Maybe, there isn’t any long term spinal cord injury help. Does that mean that people who just had a spinal cord injury ought not to have the choice?
No. You say that my opinion is based on old info. I’m asking you to provide current info that pertains to the circumstance- long term spinal chord injury regeneration.
You can’t, because there isn’t any.
1 Like
So different than what happened with the massive bailouts of our private banks?
Why don’t you tell me? I wouldn’t want to misrepresent your position on the “systematic solution”.
And don’t do the usual silly “but corporations did worse shit” deflection. That would only work if I were against co-ops.
It is true, fuck off.
Nah, just because YOU don’t like it doesn’t mean it’s not valuable. You just can’t separate “what you agree with” from what constitutes evidence. Not our fault.
We’ve been through this. Your definition of evidence is whatever you happen to agree with at that moment in time, and your definition of brainwashed is whatever you happen to DISAGREE with at that moment.
That’s not evidence, nor proof. You go by Teh Feelzz exclusively.
1 Like
Case and point, being Anti-Vaccine because questions need to be thoroughly answered while simultaneously wanting mj and stem cell treatments without study. Because, da feelz.
1 Like
I thought you guys were joking. He’s really anti-vaccines?
1 Like
Ya…
Are you living under a rock? Are you not aware of the massive bailouts of our private banking system? Are you insinuating that bank failures happen far less in the private sector?
So once again, is that a reason to keep stem cell therapy from coming to the market? No. But what is to the healthcare cartel, is a negative effect on their bottom line. Better to prolong the suffering of the public so they can make more in profits.
So if this is just conjecture, why do people continue to have stem cell therapy? Because it works!
So again, the majority of people who have reported positive results are either lying or just making it up.
Yes you do. This is your baby. Capitalism.
Do you care why pharma was lobbying against medicinal cannabis? No because it’s just yesterdays spilled milk. So them trying to limit choice wasn’t a problem for you?
So the threat of potentially going to jail isn’t a concern?
Lolz, you’ve now skiped my three questions three times, but I’m supposed to do you the courtesy of answering you?
Fuck you.
Ctrl + C Ctrl + V
Banks were forced to take bailout money, dipshit.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/business/blog/2008/oct/15/banking
I told you there is no use comparing any misdeeds done by a co-op to those done by the banks as a deflection because I am not against co-ops, therefore I am not in favor of the existence of one over the other.
You have chosen to use another method of deflection by deliberately misrepresenting my post.
I also told you to explain how a co-op is a “systematic solution” given the co-op bank in the link I posted was not above partaking in a scam leading to it’s failure.
The following link is more in-depth:
http://www.icmrindia.org/casestudies/catalogue/Finance/Co-operative%20Bank%20Scams%20in%20India.htm
Have you been under the idea all along that co-ops are all part of the public sector?
Can you describe your understanding of the meaning of “private” and “public” sectors?
You believe because you work in some facet of the field you understand the business side of it. You clearly do not.
Plenty of studies and positive results on tens of thousands of people with stem cells. Even more with medicinal cannabis. Thank God the public didn’t have to wait around and suffer until your personal hard-on for clinical trials. Relief was granted to those suffering by the public. Not politicians and pharma.
When? The answer to your dumb question was probably already answered in a question I posted. But you didn’t get it.