Dead serious. I agree that corporate greed creates a ton of problems, I just disagree with you on the fix. I actually would like to shop at co ops assuming they can provide comparable value.
You say you financially support co ops, I’d be happy to join you
No because the healthcare system is not monolithic. The industry is a conglomerate of corporations. They feed off of each others control.
Then please explain why it has already done so? The legalization of cannabis has cut down the usage of opioids. Leading to less overdoses but less profits for pharma. Cry me a river.
More expensive as the drug costs in this country? Where the majority of these synthetic chemicals are taken monthly along with a laundry list of awful side effects.
You equate the money sports stars make with CEO’s who ship jobs overseas and help to destroy the lives of thousands of Americans. But this isn’t surprising as you equate all profits as the same.
My position is that you are a liar, hypocrite and an opportunist who flagrantly uses the suffering of others to prop up his own attempt at taking a moral position towards subjects you have no proper arguments to support.
I also know you would rather people continue to suffer as long as you can take the wealthy down.
And I have provided ample retorts and examples within this thread, which you have either deflected or lied your way around.
You want to play the moral game again? I’ll play it with you. Just don’t run away again and hope the posts will disappear just because you fail to acknowledge them.
So pharma seeks to limit choice of the public and that is not immoral and highly unethical? Especially when the cost is in human suffering and even death.
So why did pharma lobby against medicinal cannabis?
Why are you ascribing a position to me when I have never posted once about pharma?
You did this with co-ops where I never posted anything negative about them.
But your argument is about morality. If you cannot prove the things you assert are really happening, you cannot ask the moral question. But you’re jumping on the moral argument before proving the former. This would be dishonest, which would make you immoral.
I have purposefully refused to take a position on multiple topics because I knew you will be jumping around between, and falling back on one of them as a deflection everytime you have no answer for the one currently in contention, only to bring up the current one again in a later topic as if the previous exchange had never occured.
20+ years of seeing these pathetic tactics used by hypocritical, lying scum like you.
I don’t care what other people do. Unfortunately, desperation drives people do do all sorts of things, like patronize peddlers of false hope that are more than willing to promise the world and deliver ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in return.
Emphasis on ABSOLUTELY NOTHING because thats what you have.
Jesus tap dancing Christ … answer the fucking question you hack. It’s established profits are a motive. You admitted to other motives aside from profit. I asked you to identify them and you answer my questions with more questions that divert away from the conversation. Answer the fucking questions.