I think that is a large part of what this debate really boils down to, and it’s obvious why each party wants what they want. As for actual fraud, I don’t think Trump or the Republicans are beyond taking advantage either, they would just have to be more careful about it as opposed to the Democrats for whom anything can be justified because it’s about bringing down Trump or white supremacy, cisgender privilege, etc.
Lol, we have people on this forum condoning shouting “white power” and killing people because its bringing down BLM/antifa/decomcrats. I assure you, the republicans will do things just as egregious as anything the democrats will.
Its a game to the politicians in power and we the people are the pawns.
1 Like
Maybe, but the way things are going with all the rioting and such the Republicans look like the semi-reasonable party.
I don’t even have a horse in this race, I live in Canada and Trump is not exactly good for us, starting a 2nd trade war now when both economies are fucked. I obviously don’t like the Democrats, but it’s possible that if they win it would benefit me in one way or another. For one, when the US dollar is really low then things are significantly cheaper in Canada. There are Canadians who like Trump, but it’s mostly because they would like to have a prime minister like that in Canada, not because he did us any favors.
Because people who call themselves socialists and Marxists despise the working class that Marxism is supposed to be helping as much as the elitists do.
Much of the money BLM gets in donations goes to democratic politicians.
No.
The big issue would be that you can enforce voter id via online voting.
It’s harder to stuff the ballot box that way.
Besides all the dead people in Chicago would have problems voting too.
Keep in mind that I believe Georgia or Alabama allowed a widower to also vote for the deceased spouse for a few yers after their death.
I think that was in the 80’s. It made the news because they debated it could only be done for 3 years after their death, because after that time you couldn’t be sure on what they would have wanted.
2 Likes
What the husband would have wanted? Did they change the law because they felt it was cruel to mock the dead like this? lol
It was a lengthy debate in the state senate.
I’m pretty sure it was in Georgia.
Same area where they would count urban votes as 3/5 verus rural.
I am a Canadian voter who hasn’t gone past this post in this thread, but if there was a significant risk the last time around of maybe the Russians hacking into things, how tempting would it be for them to rig the results this time or the future?
1 Like
Who the hell said any of this? Seems most people are condemning violence of all kinds here. Some just choose to be blind to the violence because it’s coming from the left.
Minneapolis Police investigating ballot harvesting. Military votes lost in delivery.
We’re over a month out and already shenanigans.
…and folks…the Russians have done a damn good job in this arena…
You can believe it or not believe it…your choice…
Minnesota is corrupt as shit. biden will win it…
Just keeping it real…
This…and this…
Since your keeping it real, do you have any real evidence of vote mishandling or corruption in Alabama and Louisiana? I am not saying there isn’t any, but I haven’t seen it. So if you have evidence of malfeasance, by all means post it.
I want the election to be fair regardless of outcome. I want the system to emerge victorious more than my candidate. If we lose faith in the institution, then we are in real trouble.
47 million votes already cast 
And that’s just in SoCal!! (this bit is a joke)
1 Like
So we have seen missing ballots, multiple ballots, lost ballots, ballots to the wrong people, ballots to the dead, questionable “drop boxes”, prefilled forms sent out, boxes set on fire, stand over tactics and bribes… Multiple times!
We can just about guarantee the court will decide the election at this point.
1 Like
It seems almost certain that a majority of mail in votes will be by Democrats.
In some states, it is very clear that mail ins are only valid if they are counted on Election day.
It is highly likely that if leading on election Day, that the Republicans will take a change of that lead to court.
Now we are seeing a few places that are saying they will not count any mail in votes until after the election (seems mainly Republican at this point). Which is interesting timing to say the least.
It seems the people who instilled this did not even think about the ways this could be corrupted because it is being fucked from all angles by everyone.
At least from what I have heard they need to be received by a certain time (8 PM is what I have heard) on election day. Not counted.
Could be wrong?
I don’t see how they could possibly win that one. Elections past have had states change lead after election day.
Going tomorrow!