[quote]LarryDavid wrote:
Interesting article on the potential effects on the league and it’s perception of greatness after the LeBron trade:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/ian_thomsen/07/16/lebron/index.html
Basically they’re saying that Jordan redefined the notion of greatness by himself, and that before MJ great individual players were looked over in favour of winning team oriented players [think Wilt Chamberlain vs. Bill Russel]. Jordan early on in his career was lumped into that category of great individual players who couldn’t win it all, but changed that by winning all over the place.
If James opts to be more like Magic and less like MJ [the two guys he was always compared to, anyway], this will turn out to be a smashing success. It seemed like he always wanted to be more of a Magic type player, so this isn’t hard to imagine at all. Wade would be the go to scorer, with James and Bosh being secondary options, but James would be the undisputed runner of the offense.
And if this team ended up being the dominant team of this decade, the NBA would revert to it’s old standards of judging players.
I don’t really agree with the article but it did bring up some good points/perspective. One thing is, MJ’s the GOAT no contest, yet there’s no clear cut #2. And MJ is considered THAT much better than whoever is #2 anyway. That will NOT change. The reason for that is because MJ did both, he was a dominant shoot-first individual player and he led his team to rings, too. No other player before him can really say that [Bird was a great passer]. You were either one or the other [in Wilts case, one and THEN the other].
The only guy after him who fits that description is Kobe, and only in the past two years. Before that he was another guy who won as one of the big players on a talented squad, but could win as undisputed leader. If anybody from this generation creeps up to be #2 it’s Kobe, and that’s saying something considering Tim Duncan has had almost as good a career.
If James wants to be Magic, he’s volunteered for being less than GOAT, because Magic isn’t even the consensus pick for 2nd best ever. So it’s still disappointing that he chose this route. If he wanted to get past Boston he should have developed a better outside game. Boston’s D is perfect for stopping people trying to score from closer to the net, but they have no answer for good outside shooting. And anyone who say the last two games of that series knew that this was a man who was not confident him his shooting. He couldn’t score in the paint but he kept going there and resorted to some bad passes to get himself out of trouble.[/quote]
Holy sh!t, I didnt read any of it but I applaud you for actually writing that much.