[quote]Magma299 wrote:
spamme wrote:
Magma299 wrote:
To Vroom and Spamme,
I guess my idea of someone that deserves to be roughed up and your idea are two totally different things.
That goes without question. My guess is your idea of who needs to be roughed up would vary from most of the free world.
For me to be a dick to somebody they are going to have to behave pretty bad verbally before I get to that point.
Actually most likely what happened in New Orleans. Guy probably said something rude and police decided to “rough him up” for it. Sounds to me like you would fit right in, and I hear they are looking for some more cops there.
And Vroom you are correct the police are not the judge or jury…never have I met someone on the force who thought they were.
The fact you would need to get to “that point” for a verbal disparage, suggests a variance in the definition of judge and jury as well.
There were alot of things I didnt like cops doing when I wasnt one…now I understand why they do some of those things. (As I am sure someone will twist this into abusing someone).
No. Its self explanatory.
Sounds like someone had a bad exp with the police…with that attitude I wonder why?
[/quote]
Other than two speeding tickets, last about 12 years ago, havent had any experience on receiving end. And since I am white, I have never been stopped, as someone else put it, for DWB.
Though recently, I have had two vicarious negative experiences. One was watching that video tape. The other was listening to you use the phrase “deserved roughed up”, almost as if to trivialize and rationalize police brutality, when you feels its appropriate.
My attitude towards the police in my area is very positive. In the ER, I interact with them all the time. Not once have I heard one of them use the phrase “deserved roughing up”.
So just to be clear, I dont have a problem with police in general, just those who abuse, and those who think its ok in some circumstances.