[quote]Tex Ag wrote:
MaximusB wrote:
Tex Ag wrote:
MaximusB wrote:
I take the view that muscle is better because on the most basic level, it’s hard to build. The dedication and discipline it takes day in and day out, would show in their character and work ethic.
What about genetics? Not everyone has to do the same amount of work for the same results.
As a teacher I know that effort is not always easily apparent in the results. I have worked with many students who struggled with the concepts, who put in more work than other students, and who still got lower grades.
Same applies to the body as well.[/quote
Why worry about something you have no control over? Am I not going to push weight because I have shitty insertion points on my body, I am an endomorph who has to work even harder to drop fat, and may lack any and everything required to have a nice physique?
Your work with your students who have struggled is no different, because through that work, you will learn more about yourself and be on the path to what does work. There are not many things that can teach better than failure, if you let it.
I do not disagree. I just wanted to point out that when looking at someone else’s build it is tenuous to assign how much effort they have made. That is what this thread is about,judgments made of others based on apparent muscularity.
Your example above could be viewed as less dedicated and disciplined than the guy who stays lean puts on muscle easily.
[/quote]
I don’t judge anyone by their build or stature, because what could they do about it? I have just as much respect as the skinny guy who is busting ass as the guy who has a larger structure. Do I have any less respect for someone like Frank Zane because he isn’t “built” like Lou Ferrigno? Of course not.
The guy who stays lean and put on muscle easily still has to work to stay lean or build muscle. More work or less work, don’t sweat the small shit. Do the work.