Duckface…
[quote]Edevus wrote:
[quote]shadylow wrote:
I didn’t bother watching your video.
Child abuse happens in hetero couples, of course. I never said that it didn’t. Nor did I say that gay adoption is the ONLY form of child abuse.
I merely stated that gay adoption is equal to child abuse. It is a form of child abuse. [/quote]
That’s even more retarded. Thanks for ignoring the video that proves you’re wrong by the way.
Meanwhile addicts (of many sorts), people with negative resources and mentally unstable heterosexual people can keep breeding/growing children, homosexuals, even the good ones, are barred (not everywhere luckily!) from doing so and some people still consider it “child abuse”.
I wonder what would you homophobes do if your kids happened to be homosexual…maybe actually it would lead to a positive mentality change.
[/quote]
HOw could that video prove that I am wrong? It’s my opinion. It will never change.
Pick any kid anywhere and ask him if he would rather be adopted by gay parents than have two normal parents and see what they say. It’s abusive to force a child to grow up in such a way.
I am not homophobic, I just believe that it is wrong.
If my children turned out gay I would advise them against adopting children.
Well, I assumed by now it would have been said but it hasn’t. So I’ll say it. I’d love to punch Jerry Sandusky in the face with my chainsaw. I’d also like to punch anyone related to Penn State’s football program, excluding the players, right in the fucking face with a rabid Tasmanian Devil. Then I’d cornhole each and every one of those fuckers. In fact, I’d ALMOST be willing to fuck a syphilitic prostitute from Vienna just to contract syphilis that I could then infect those assholes with. Merry Christmas!
[quote]shadylow wrote:
[quote]Edevus wrote:
[quote]shadylow wrote:
I didn’t bother watching your video.
Child abuse happens in hetero couples, of course. I never said that it didn’t. Nor did I say that gay adoption is the ONLY form of child abuse.
I merely stated that gay adoption is equal to child abuse. It is a form of child abuse. [/quote]
That’s even more retarded. Thanks for ignoring the video that proves you’re wrong by the way.
Meanwhile addicts (of many sorts), people with negative resources and mentally unstable heterosexual people can keep breeding/growing children, homosexuals, even the good ones, are barred (not everywhere luckily!) from doing so and some people still consider it “child abuse”.
I wonder what would you homophobes do if your kids happened to be homosexual…maybe actually it would lead to a positive mentality change.
[/quote]
HOw could that video prove that I am wrong? It’s my opinion. It will never change.
Pick any kid anywhere and ask him if he would rather be adopted by gay parents than have two normal parents and see what they say. It’s abusive to force a child to grow up in such a way.
I am not homophobic, I just believe that it is wrong.
If my children turned out gay I would advise them against adopting children.
[/quote]
That video shows how a kid who grew in an homosexual couple hasn’t had any issues, therefore, “gay adoption equals child abuse” is incorrect (and insulting).
Pick up any kid and ask him “Would you rather have a daddy and a mommy who would never let you go out, make you do homework and housework all day or two dadies who will let you do whatever, give you candy and videogames all day long?”.
See how silly this logic is? Kids have no idea what is best for them. Nor do many adults, but that’s beside the point.
It’s also abusive to force a child to grow with parents who don’t care about him/her, who are alcoholics, drug addicts, have mental issues, uncontrollable violence bursts, etc.
Don’t you agree with that?
Let’s imagine you have to make a choice for a kid :
- Homosexual couple who have a very loving and caring environment, high education and income and a very positive mindset bathed in ethics and values.
- Heterosexual couple of a father who’s a junkie, beats up his wife and the child, while the wife is an alcoholic who cheats on the husband all the time at home.
Would you believe that the second option is still better?
I was putting something like the best case scenario vs the worst case just to show you a point, I, in no way, defend that all homosexual couples are “perfect” nor heterosexual are a total mess.
That just doesn’t happen.
Sadly the real abuse that the children will suffer is when they go to school and they say they have two daddies or two mommies, because the children of families with homophobic ideas will unleash their prejudices. And children are very, very cruel.
Okay, opinions are opinions, and everyone is entitled to them. Now can we please keep the political opinions/discussions out of it? This thread is supposed to be about who you want to punch in the face, not your opinion on gay marriage, adoption, etc. Start a new thread if that is what you wish to discuss…
On another note, I’d love to hammer-fist the sh*t out of this guy!
Almost every person I’ve ever met…
Rush Limbargh but as well all know and love “SHIT SPLATTERS” Ann Coulter just would not be worth the jail time…
[quote]ugaMMA411 wrote:
Okay, opinions are opinions, and everyone is entitled to them. Now can we please keep the political opinions/discussions out of it? This thread is supposed to be about who you want to punch in the face, not your opinion on gay marriage, adoption, etc. Start a new thread if that is what you wish to discuss…
On another note, I’d love to hammer-fist the sh*t out of this guy! [/quote]
Those people have faces. Faces I’d like to punch.
[quote]Edevus wrote:
[quote]shadylow wrote:
[quote]Edevus wrote:
[quote]shadylow wrote:
I didn’t bother watching your video.
Sadly the real abuse that the children will suffer is when they go to school and they say they have two daddies or two mommies, because the children of families with homophobic ideas will unleash their prejudices. And children are very, very cruel.
[/quote]
This is the reason I am against it. Not because the parents are gay.
[quote]shadylow wrote:
That stupid ass napolean dynamite character. Thinking about him just pisses me off for some reason.[/quote]
I think that’s why we don’t see the actor who played him around much anymore. His face was the joke, so when he would show up to audition for other roles they probably asked him to stop making that face as that joke’s finished…but he can’t!
[quote]shadylow wrote:
This is the reason I am against it. Not because the parents are gay.[/quote]
So you are feeding the same reason that makes you be against it.
Priceless.
[quote]Edevus wrote:
[quote]shadylow wrote:
This is the reason I am against it. Not because the parents are gay.[/quote]
So you are feeding the same reason that makes you be against it.
Priceless.
[/quote]
Yes, let’s save the poor child from being ridiculed by not having any!
What about children from mixed marriages?
What about children with birth defects?
Life is tough, period. What a better way to have kids learn about tolerance.
My most punchable face(s)? Lil’ Wayne - Duck-Lipped Bitches - HoustonGuy
Rush Limbaugh is to the right what Michael Moore is to the left. Both are equally punchable.
Other than that, Bob Costas.
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
Well, I assumed by now it would have been said but it hasn’t. So I’ll say it. I’d love to punch Jerry Sandusky in the face with my chainsaw. I’d also like to punch anyone related to Penn State’s football program, excluding the players, right in the fucking face with a rabid Tasmanian Devil. Then I’d cornhole each and every one of those fuckers. In fact, I’d ALMOST be willing to fuck a syphilitic prostitute from Vienna just to contract syphilis that I could then infect those assholes with. Merry Christmas![/quote]
[quote]Sweet Revenge wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
Well, I assumed by now it would have been said but it hasn’t. So I’ll say it. I’d love to punch Jerry Sandusky in the face with my chainsaw. I’d also like to punch anyone related to Penn State’s football program, excluding the players, right in the fucking face with a rabid Tasmanian Devil. Then I’d cornhole each and every one of those fuckers. In fact, I’d ALMOST be willing to fuck a syphilitic prostitute from Vienna just to contract syphilis that I could then infect those assholes with. Merry Christmas![/quote]
[/quote]
o
o
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]Edevus wrote:
[quote]shadylow wrote:
This is the reason I am against it. Not because the parents are gay.[/quote]
So you are feeding the same reason that makes you be against it.
Priceless.
[/quote]
Yes, let’s save the poor child from being ridiculed by not having any!
What about children from mixed marriages?
What about children with birth defects?
Life is tough, period. What a better way to have kids learn about tolerance.
My most punchable face(s)? Lil’ Wayne - Duck-Lipped Bitches - HoustonGuy[/quote]Awww, are we out of love?
Or do you just like to take a shot at perfection?
“G-G-G-G-GGGGG!! Ha ha maybe I can get you gentleman something to nibble on, how about some pizza shooters, shrimp cocktails or extreme fajitas???”