I must be so clever that I outsmarted myself.
What exactly did I do?
Mufasa
[quote]Mufasa wrote:
I must be so clever that I outsmarted myself.
What exactly did I do?
Mufasa[/quote]
You wrote exactly the same post in 2 different threads thereby exposing the ridiculousness of said threads and made a mockery of those trawling through dubious online sources in order to run a silly, embarabssing attempt at a smear campaign.
Isn’t that what you did?
Edit: And I in a stroke of genius due in no small part to you wrote the exact same response to you in both threads. I really can be quite hilarious.
I would stop getting my news exclusively from “the blaze”.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
This story^ doesn’t include the quote in question.
[quote]Spartiates wrote:
[quote]SUPER-T wrote:
[quote]Grneyes wrote:
You can’t tell me that people waiting in line to cast a vote for a politician won’t discuss said election/politician. Please…That’s a stupid law in circumstances of regular citizens. I remember being in line for the Presidential election and heard people having “political discussions”…You can’t control what people talk about in line. [/quote]
She is not a regular citizen, and even a regular citizen cant stand there and say we need to vote for so and so to keep an agenda going.[/quote]
If she’s not a regular citizen what is she? She’s not an elected official, a paid partisan, or political operative…
[/quote]
She is the first lady, and they usually have thier own agenda as a side project, which would make her a politcal operative.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Inner Hulk wrote:
And it’s one man claiming she said this, I suppose I have to believe him?[/quote]
[quote]Obama abided by election laws that prohibit electioneering within 100 feet of a polling place.
She did pose for pictures and told one voter: “Make sure you get everybody out there voting. This one counts, as much as the other one.”[/quote]
Well, when you are looking for anything at all, finding out the truth takes backseat.
I do love the “question” in the title of that blog when it is really an accusation.
LA Times as well:
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-michelle-obama-vote-20101015,0,7000914.story
It’s a good thing people are now guilty until proven innocent.[/quote]
Wow two leberal papers with the excact same report. You really made your point here.
[quote]Spartiates wrote:
I would stop getting my news exclusively from “the blaze”.[/quote]
The actuall story came straight from the drudge report.
[quote]Mufasa wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
She’s black. She could stand outside the polls with a baseball bat purposefully intimidating white people. The DOJ could already have a default conviction and the charges would be dropped because the DOJ as policy wonÃ?¢??t pursue litigation against minorities.
I know it sounds like a big joke, but the sad part is, that’s the literal truth.
[/quote]
Duce:
PLEASE tell me you’re making some point about “White Collar” (somewhat ironic term) crime…and not conviction rates in general in the U.S.?
Mufasa [/quote]
I was sarcastically pointing out there are more important things the DOJ SHOULD be pursuing.
[quote]Spartiates wrote:
[quote]SUPER-T wrote:
[quote]Grneyes wrote:
You can’t tell me that people waiting in line to cast a vote for a politician won’t discuss said election/politician. Please…That’s a stupid law in circumstances of regular citizens. I remember being in line for the Presidential election and heard people having “political discussions”…You can’t control what people talk about in line. [/quote]
She is not a regular citizen, and even a regular citizen cant stand there and say we need to vote for so and so to keep an agenda going.[/quote]
If she’s not a regular citizen what is she? She’s not an elected official, a paid partisan, or political operative…
[/quote]
Um, she travels on the tax payer dime with SS protection. And she is currently on the campaign trail with the president making appearances and giving speeches much the same way she did when she helped get him elected.
She does receive/spend taxpayer money and she most certainly is a political operative.
I don’t think this is a huge deal (like the black panther case), but she really shouldn’t have and definitely knows better.
Regardless of your political affiliation there is so much to complain about in American politics. This is not one of those things. Nor was the “Obama eats hamburgers” thread.
[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
Regardless of your political affiliation there is so much to complain about in American politics. This is not one of those things. Nor was the “Obama eats hamburgers” thread. [/quote]
Cool Lanky, you are at least consistent. You are running around from one Michelle Obama thread to the other telling everyone that these topics are just too small to worry about.
[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
Regardless of your political affiliation there is so much to complain about in American politics. This is not one of those things. Nor was the “Obama eats hamburgers” thread. [/quote]
True compared to alot of other things it seems that I am making a mountain out of a mole hill, but ever heard of the phrase give some one an inch and they will take a mile. That is the point behind this post. If it was someone else they would have had to leave, but since it was her every boby is likw we will let it slide. How much do you let slide untill you finally say enough is enough. In my book she should be held to the same standard as anyone else. As far as the burger thread if you read it, I say that all I was trying to point out was that if they think that food like that is so bad, and they have to protect us from it and advertisors then they should stay away from it. I would not have made a big deal if all she said was to eat it less, but they want to tell advertisers what they can and cant do in a commercial, and I think that is messed up.
I truly hope we will never see Carla Sarkozy eating an hamburger
then it would be a serious issue.
a truly unforgivable crime against Aesthetics.
we should even make a law forbiding our first lady to ruin her ass.
[quote]kamui wrote:
I truly hope we will never see Carla Sarkozy eating an hamburger
then it would be a serious issue.
a truly unforgivable crime against Aesthetics.
we should even make a law forbiding our first lady to ruin her ass.
[/quote]
an hamburger
SUPER-T, you seem to be arguing for restriction of free speech and made the statement in another thread that lawyers are part of the reason for America leaving the constitution. This is odd, seeing as how free speech is a basic right guaranteed from our constitution and most all the founding fathers had connections to the law or were in fact lawyers.
Such a strange man, with a comical avatar.
GTFO.
[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
Regardless of your political affiliation there is so much to complain about in American politics. This is not one of those things. Nor was the “Obama eats hamburgers” thread. [/quote]
x2
[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
SUPER-T, you seem to be arguing for restriction of free speech and made the statement in another thread that lawyers are part of the reason for America leaving the constitution. This is odd, seeing as how free speech is a basic right guaranteed from our constitution and most all the founding fathers had connections to the law or were in fact lawyers.
Such a strange man, with a comical avatar.
GTFO.[/quote]
How am I arguing for restriction of free speech. She can say what ever she wants, but voting law says you can not do it in the polling office, and she did. Yes alot of the founders were connected to the law, but that was when we had men with integrity.
OP, you should work on you spelling. “thier” “leberal”, etc. And that inbred lazy eye… And maybe get some education…
Other than that, enjoy your 4-year fox-news shark week about teh evilz of nazi-communist-black-panther Obama.
I’ll just leave this here:
Wow - Super-T transcended the bounds of mortal trolldom in just a few weeks and he’s barely breaking a sweat!
In such a short time he nearly surpassed trolldeities like Headhunter; if he keeps producing 100% perfectly pure yet refined bs at this rate, we might have a discussion board singularity in a month at our hands.
Should I try to stop or befriend him?
[quote]Dre the Hatchet wrote:
OP, you should work on you spelling. “thier” “leberal”, etc. And that inbred lazy eye… And maybe get some education…
Other than that, enjoy your 4-year fox-news shark week about teh evilz of nazi-communist-black-panther Obama.
I’ll just leave this here:
WOW, the only thing you can throw at me is my spelling. How about arguing the facts. You either know I am right and don’t want to look like an ass, or you are not intelligent enough to debate. Either way more power to you, and if you are going to blast some one for spelling you should really make sure you can spell. If you can’t find your mistake it is in the first entence. you left an R out of your. You say I need education, well I think we all know that you can not start a sentence with and. In fact most of your post is sentence fragments. Learn how to use punctuation. Have a nice day.