I do believe Blade 2 is the best in the series.
It sucks they fucked it up in the third one…and now we may never see another decent Blade movie.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
I do believe Blade 2 is the best in the series.
It sucks they fucked it up in the third one…and now we may never see another decent Blade movie.[/quote]
I disagree was the best. I give Blade a 9.5 out of 10. I give Blade 2 a 9.3 out of 10.
Blade 3? 7 out of 10.
Blade 1= awesome
Blade 2= equally awesome
Blade 3= the most over-acted under thought piece o’ BS I’ve ever had the misfortune to see ruin a cool series.
Anyways, saw Inglorious Basterds for the third time last night as my brother still hadn’t seen it. It’s still as awesome to me now as it was when I first saw it.
I liked the first Blade the most, but I think the 2nd was good too.
Death Race - fast paced action, while it struggles too much to give off this tough vibe. Good movie overall though, I recommend this. Whoever decided to use Terminal Island is one sick bastard.
I thought blade 3 was awesome up until like the last 1/3rd, then it just got dumb. Blade 1 and 2 are epic though I’m pretty sure I’ve seen both of those at least a dozen times. Blade 1 & 2, Constantine, and brotherhood of the wolf are the movies I will always watch when I have nothing better to do.
[quote]waylanderxx wrote:
I thought blade 3 was awesome up until like the last 1/3rd, then it just got dumb. Blade 1 and 2 are epic though I’m pretty sure I’ve seen both of those at least a dozen times. Blade 1 & 2, Constantine, and brotherhood of the wolf are the movies I will always watch when I have nothing better to do.[/quote]
Constantine was the shit…perfect role for Keanu’s monotone ass.
That guy from Prison Break, who played the bad vampire in Blade 3 was weak.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
That guy from Prison Break, who played the bad vampire in Blade 3 was weak. [/quote]
Agreed. For the father of all vampires, he was weaker than the head Vamp in Blade 2.
I think they fucked up by trying to make spin off characters out of Biel and what’s his name.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
MaximusB wrote:
That guy from Prison Break, who played the bad vampire in Blade 3 was weak.
Agreed. For the father of all vampires, he was weaker than the head Vamp in Blade 2.
I think they fucked up by trying to make spin off characters out of Biel and what’s his name.[/quote]
The addition of Ryan Reynold’s and his redshirts sucked. The mis-use of Triple H sucked. And the use of Dracula sucked. Wesley was perfect, he was just surrounded by Garbage.
Crank 2: High Voltage - not as good as the original. Too much camera “work” and showed more T&A to try to fluff out a longer movie than needed. Amy Smart is getting older but is still hot.
Rumor Has It - This is one of the reason I preferred Rachel among the Friends cast. Jennifer Aniston was good and very attractive. It was fun having “The Graduate” movie intertwined in this plot. Mena Suvari does NOT look as good as she normally does as a airhead blond.
I hate when Hollywood does this shit, you have a great idea for a movie and just blow it. I thought they did this with Wolverine, they really could have opened up the story, but limited it to something simple.
I love vampire and zombie movies, thank God they adapted many of the zombie movies to where they actually move fast. Shit, I saw one of the Night of the Living Dead movies, I have seen molasses drip out of a tree faster than how they move.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
I hate when Hollywood does this shit, you have a great idea for a movie and just blow it. I thought they did this with Wolverine, they really could have opened up the story, but limited it to something simple.
I love vampire and zombie movies, thank God they adapted many of the zombie movies to where they actually move fast. Shit, I saw one of the Night of the Living Dead movies, I have seen molasses drip out of a tree faster than how they move. [/quote]
I can’t believe that used to scare people. I saw the original Dawn of the Dead and nearly fell asleep. Slow moving zombies suck ass. All you would need is a motion detector and about 20 good minutes to walk slowly to the window to shoot them.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
MaximusB wrote:
I hate when Hollywood does this shit, you have a great idea for a movie and just blow it. I thought they did this with Wolverine, they really could have opened up the story, but limited it to something simple.
I love vampire and zombie movies, thank God they adapted many of the zombie movies to where they actually move fast. Shit, I saw one of the Night of the Living Dead movies, I have seen molasses drip out of a tree faster than how they move.
I can’t believe that used to scare people. I saw the original Dawn of the Dead and nearly fell asleep. Slow moving zombies suck ass. All you would need is a motion detector and about 20 good minutes to walk slowly to the window to shoot them.[/quote]
I disagree! I dislike the running concept. No need for a Zombie debate, I just don’t like it.
The worst part of the slow moving zombies/monsters is they always have that stupid “tripping” scene. The victim starts running and trips on God knows what and it takes them like 45 seconds to get back on their feet and they get eaten before they can get up.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
I hate when Hollywood does this shit, you have a great idea for a movie and just blow it. I thought they did this with Wolverine, they really could have opened up the story, but limited it to something simple. [/quote]
Really if you are thinking about the average viewer of the movie they would have gotten bored and lost with the story. They need a balance with action and story. To much action don’t know what the hell is going on, to much story gets to boring and slow.
To someone who is really into Wolverine and his story would have most likely not minded a longer accurate story line.
[quote]WolBarret wrote:
Professor X wrote:
MaximusB wrote:
I hate when Hollywood does this shit, you have a great idea for a movie and just blow it. I thought they did this with Wolverine, they really could have opened up the story, but limited it to something simple.
I love vampire and zombie movies, thank God they adapted many of the zombie movies to where they actually move fast. Shit, I saw one of the Night of the Living Dead movies, I have seen molasses drip out of a tree faster than how they move.
I can’t believe that used to scare people. I saw the original Dawn of the Dead and nearly fell asleep. Slow moving zombies suck ass. All you would need is a motion detector and about 20 good minutes to walk slowly to the window to shoot them.
I disagree! I dislike the running concept. No need for a Zombie debate, I just don’t like it.[/quote]
It pisses me off in those movies that some how people get bit by a slow moving zombie. All you have to do is walk at a moderate pace to out “run” them. Booooorrriinnnggg.
[quote]Fuzzyapple wrote:
WolBarret wrote:
Professor X wrote:
MaximusB wrote:
I hate when Hollywood does this shit, you have a great idea for a movie and just blow it. I thought they did this with Wolverine, they really could have opened up the story, but limited it to something simple.
I love vampire and zombie movies, thank God they adapted many of the zombie movies to where they actually move fast. Shit, I saw one of the Night of the Living Dead movies, I have seen molasses drip out of a tree faster than how they move.
I can’t believe that used to scare people. I saw the original Dawn of the Dead and nearly fell asleep. Slow moving zombies suck ass. All you would need is a motion detector and about 20 good minutes to walk slowly to the window to shoot them.
I disagree! I dislike the running concept. No need for a Zombie debate, I just don’t like it.
It pisses me off in those movies that some how people get bit by a slow moving zombie. All you have to do is walk at a moderate pace to out “run” them. Booooorrriinnnggg.
[/quote]
Its not supposed to be just one zombie, but an onslaught of zombies. They never sleep and they never stop. And you will eventually run out of ammo.
I saw Jennifer’s Body. The makeout scene is sweet but short. Other than that the movie sucks but in an awesome/hilarious kind of way.
And be prepared to learn many new slang terms…
[quote]WolBarret wrote:
Its not supposed to be just one zombie, but an onslaught of zombies. They never sleep and they never stop. And you will eventually run out of ammo.[/quote]
Then when that happens just start moaning and groaning and walking around like a zombie and you should not be eaten. Only if only…
But yes seeing a freakish amount of slow moving zombies come at you would cause me to shit myself. All this talk about zombies make me want to play L4D and I haven’t for like 3 months.
[quote]Fuzzyapple wrote:
WolBarret wrote:
Its not supposed to be just one zombie, but an onslaught of zombies. They never sleep and they never stop. And you will eventually run out of ammo.
Then when that happens just start moaning and groaning and walking around like a zombie and you should not be eaten. Only if only…
But yes seeing a freakish amount of slow moving zombies come at you would cause me to shit myself. All this talk about zombies make me want to play L4D and I haven’t for like 3 months.
[/quote]
Left 4 Dead is a great game. Wish they would add new maps.