean hamsters” nonsense.