New Business Failures

He is saying people do things out of self-interest. Self-interest does not mean only getting monetary returns for your actions. A familial and personal connection is what motivates him and the returns he receives is having a great bunch of people to be around. These things are the value he receives from parting with his time and/or money. If not for these, he may not be doing it.

The biggest mistake people make is thinking that altruism alone is what drives acts of charity.

In business, it is the same. You need to know the value the consumer gets out of purchasing your product or using your service. And remember, you are also competing with other charities because if someone gives his money to you, he is not giving it to another charity. Which is why you need to approach this like a business. If you simply think you can rely on the goodwill of people, of course you will fail.

My personal experience: Advertising campaigns for 1 charity and 2 non-profits for social causes. Budget for one project went into high 6 figures for a 3 month campaign.

Interesting fact: A very high profile US democrat championing a social cause with great moral indignation in the mid 2000s quoted me $200,000 excluding air fare and hotel expenses for a one night dinner and a 15 minute speech for the purpose of this cause.

The fact that members of the public are aware of this and politicians aren’t is incredibly difficult to believe.

You MAY still haven to file for BK, just because you got sick. A phenomenon in the U.S. ā€œhealthcareā€ system. Wow, how great!

A friend of a friend has MS and the government pays for his medication.5k a month. he told me for Copaxone. And his blind spot continues to grow.So you are still paying for it, only with stem cell treatment it is actually less expensive and gives the diseased the best chance of getting better and back to work. So they can get off of disability. I’d think you’d be down with that course of action?

[quote=ā€œpfury, post:1459, topic:242703ā€]
Brah, I’m both college educated in finance AND worked at a mortgage company as its sole data analyst for 2 years. Nobody gives 2 shits about your credit score as long as its above 600.
[/quote/]

So it DOES matter.

You have it backwards. Pols understand it just fine, it’s the public that’s ignorant.

As opposed to most of the planet where you would just die?

Also, if I can contract an incurable disease with so much expense and damage that I have to filed BK, I’ll be happy to be alive, not pissy that other people won’t let me spend their money.

I’m absolutely in favor of stem cells. I’m just not in favor of paying for it for you when the research is still so new

Matters that it exists? Sure. But your FICO score (if above 600ish) plays essentially no role in determining if you should be loaned money, especially on a non asset loan.

They look at proof of income and proof of assets, along with work history the most. Ya know, the ā€˜can this guy repay us’ metrics.

1 Like

So that makes it okay to bribe them?

Which makes you part of the problem.

You don’t have a socialist government. You have a totalitarian government masquerading as a socialist government. Big difference.

So why isn’t this a problem in Scandinavian countries?

So the middle east wars are justified?

Like the trillions spent on war? There is no questions about the severe deficit in regards to this spending which is FAR more than domestic spending. So the concern about the deficit is not real.

I am. Voting for those who reject corporate spending. Mostly progressives.

The propaganda fed to you is coming from a totalitarian government.

Real socialism means state ownership of the means of production, as has been explained to you many times. It isn’t just safety net programs that makes a country socialist.

In order for those assets to be collectively owned they must be seized. Seizing them requires a totalitarian regime.

Therefore every truly socialist government must also be a totalitarian one.

The scandanavians have a robust market economy with private ownership of the means of production coupled with high taxes and safety net programs. Very, very much like the US.

I know you won’t listen to me. Have a great day anyway.

4 Likes

Fucking capitalism.

4 Likes

No. Neither is it ok to receive bribes. But this is not about blame. This is about preventing bribery.

Life imprisonment and the death penalty isn’t a deterrent.

I repeat. LIFE IMPRISONMENT and the DEATH PENALTY isn’t a deterrent.

What this shows you is that there are so many layers upon layers of corruption within the system that government officials are so confident that they won’t get caught.

Which means the higher ranking officials don’t even need external sources of income through bribery since they can easily steal The People’s tax money.

Sure. Stop me.

Prevent this from happening in the first place. Give me no incentive to bribe them.

Because even if I don’t bribe them, the system is set in place where they can steal The People’s money.

I’m not from China. I do business in China.

Every socialist government in history has ended up in totalitarianism. It is inevitable. You cannot turn the country socialist without giving the government enough power to do that. When you give the government so much power, it will be abused. This power cannot be taken back once that happens until they have bled the country dry and there isn’t even enough money left to steal. Then the crony capitalism starts. This occurs over decades. There is no other reasonably foreseeable outcome.

Because people suck.

Because the government stays out of the economy therefore the country is still generating income. They are smart enough to know not to fuck with what is generating wealth for the country. Bernie doesn’t plan to do the same.

Depends on which one.

Why are you deflecting with this? This was never part of the discussion.

Oh I get it. Hi Bernie!

No, Bernie. More is spent on welfare.

Nice try, though.

While going along with their plans for Big Government? For the potential of even more corruption? Come on, man.

I’m not from China, if that’s what you’re inferring.

But this doesn’t even make sense. You are saying a totalitarian government is going to tell you it’s a totalitarian government? A totalitarian government with it’s roots in socialism is going to tell you socialism is bad? That’s like a snake oil salesman telling you he’s selling you snake oil. It’s not how propaganda works.

Propaganda works by giving you the idea that you aren’t going to be ruled by totalitarianism. They are your HEROES. They create VILLAINS and rile you up with righteous ā€œmoralā€ rage so you don’t see how they’re setting up the system to slowly take away your rights and put power in their hands.

They promise ā€œjusticeā€ and make you so pissed off at selected classes of people so that you willingly give them the power needed to eradicate them. They control the media because you gave them power to suppress media by people you disagreed with. They take away your right to lawful assembly and protest because you gave them the power to shut down public speeches by people you disagreed with. They take away your possessions because you gave them the right to nationalize and redistribute the possessions of people they made you believe were oppressing you. They will control language because you want to be protected from ā€œhate speechā€ in which laws when enacted will be subjective in application so they can basically justify anything to be an act of sedition. With this, they will control education and the intellectuals who will indoctrinate your next generation into loving the State that’s fucking them.

This is how propaganda works. By the time you figure it out, you are already fucked.

5 Likes

Your own source :

China socialist. Mao was a hero.

China was socialist. Mao was a hero.

100 million dead. Good job.

Blames Deng Xiaoping for fucking things up by bring capitalism into the country after people were eating TREE BARKS for survival and every government attempt at production and business failed miserably.

My relatives there who lived through the Cultural Revolution will laugh at this before punching whoever wrote these in the face.

2 Likes

Like everybody? I wasn’t offered a place to stay by my siblings even though I had the threat of homelessness looming. Is this what supposed Christians do? My brother-in-law actually had the audacity to assert that I was making it up. Like I walk around claiming to have MS in order to curry favors. What a piece of shit! The people I feel most sorry for are his children because they have no idea what phonies their parents are. Totally embarrassing!

Another corporate politician that we need to get rid of. A major problem with the system.

No. That is communism. Socialist countries have the means of production owned by the members of the population.

Nordic countries.

While their is higher taxation, more unionization and a more robust social policy(like single=payer) their economy still does great. How can that be? We are told the opposite occurs if tried.

Norway’s measurements.

In terms of the human development index (HDI) of Norway, which is the index used by the United Nations to measure the progress of a country, was 0.949 points in 2015, leaving it in 1th place in the table of 188 countries published.

Scandinavian countries have a higher rate of effective taxation than the U.S. along with a stronger safety net… Sick people aren’t held to the same standard as the healthy. How disgusting to let the sick just get away with it. An unfair system if there ever was one.

Physician heal thyself.

2 Likes

Jesus Christ. The fucking Prime Minister of Denmark says his own country is capitalist and he prefers to listen to a bum like Bernie.

2 Likes

Rubbish. Workers own the means of production in communism.

What you don’t understand is what ā€œThe Stateā€ means.

The State = The People

Government runs The State and makes decisions on behalf of it. They are supposed to reflect the Will of The People. If everything is State-owned, which means everyone owns the means of production, it also means the GOVERNMENT HAS THE POWER TO CONTROL EVERYTHING.

You own public parks. Try taking a shit right in the middle of it and see what The State does to you.

Here’s a better idea. Try breaking into a military base and see if you get shot. It’s your’s.

2 Likes

First, I wrote SOCIAL CAUSE.

Second, he’s a very big Bernie supporter.

Funny, they never talk about the recent developments. Like shipping jobs overseas looking for less expensive labor, all for the benefit for those at the top, at the expense of the population. What about the decoupling of productivity in wages from productivity in the 70’s? What about the stagnant or declining wages of the middle class?

Well, apparently, in the People’s Socialist Republic of San Francisco, they would do nothing … apparently the streets are paves with feces now a days

1 Like

Yes, my own source.

When, on Oct. 1, 1949, Communist leader Mao Zedong

Years of struggle had already shown that only the Communists,

So because the word socialism is used, then it means it was a socialist government?

No. Exactly the opposite. Just because the word communist is used doesn’t mean it was a communist government. The system they alluded to in the article is socialist. You need to learn how to read good.

Your own source.

This may help.

All with more taxation and a more robust social safety net. Right?