Mrs. Obama Breaks the Law

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
41

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Wow - Super-T transcended the bounds of mortal trolldom in just a few weeks and he’s barely breaking a sweat!

In such a short time he nearly surpassed trolldeities like Headhunter; if he keeps producing 100% perfectly pure yet refined bs at this rate, we might have a discussion board singularity in a month at our hands.

Should I try to stop or befriend him?[/quote]
I do not really know what you are trying to say, so I do not know how to respond. Any way thanks for looking at my post… I guess.

42

Imagine if Sarah Palin had done this. Many here would be calling for arrest and ranting on about ‘how stupid she is’.

“She doesn’t even know the law she just agreed to!! Har, har, har!!!”

Fucking liberal hypocrits!

43

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]Dre the Hatchet wrote:
OP, you should work on you spelling. “thier” “leberal”, etc. And that inbred lazy eye… And maybe get some education…
Other than that, enjoy your 4-year fox-news shark week about teh evilz of nazi-communist-black-panther Obama.

I’ll just leave this here:

WOW, the only thing you can throw at me is my spelling. How about arguing the facts. You either know I am right and don’t want to look like an ass, or you are not intelligent enough to debate. Either way more power to you, and if you are going to blast some one for spelling you should really make sure you can spell. If you can’t find your mistake it is in the first entence. you left an R out of your. You say I need education, well I think we all know that you can not start a sentence with and. In fact most of your post is sentence fragments. Learn how to use punctuation. Have a nice day.[/quote]

  1. Lol at “facts”.

So Michelle Obama ate a cheeseburger, that’s a fact. You look like you eat lots of cheeseburgers and don’t lift, that’s a fact. Michelle Obama may or may not have said a sentence which some lazy-eyed inbred rednecks get their panties all up in a bunch about. NOT a fact, since it comes from one extremely slanted article without sources.
Obama is just like Hitler for changing the health care system, because, you know, that’s what Hitler was all about- socialized medicine. NOT a fact (not to mention that you’re already PAYING for your neighbors mishaps through medicare, it’s just more inefficient).
The tea party is a group of uneducated, naive and easily manipulated rednecks using the “Founding Fathers” in every sentence, though they couldn’t name any of them if questioned. That’s a fact.
Glenn Beck’s colorful charts about New World Order and the ties between Obama, dem there Terrorists, the Nazis (who else), the Communists and whatnot are NOT based on facts.

Here’s another fact for you: You can start a sentence with a conjunction; the rules have changed.

44

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Imagine if Sarah Palin had done this. Many here would be calling for arrest and ranting on about ‘how stupid she is’.

“She doesn’t even know the law she just agreed to!! Har, har, har!!!”

Fucking liberal hypocrits![/quote]

You are spot on with this. Just like when we hear racist comments from someone on the left, they’re immediately forgiven and pushed to the side. Does anyone remember Joe Biden’s description of Obama? “I mean you got this first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.” What if Trent Lott said that? They’d have to jail him for at least 5 years.

There’s a clear double standard in America. How we let the politically correct hijack our country I’ll never know, but it’s time to take it back.

Michelle Obama can obey the election laws like the rest of us peasants or pay the price. And the lefty sycophants around here look like a bunch of hypocrites for claiming otherwise.

45

[quote]Dre the Hatchet wrote:

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]Dre the Hatchet wrote:
OP, you should work on you spelling. “thier” “leberal”, etc. And that inbred lazy eye… And maybe get some education…
Other than that, enjoy your 4-year fox-news shark week about teh evilz of nazi-communist-black-panther Obama.

I’ll just leave this here:

WOW, the only thing you can throw at me is my spelling. How about arguing the facts. You either know I am right and don’t want to look like an ass, or you are not intelligent enough to debate. Either way more power to you, and if you are going to blast some one for spelling you should really make sure you can spell. If you can’t find your mistake it is in the first entence. you left an R out of your. You say I need education, well I think we all know that you can not start a sentence with and. In fact most of your post is sentence fragments. Learn how to use punctuation. Have a nice day.[/quote]

  1. Lol at “facts”.

So Michelle Obama ate a cheeseburger, that’s a fact. You look like you eat lots of cheeseburgers and don’t lift, that’s a fact. Michelle Obama may or may not have said a sentence which some lazy-eyed inbred rednecks get their panties all up in a bunch about. NOT a fact, since it comes from one extremely slanted article without sources.
Obama is just like Hitler for changing the health care system, because, you know, that’s what Hitler was all about- socialized medicine. NOT a fact (not to mention that you’re already PAYING for your neighbors mishaps through medicare, it’s just more inefficient).
The tea party is a group of uneducated, naive and easily manipulated rednecks using the “Founding Fathers” in every sentence, though they couldn’t name any of them if questioned. That’s a fact.
Glenn Beck’s colorful charts about New World Order and the ties between Obama, dem there Terrorists, the Nazis (who else), the Communists and whatnot are NOT based on facts.

Here’s another fact for you: You can start a sentence with a conjunction; the rules have changed.

[/quote]

If you think the Tea party could not name a founding father you are a moron. I can get you another article saying the same thing if you think this one is slanted. Why don’t you try to use less insults and more logic. You seem to have a very negative view of the Tea party and you are extremely wrong. I encourage you to attend a meeting, and if you can put your hate aside you may learn something.

46

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

You seem to have a very negative view of the Tea party and you are extremely wrong. I encourage you to attend a meeting, and if you can put your hate aside you may learn something. [/quote]

The lefty’s don’t have to attend a Tea Party meeting they inherently know that the Tea Party is a racist organization. Besides they must be racist they’re against Obama and his socialist agenda.

47

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Wow - Super-T transcended the bounds of mortal trolldom in just a few weeks and he’s barely breaking a sweat!

In such a short time he nearly surpassed trolldeities like Headhunter; if he keeps producing 100% perfectly pure yet refined bs at this rate, we might have a discussion board singularity in a month at our hands.

Should I try to stop or befriend him?[/quote]

Super-T really just seems to be doing a bad ZEB impersonation. All his retorts have kinda taken the basic mold of ZEB’s, but without the ingenuity of insult.

48

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
SUPER-T, you seem to be arguing for restriction of free speech and made the statement in another thread that lawyers are part of the reason for America leaving the constitution. This is odd, seeing as how free speech is a basic right guaranteed from our constitution and most all the founding fathers had connections to the law or were in fact lawyers.

Such a strange man, with a comical avatar.

GTFO.[/quote]

How am I arguing for restriction of free speech. She can say what ever she wants, but voting law says you can not do it in the polling office, and she did. Yes alot of the founders were connected to the law, but that was when we had men with integrity.[/quote]

So there are no more lawyers with integrity?

49

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
SUPER-T, you seem to be arguing for restriction of free speech and made the statement in another thread that lawyers are part of the reason for America leaving the constitution. This is odd, seeing as how free speech is a basic right guaranteed from our constitution and most all the founding fathers had connections to the law or were in fact lawyers.

Such a strange man, with a comical avatar.

GTFO.[/quote]

How am I arguing for restriction of free speech. She can say what ever she wants, but voting law says you can not do it in the polling office, and she did. Yes alot of the founders were connected to the law, but that was when we had men with integrity.[/quote]

So there are no more lawyers with integrity? [/quote]

Not in the Government, at least not in my opinion.

50

[quote]siouxperman wrote:

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Wow - Super-T transcended the bounds of mortal trolldom in just a few weeks and he’s barely breaking a sweat!

In such a short time he nearly surpassed trolldeities like Headhunter; if he keeps producing 100% perfectly pure yet refined bs at this rate, we might have a discussion board singularity in a month at our hands.

Should I try to stop or befriend him?[/quote]

Super-T really just seems to be doing a bad ZEB impersonation. All his retorts have kinda taken the basic mold of ZEB’s, but without the ingenuity of insult.[/quote]

You mean i use facts, reqasoning, and logic. Thanks.

51

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]siouxperman wrote:

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Wow - Super-T transcended the bounds of mortal trolldom in just a few weeks and he’s barely breaking a sweat!

In such a short time he nearly surpassed trolldeities like Headhunter; if he keeps producing 100% perfectly pure yet refined bs at this rate, we might have a discussion board singularity in a month at our hands.

Should I try to stop or befriend him?[/quote]

Super-T really just seems to be doing a bad ZEB impersonation. All his retorts have kinda taken the basic mold of ZEB’s, but without the ingenuity of insult.[/quote]

You mean i use facts, reqasoning, and logic. Thanks.[/quote]

No, no. I said a BAD impersonation.

And for as much as ZEB is against teh gays, you guys have really got a blossoming bromance.

52

[quote]siouxperman wrote:

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]siouxperman wrote:

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Wow - Super-T transcended the bounds of mortal trolldom in just a few weeks and he’s barely breaking a sweat!

In such a short time he nearly surpassed trolldeities like Headhunter; if he keeps producing 100% perfectly pure yet refined bs at this rate, we might have a discussion board singularity in a month at our hands.

Should I try to stop or befriend him?[/quote]

Super-T really just seems to be doing a bad ZEB impersonation. All his retorts have kinda taken the basic mold of ZEB’s, but without the ingenuity of insult.[/quote]

You mean i use facts, reqasoning, and logic. Thanks.[/quote]

No, no. I said a BAD impersonation.

And for as much as ZEB is against teh gays, you guys have really got a blossoming bromance.[/quote]

Apparently certain conservative values espoused on this (and other) threads cause you to feel threatened. You seem genuinely surprised that there are others who feel as I do? Should we chalk that off to your political naivete? Here’s some good advice; you better not watch any media on November 2nd. If a few simple comments can drive you this crazy you’ll be in a coma by the end of election day.

:slight_smile:

53

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
SUPER-T, you seem to be arguing for restriction of free speech and made the statement in another thread that lawyers are part of the reason for America leaving the constitution. This is odd, seeing as how free speech is a basic right guaranteed from our constitution and most all the founding fathers had connections to the law or were in fact lawyers.

Such a strange man, with a comical avatar.

GTFO.[/quote]

How am I arguing for restriction of free speech. She can say what ever she wants, but voting law says you can not do it in the polling office, and she did. Yes alot of the founders were connected to the law, but that was when we had men with integrity.[/quote]

So there are no more lawyers with integrity? [/quote]

Not in the Government, at least not in my opinion.
[/quote]

So the only ones with integrity are the ones that agree with you?

54

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
SUPER-T, you seem to be arguing for restriction of free speech and made the statement in another thread that lawyers are part of the reason for America leaving the constitution. This is odd, seeing as how free speech is a basic right guaranteed from our constitution and most all the founding fathers had connections to the law or were in fact lawyers.

Such a strange man, with a comical avatar.

GTFO.[/quote]

How am I arguing for restriction of free speech. She can say what ever she wants, but voting law says you can not do it in the polling office, and she did. Yes alot of the founders were connected to the law, but that was when we had men with integrity.[/quote]

So there are no more lawyers with integrity? [/quote]

Not in the Government, at least not in my opinion.
[/quote]

So the only ones with integrity are the ones that agree with you?[/quote]

I did not say that. I said in my opinion there are not any lawyers in the government with integrity. Conservative or liberal, they are still corrupt; If you know of any please share the names, and we can go from there.

55

[quote]siouxperman wrote:

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]siouxperman wrote:

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Wow - Super-T transcended the bounds of mortal trolldom in just a few weeks and he’s barely breaking a sweat!

In such a short time he nearly surpassed trolldeities like Headhunter; if he keeps producing 100% perfectly pure yet refined bs at this rate, we might have a discussion board singularity in a month at our hands.

Should I try to stop or befriend him?[/quote]

Super-T really just seems to be doing a bad ZEB impersonation. All his retorts have kinda taken the basic mold of ZEB’s, but without the ingenuity of insult.[/quote]

You mean i use facts, reqasoning, and logic. Thanks.[/quote]

No, no. I said a BAD impersonation.

And for as much as ZEB is against teh gays, you guys have really got a blossoming bromance.[/quote]

What can I say? Great minds think alike. Maybe when you take your partisan glasses; you will start to see a little better. You seem to be left leaning. I say that because all you do is say we are wrong and throw out insults. If I am wrong how about posting your evidence, and lets have a discussion.

56

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]siouxperman wrote:

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]siouxperman wrote:

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Wow - Super-T transcended the bounds of mortal trolldom in just a few weeks and he’s barely breaking a sweat!

In such a short time he nearly surpassed trolldeities like Headhunter; if he keeps producing 100% perfectly pure yet refined bs at this rate, we might have a discussion board singularity in a month at our hands.

Should I try to stop or befriend him?[/quote]

Super-T really just seems to be doing a bad ZEB impersonation. All his retorts have kinda taken the basic mold of ZEB’s, but without the ingenuity of insult.[/quote]

You mean i use facts, reqasoning, and logic. Thanks.[/quote]

No, no. I said a BAD impersonation.

And for as much as ZEB is against teh gays, you guys have really got a blossoming bromance.[/quote]

What can I say? Great minds think alike. Maybe when you take your partisan glasses; you will start to see a little better. You seem to be left leaning. I say that because all you do is say we are wrong and throw out insults. If I am wrong how about posting your evidence, and lets have a discussion.[/quote]

I implied that you were wrong in thinking that this stuff is a big deal. That’s a subjective call, ie there is no hard evidence. And do you really want to be the one calling people out for being partisan? You’re MO is democrat bashing, and you’re not even good at it. If I’m left leaning then that must mean you’re knocking people over trying to get to the far side of right.

Also, because someone called you out and correctly used a semicolon doesn’t mean that you should incorrectly use one when calling someone else out. Doesn’t really help your case.

57

[quote]siouxperman wrote:

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]siouxperman wrote:

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]siouxperman wrote:

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Wow - Super-T transcended the bounds of mortal trolldom in just a few weeks and he’s barely breaking a sweat!

In such a short time he nearly surpassed trolldeities like Headhunter; if he keeps producing 100% perfectly pure yet refined bs at this rate, we might have a discussion board singularity in a month at our hands.

Should I try to stop or befriend him?[/quote]

Super-T really just seems to be doing a bad ZEB impersonation. All his retorts have kinda taken the basic mold of ZEB’s, but without the ingenuity of insult.[/quote]

You mean i use facts, reqasoning, and logic. Thanks.[/quote]

No, no. I said a BAD impersonation.

And for as much as ZEB is against teh gays, you guys have really got a blossoming bromance.[/quote]

What can I say? Great minds think alike. Maybe when you take your partisan glasses; you will start to see a little better. You seem to be left leaning. I say that because all you do is say we are wrong and throw out insults. If I am wrong how about posting your evidence, and lets have a discussion.[/quote]

I implied that you were wrong in thinking that this stuff is a big deal. That’s a subjective call, ie there is no hard evidence. And do you really want to be the one calling people out for being partisan? You’re MO is democrat bashing, and you’re not even good at it. If I’m left leaning then that must mean you’re knocking people over trying to get to the far side of right.

Also, because someone called you out and correctly used a semicolon doesn’t mean that you should incorrectly use one when calling someone else out. Doesn’t really help your case.
[/quote]

I do not try to bash the dems, they just make it so easy. I am also equal oppurtunity. I will call out the republicans too. What kind of evidence do you want. Of course she is not going to admitt she did anything wrong. all we have is the mans word saying she did. You seem to think that is not enough to launch an investigation. Using your logic a crime victim should not even go to the police unless they have a video because all they have is thier word. now like always insult me about my spelling, and back your self up with no facts.

58

[quote]siouxperman wrote:

Also, because someone called you out and correctly used a semicolon doesn’t mean that you should incorrectly use one when calling someone else out. Doesn’t really help your case.
[/quote]

Your comments are low brow. I can’t think of anyone, you included that doesn’t make an occasional spelling or grammatical error. This is a message board not a doctoral thesis. Try to relax and have fun.

59

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Wow - Super-T transcended the bounds of mortal trolldom in just a few weeks and he’s barely breaking a sweat!

In such a short time he nearly surpassed trolldeities like Headhunter; if he keeps producing 100% perfectly pure yet refined bs at this rate, we might have a discussion board singularity in a month at our hands.

Should I try to stop or befriend him?[/quote]

I was thinking the same thing. If he is a troll, it’s been an amazing job.

60

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]siouxperman wrote:

Also, because someone called you out and correctly used a semicolon doesn’t mean that you should incorrectly use one when calling someone else out. Doesn’t really help your case.
[/quote]

Your comments are low brow. I can’t think of anyone, you included that doesn’t make an occasional spelling or grammatical error. This is a message board not a doctoral thesis. Try to relax and have fun.[/quote]

I’m acutely aware of that, and I’m not typically one to get all uppity about it. But this guy really pushes the boundaries. I mean, it’s stupid obvious that he got pissed because someone used “advanced English” on him, so he hitched up his britches and tried to do the same. I mean, know your limits. Shit, if you are really terrible at writing then put in a little extra effort. Message board or not, rampant spelling errors/grammatical issues/poor syntax, makes it really difficult to take someone seriously.

Back to the topic. I never said don’t go and attempt to have this legally dealt with, just don’t expect to get anywhere with it. This is one of those things that’s dealt with in the court of public opinion. Had it been Palin then yeah, democrats would be pointing fingers (just like you’re doing, is the irony lost here?) and repubilcans would be downplaying it. More than likely it wouldn’t become an actual legal issue with her either. To quote Palin herself, this is just a “gotcha” moment. For fucks sake she couldn’t answer a single question Couric asked her in that old interview (yeah, I brought it up), but to republicans it was all just a big witch hunt (Speaking of witch hunts, O’Donnell could use a little magic in her campaign). I realize it’s not against the law to be devoid of worthwhile knowledge, but it’s more concerning. And ZEB, don’t go and make a joke about how I’m lucky that it isn’t against the law. I know you were thinking it, but step your game up.

Also, I’m under no delusion that the democrats aren’t going to have a bad election year.