[quote]roybot wrote:
Last night, I made two of the biggest mistakes of my life: the first was renting Rottweiler; the second was watching it to the bitter end. The publicity blurb pitched it as “the story of a dog who was beaten severely at a young age and has surgery, in which it’s bones are replaced with metallic bones.”, I thought it would be a sort of old-school revenge thriller with a cybernetically enhanced pooch as the ‘hero’. Sounded interesting at the time. I was wrong.
Turns out that the dog was the villain, was not seeking revenge as it hadn’t been beaten at a young age and had no redeeming qualities whatsoever, even thought the director (Brian Yuzna, who should know better) tried to even the playing field by casting a guy so devoid of screen presence that the camera closed in on his ass more than his face.
Basically, take Terminator, throw in a dog and take out all the good bits. The only plus I can think of is that this cinematic stink bomb marks the screen debut of a bona-fide star in the making. The future of acting is here, and it’s chicken-shaped. In one small cameo, this feathered phenomenon demonstrates more emotional range than Channing Tatum has managed in his entire career to date. Prepare yourselves for the best breakthrough performance since Sharlto Copely in District 9:
That clip pretty much is the highlight of the movie.[/quote]
Hahaha, you are so right about that one.
