Great point.
Normal men don’t even respect such men. It’s a human thing.
3 Likes
Distrust of some of the most obviously slimy individuals would seem to be a protective mechanism.
1 Like
We distrust them so much we elect them to political offices.
2 Likes
Well, they’re the only options 99% of the time.
I don’t see what a Matriarchy has over a Patriarchy… Humans are involved either way and humans make mistakes and as we see by current leadership, can be pathologically stupid.
That poor simp was just trying to get a foursome going, but he was such a pussy, they weren’t about to give them theirs. Props for trying though, I guess.
Some women are certainly smart and qualified to lead nations. But it’s not as simple as that and we all know it. This is all about critical gender theory, marxist ideology,3rd generational feminism, and plain old stupid.
If we are going for equity, I want to see equal representation in sanitation, construction, landscaping, and any other extremely laborious, hard labor job that men are expected to do, with equal results. If they can do that, then maybe I’ll be convinced they should be just handed the keys to the castle in every respect.
Too many modern women mostly want to glide through life and have everything given to them. They want play for 20 years of ‘hot girl summer’ and a couple hundred dicks and regret. Then they come in at 39 a fat, baby mama, wanting a man to take care of them…
When I think of modern women, I think of that Blu Ivey idiot, who through no deliberate action of my own, had the misfortune to hear about…
But I am not bitter… I am just an optimist.
2 Likes
For that to be fair, then we also need to see proportionate numbers of men in housecleaning, babysitting, public education, nursing, secretarial work, and a proportionate number of the guys filling these roles also need to balance childcare with their work instead of just leaving it to their significant other - assuming they have one. Sounds like a fun experiment - I’m sure men all over the world will be eager to prove their worth in those capacities.
Edit: this still has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that it’s stupid to mine one half of the population more heavily for characteristics that are normally distributed across the entire population.
1 Like
Wait, you only just noticed?
In case anyone didn’t know, pat’s an incel.
1 Like
I personally won’t be happy until men account for 50% of people giving birth. 
Dat’s tru =
Trans men don’t count, either.
Are you referring to the 9 year old child?
Pat hates kids as much as he hates women.
1 Like
I had to google her, and all I can say is…wow.
Like, I’m stretching as far as I can to see the connection between Jay-Z’s and Beyonce’s show-biz kid and…modern women.
You have a hard time pulling quality women, huh? Which is too bad. An easy solution would be to say, when you meet a woman who is 38 and appears to have some extra weight, “No thank you, I don’t want to have a relationship with you.” Or, alternatively, if that’s the best you can do and you crave companionship, “Oh, the condom? Yeah, I don’t have sex without it. Just my philosophy. No matter how much you might beg to go raw dog, the answer is simply no.”
Should the keys to the castle be handed to the nursing home aids, who lift and turn and feed and toilet and change diapers? Maybe, maybe. They could use a vacation in the affluence castle, as could the sanitation workers. But that’s really not how it works, is it? Happily for the guys working in the
fields, they make significantly (SIGNIFICANTLY) more than the women wiping asses and doing construction clean-ups (disgusting, filthy work). But again, we don’t give “the keys to the castle” to any of these people. We give them to people who work hard and go to college or create something cool and figure out how to market it, even if it’s largely a look or personality (e.g. Jay-J and Beyonce) (not to take anything way from their hard work and talent).
2 Likes
You needed to phrase that as a question?
Yes. He could have grown up as the child of an unfortunate union, could live in a neighborhood of high-drama, low-fidelity people (there are many such, generally correlated with low income), could have fucked a lot of low-quality promiscuous girls as a young man and watched them mature into low-quality women (however failing to notice that he was on the same exact course), etc.
All sorts of influences possible.
Occam’s razor: he’s just an idiot.
2 Likes
Of possible interest for some in the discussion.
“Conclusions: The results indicated that the reason why females performed not so well in large-scale spatial ability was that they were more susceptible to emotions and their parahippocampal gyrus worked less efficiently than males; females performed not so well in small-scale spatial ability because they mostly adopted the egocentric strategy and their sub-gyral also worked less efficiently than males. The two different reasons have made for gender differences in favor of males in terms of spatial ability and such gender differences have different manifestations in large-scale and small-scale spatial ability. Possible implications of the results for understanding the issue of gender differences in spatial ability are discussed.“
2 Likes
Or you’re just a lazy psychoanalyst
Hanlon’s razor: don’t attribute to malice what can be attributed to ignorance
2 Likes
You’re half right.
1 Like
Anecdotally I would even agree with some of what’s in the study. But we’re talking about women in high positions here. They are outliers, just like men in such positions are.