[quote]Bismark wrote:
5 Ways Nevada Rancher Militia Resembles Pakistan’s Taliban
http://www.juancole.com/2014/04/resembles-pakistans-taliban.html[/quote]
I would have no concern boarding a plane with any of these Nevada Militia.
Pakistani Taliban not so much.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
5 Ways Nevada Rancher Militia Resembles Pakistan’s Taliban
http://www.juancole.com/2014/04/resembles-pakistans-taliban.html[/quote]
I would have no concern boarding a plane with any of these Nevada Militia.
Pakistani Taliban not so much.[/quote]
I would. They’d likely complain about all of the government regulations keeping us from taking a vertical descent. An insurgent doesn’t necessarily equate with a terrorist.
[quote]ZJStrope wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I personally do not even think whether his son made a couple bucks or not is the issue . No one had a problem with Cheney outsourcing our entire military to Haliburton . I think it would be a great thing to change but why act as though the evil Democrats are the only guilty sitting at the trough
[/quote]
Quite a few people had a problem with Cheney outsourcing to Haliburton. I know it bugged me quite a bit.
I loved being in Iraq and seeing Haliburton guys make 3-5x as much as me doing my job and not having to worry about getting shot.[/quote]
Or having to worry about legal repercussions for killing civilians. Fuck primate military corporations.
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
5 Ways Nevada Rancher Militia Resembles Pakistan’s Taliban
http://www.juancole.com/2014/04/resembles-pakistans-taliban.html[/quote]
I would have no concern boarding a plane with any of these Nevada Militia.
Pakistani Taliban not so much.[/quote]
An insurgent doesn’t necessarily equate with a terrorist. [/quote]
And a patriot does not equate with a terrorist.
Those involved in the 911 attacks killed innocent people for their reasons.
The Bundy people did not kill innocent people for their reasons.
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
5 Ways Nevada Rancher Militia Resembles Pakistan’s Taliban
http://www.juancole.com/2014/04/resembles-pakistans-taliban.html[/quote]
I would have no concern boarding a plane with any of these Nevada Militia.
Pakistani Taliban not so much.[/quote]
I would. They’d likely complain about all of the government regulations keeping us from taking a vertical descent. An insurgent doesn’t necessarily equate with a terrorist. [/quote]
You have a skewed view of militia types then. I know more than quite a few and they don’t complain about common sense regulations regarding safety. And you would rather ride on an airplane full of Taliban than American citizens who happen to be in a militia?
I am sincerely hoping that is a jest.
Deeming patriotic citizens making use of their rights as domestic terrorists like Reid did though is unforgivable.
The link you posted was very interesting though and informative. I give you props for that.
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]ZJStrope wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I personally do not even think whether his son made a couple bucks or not is the issue . No one had a problem with Cheney outsourcing our entire military to Haliburton . I think it would be a great thing to change but why act as though the evil Democrats are the only guilty sitting at the trough
[/quote]
Quite a few people had a problem with Cheney outsourcing to Haliburton. I know it bugged me quite a bit.
I loved being in Iraq and seeing Haliburton guys make 3-5x as much as me doing my job and not having to worry about getting shot.[/quote]
Fuck primate military corporations. [/quote]
I know they are the worst. (Sorry I just couldn’t resist)
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
And a patriot does not equate with a terrorist.
Those involved in the 911 attacks killed innocent people for their reasons.
The Bundy people did not kill innocent people for their reasons.
[/quote]
Bundy and his supporters are definitely not patriots-rebels would be a more appropriate term. That’s a good thing, too-the Nazis were the ultimate patriots.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
No one had a problem with Cheney outsourcing our entire military to Haliburton . I think it would be a great thing to change but why act as though the evil Democrats are the only guilty sitting at the trough.[/quote]
I definitely had a big problem with that - not that it matters.
That’s actually a good example of why I don’t trust the militia. In this case I view the militia as just like the hired guns. What exactly are they being called in to do? Defend a farmer against what exactly? Action that’s being legally executed on? I saw the pictures of them on the bridge aiming at something. I was always trained that you don’t aim at something you don’t intend to shoot so are they aiming at the BLM? They are actually willing to kill BLM personnel over this? I’m very OK with a militia who is trained just like our military to defend our borders and the borders of the state in which they live. I’m not OK with them going out to fight someone that they don’t agree with.
james
I’m definitely not OK with the militia from one state going to another state to fight a battle that isn’t any of their business.
It is a problem that needs addressed , There are stories of Congressmen not only excepting bribes but extorting funds for campaign financing
[quote]atypical1 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
No one had a problem with Cheney outsourcing our entire military to Haliburton . I think it would be a great thing to change but why act as though the evil Democrats are the only guilty sitting at the trough.[/quote]
I definitely had a big problem with that - not that it matters.
That’s actually a good example of why I don’t trust the militia. In this case I view the militia as just like the hired guns. What exactly are they being called in to do? Defend a farmer against what exactly? Action that’s being legally executed on? I saw the pictures of them on the bridge aiming at something. I was always trained that you don’t aim at something you don’t intend to shoot so are they aiming at the BLM? They are actually willing to kill BLM personnel over this? I’m very OK with a militia who is trained just like our military to defend our borders and the borders of the state in which they live.
james
[/quote]
I completely agree. I would be ok with the militia doing this receiving a bullet in the head as a result of their actions.
Bundy did not pay his rent and now he has got all the whack jobs together to spread misinformation
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]mbdix wrote:
[quote]atypical1 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
No one had a problem with Cheney outsourcing our entire military to Haliburton . I think it would be a great thing to change but why act as though the evil Democrats are the only guilty sitting at the trough.[/quote]
I definitely had a big problem with that - not that it matters.
That’s actually a good example of why I don’t trust the militia. In this case I view the militia as just like the hired guns. What exactly are they being called in to do? Defend a farmer against what exactly? Action that’s being legally executed on? I saw the pictures of them on the bridge aiming at something. I was always trained that you don’t aim at something you don’t intend to shoot so are they aiming at the BLM? They are actually willing to kill BLM personnel over this? I’m very OK with a militia who is trained just like our military to defend our borders and the borders of the state in which they live.
james
[/quote]
I completely agree. I would be ok with the militia doing this receiving a bullet in the head as a result of their actions.[/quote]
Which actions did they do that made them worthy of death? Tell us all about it, you purveyor of liberty, you.[/quote]
I believe that the militia coming onto land that does not belong to them or the person they are supporting, and raising a firearm into a horizontal position in the general direction of the BLM deserves a bullet to the head.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Hey dix, you and James have some things in common.[/quote]
You and I have some things in common as well
[quote]
No wonder you two agree on this. Wasn’t too long ago right here on PWI he was wishing death on another group of innocent folks too. Funny how the world turns.[/quote]
I don’t care about views from another thread when having a debate in this thread. It is funny how the world turns when you bring up another thread that I have no clue what you are talking about in making a point of why we agree on this thread.
The militia in this discussion are not innocent, they have brought firearms to a stand off and raised those firearms in the direction of the BLM
[quote]
Usually though with the likes of you, it’s ya’ll hoping someone else does the killing. [/quote]
I am not “hoping” for anyone to get killed
[quote]
Pussies.[/quote]
Did you really just call me a pussy???
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Hey dix, you and James have some things in common. No wonder you two agree on this. Wasn’t too long ago right here on PWI he was wishing death on another group of innocent folks too. Funny how the world turns.
Usually though with the likes of you, it’s ya’ll hoping someone else does the killing. Pussies.[/quote]
LOL…I never wished death on another group of people. You’ve twisted my words.
I don’t understand the personal attacks.
Regarding wishing someone else does the killing, how many years of carrying a rifle for this country do you have under your belt? How many 6 month - 1 year deployments have you made?
james