Monster Found?

[quote]Blaze_108 wrote:
shizen wrote:
its like no one has ever seen a turtle without a shell before.

that’s what i thought as well. It’s curious and highly unlikely that there wouldn’t be tears of some sort on the back of the spine area, however, seeing as the shell is an integral part of the turtle’s spine.[/quote]

This makes sense, as well.

I honestly have no fucking idea what a turtle looks like without it’s shell - I’ve seen only a handful of the bastards in my life and have never given them much of a second look.

The paws don’t look like what I would imagine a turtle’s too, either…not too efficient for traveling through the ocean.

[quote]zephead4747 wrote:
Well, looks liek someone tried to grill it. If it doesn’t taste good, why do I care?[/quote]

I agree - can we mince it? grill it? bake it or put it on a hamburger bun?
If not - feed it to the dogs

[quote]anonym wrote:
.not too efficient for traveling through the ocean.[/quote]

You can see webbing between the toes in the front. a lot of sea turles have fins w/o toes, didn’t know there were some with toes.

It’s a drowned dog. I found one once when I was a kid. It was bloated up and purple like that, and all of its hair was missing. The one in the photograph has a funny looking jaw because part of it was eaten away by crabs.

"Meanwhile, Newsday petitioned William Wise, director of Stony Brook University’s Living Marine Resources Institute, to take a look and comment on the photo. While he couldn’t say what it is, he knows what it’s not:

A raccoon. (“The legs appear to be too long in proportion to the body.”)

A sea turtle. (“Sea turtles do not have teeth.”)

A rodent. (“Rodents have two huge, curved incisor teeth in front of their mouths.”)

He said the general body shape looks like a dog or other canine (“Coyote?”). But that the “prominent eye ridge and the feet” don’t match.

He said the feet and face look “somewhat ovine” - that would be like a sheep - but sheep don’t have sharp teeth.

Wise’s best estimation: “A talented someone who got very creative with latex.”

apparently its some sort of viral campaign

[quote]shizen wrote:
Its like no one has ever seen a turtle without a shell before. [/quote]

A turtle’s shell extends from the ribs and spine.

It looks like an otter.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Kalan's_skeleton.jpg

but it could be a number of different animals. Some of its face was eaten/rotted away, but it’s very typical for a mammalian skeleton.

Tissue analysis time.

Turtles are connected to their shell, their shell is actually part of their bone structure, this thing clearly appears to have a skin or atleast a fleshy casing, turtles aren’t fleshy on their limbs or neck their rough and scaley, and their interals covered by shell aren’t incased in a flesh.

Dogs don’t have rodent teeth or a beak.

The biggest reason it looks fake is that mixed up limbs, the front quarter has some kind of fused paw. A usefull thing if the animal is water dwelling, but the rear paws are not hydrodynamic at all. For the front quarter to be usefull as the sole means to get the thing through water its elbow would be fused and it wouldn’t have such a FAT ASS!!.

Whoever said it was a dog, you win. looks much more like a dog from this new angle.

[quote]Der Candy wrote:
"Meanwhile, Newsday petitioned William Wise, director of Stony Brook University’s Living Marine Resources Institute, to take a look and comment on the photo. While he couldn’t say what it is, he knows what it’s not:

A raccoon. (“The legs appear to be too long in proportion to the body.”)

A sea turtle. (“Sea turtles do not have teeth.”)

A rodent. (“Rodents have two huge, curved incisor teeth in front of their mouths.”)

He said the general body shape looks like a dog or other canine (“Coyote?”). But that the “prominent eye ridge and the feet” don’t match.

He said the feet and face look “somewhat ovine” - that would be like a sheep - but sheep don’t have sharp teeth.

Wise’s best estimation: “A talented someone who got very creative with latex.”

[/quote]

damn. it looked like a raccoon to me.

[quote]Uncle Gabby wrote:
It’s a drowned dog. I found one once when I was a kid. It was bloated up and purple like that, and all of its hair was missing. The one in the photograph has a funny looking jaw because part of it was eaten away by crabs.[/quote]

This is by far the most plausible explanation.

Monster…haaaaahhh…i swear, some people will buy anything. I bet the same guys also think bruce lee was challeneged and killed by aliens.

[quote]King Bling wrote:
I bet the same guys also think bruce lee was challeneged and killed by aliens. [/quote]

Actually, he was challenged and killed by Professor X. I thought everyone knew that?

[quote]Psydone wrote:
Turtles are connected to their shell, their shell is actually part of their bone structure, this thing clearly appears to have a skin or atleast a fleshy casing, turtles aren’t fleshy on their limbs or neck their rough and scaley, and their interals covered by shell aren’t incased in a flesh.
[/quote]

Dude, quit lying to us. Franklin takes his shell off regularly.

And in case anyone was wondering what that thing really is - I have at least 3 dozen or so of them in the hidden room off my basement. It’s called a Canitortswine. It’s a hybrid between a Rottweiler, snapping turtle and pot-bellied pig. It’s an excellent food source for Minotaurs (which is why I have so many of them).

DB

why would it be hairless if it was a dog?

I still does not explain the weird looking front toes and the eagles beak it has. It also only has like 5 teeth and no canines.

[quote]xXSeraphimXx wrote:
why would it be hairless if it was a dog?

I still does not explain the weird looking front toes and the eagles beak it has. It also only has like 5 teeth and no canines.[/quote]

Loss of hair is usually caused by sickness… like mange.

It doesn’t have a beak. That’s part of it’s skull/top jaw that’s visible… part of it’s face got eaten away… and the teeth probably fell out.

I thought you guys meant hairloss due to bloating or something. I have seen mange on a dogs and the skin looks nothing like this, it usually still has small hairs and a rough texture. This shit looks like a baby rats skin.

here’s another one…

It looks like the people at my gym who walk on the treadmill and watch “Oprah”, then hit the vending machines for a Snickers bar on the way out.

[quote]BruceLeeFan wrote:
here’s another one…

[/quote]

That looks like a decomposed cetacean to me. Decomposed collagen might give the illusion of hairs.