Natural Upper Range Total Test

Obviously people come here for answers to their new Dx or help in tweaking the medications or dosing schedule they are on. What I would like to know is why, if the upper range is 1100, does almost everyone report numbers like 300-500. Some report 700 but usually on some SERM or 200mg Cyp/wk.

I would like to see more independent data on Total testosterone levels in various age groups than what is currently available. One table I found on a Men’s Hormonal Health website had my levels of 300 in the over 80 crowd. Now I’m sceptical that >700 is normal.

[quote]C27 H40 O3 wrote:

I’m sceptical that >700 is normal. [/quote]

I agree. You will very seldom get a natural healthy guy on message boards posting levels above 750. It is almost unheard of. Those high upper ranges you mention are a red herring - they are supposedly derived from the 95th percentile of a population AFAICR, but don’t appear to be repeatable, so I would take them with a grain of salt. Other labs have upper ranges in the 800s, which seem to me more realistic.

One explanation could be that a particular lab’s testing equipment is less accurate in the upper part of the range, leading to inflated readings there.

The tables in the link dhickey posted show a mean T level for 20-somethings to be in the 600s, and SHBG somewhere in the mid-30s. Those numbers are much more modest compared to what a lot of guys try to achieve on TRT.

Thanks dhickey, that’s the one I was referring to. Sadly it also seems to be the only one. At 1996 it couldn’t even be used as a reliable source in a research paper. For some reason I thought the 20yo’s were higher than that. Makes me feel better knowing my trough is 440 on 50mg cyp/wk.

I had another one that was pretty similar, but I can’t seem to find the study.

Different labs seem to have different results and ranges, so it might be a little tricky comparing this to your labcorp results. Total T doesn’t seem to differ as much as free T , or Bio T.

I would just aim for the upper part or the normal Free T range. With labcorp, this would be 20-25 or so. I feel pretty good in that area if E2 is about the same. Trying some different things right now and probably in the low teens. Everything feels the same accept libido. I can still perform, but desire is very muted unless stimulated.

I did a blood test a couple months ago and got 932 ng/dl total test. I’m 18 years old. I’m showing symptoms of low test, though.

I think there’s selection bias involved here.

Most of the people with upper-quartile measurements of TT aren’t going to be searching out TRT message boards posting their numbers up.

It’d be like wondering why a cancer survivors’ forum has so few people on it without cancer. The topic selects the audience.

[quote]dhickey wrote:
I had another one that was pretty similar, but I can’t seem to find the study.

Different labs seem to have different results and ranges, so it might be a little tricky comparing this to your labcorp results. Total T doesn’t seem to differ as much as free T , or Bio T.

I would just aim for the upper part or the normal Free T range. With labcorp, this would be 20-25 or so. I feel pretty good in that area if E2 is about the same. Trying some different things right now and probably in the low teens. Everything feels the same accept libido. I can still perform, but desire is very muted unless stimulated. [/quote]

hope the files will be attached.

Clinical Endocrinology (2005) 62, 64-73
Normal, bound and nonbound testosterone levels in normally
ageing men: results from the Massachusetts Male Ageing
Study

Beth A. Mohr*, Andre T. Guayâ? , Amy B. Oâ??Donnell* and John B. McKinlay*
*
New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA and
â?Â
Center for Sexual Function/Endocrinology, Lahey
Clinic Northshore, Peabody, Massachusetts, USA


Same article more data

Same article more data

found again link to full article:

http://imperialendo.co.uk/mohr.pdf

or

http://www.slideshare.net/roger961/normal-bound-and-nonbound-testosterone-levels-in-normally

Thanks John, great find.