His other views aside, it seems like he’s trying to ingratiate himself to a new crowd. Starting with a strong rebuke of his own previous behavior, then he sort of meanders from vague point to vague point, and doesn’t seem to have a real grasp of this specific application of these concepts.
1 Like
Leave it to @EmilyQ to be stupid as fuck.
The topic title says “Molyneux on Incels” which is clearly what @BrickHead first post is all about. Not “Molyneux and his various views”
Do you simply talk like an incel, or are you one?
Your words tell us far more about you than they do the subject of your scorn.
2 Likes
I’ve kinda lost patience with her bullshit. she does it on purpose I think. she can see the fucking post title, she can see the OP and yet chooses to be dumb.
blame her, not me.
Sure thing.
Hey. @EmilyQ Fuck you! You’re always starting up with your womanly bullshit, after all. I don’t particularly like it when my ideas about the world are challenged, so go churn some butter or something. Show me some ankle while you do it, too.
6 Likes
that’s the spirit !
1 Like
Molyneux’s views are all related. His views on incels come from the same place as his belief in white supremacy.
1 Like
It was bricks’ constant defense of you and explaining away your idiocy and lies that initiated my strong feelings towards him. I take the blame if this turns into a flamefest, so I’m sorry. But people will find you calling Emily stupid as fuck more offensive than you saying vicious racism and hate speech is “a bit nutty”, and I disagree - calling Emily stupid is hilarious, she’s smarter than most of the posters on here and most of us know that.
He’s like one, only a little bulkier, with more muscle mass.
4 Likes
Hello this is twojarslave. I use the pronouns he/him.
I’m just here to apologize for my poor choice of words. @EmilyQ is a forum treasure. I never should have told her “Fuck you”, nor was it my place to give her career advice. I now understand why my choice of words was poor, even if in jest.
Please, let us return to the topic at hand: Molyneux on Incels.
2 Likes
Good, take the blame. I know I can be abrasive but you’ll get used to it eventually. No one should actually take offense.
Anyyyywayyyysss
I’m listening to his tangent… he’s not wrong about most of it. I’m not done yet but I’m not sure what anyone disagrees with here? Can you specify something?
one thing I’d like to point out, and I’m not sure he mentions or not since I’m not done but I do believe most women end up settling eventually. it’s becoming less common, but women do ‘settle’. Men are settling more than women these days though, for sure on the looks department.
His point that women will eventually find this whole thing disastrous is so true. I do feel in the end they’ll screw themselves. I’ve never seen one single friend of mine, female, that has slept around and ended up happy. They all end up miserable. Feminists lied to them.
EDIT: ok I finished the entire thing. he doesn’t say anything controversial here. Is that why you @flappinit decided to try and make the thread more exciting? or are you a stringent supporter of the ideology of feminism and got mad? now I’m confused.
1 Like
K.
-
He defines patriarchy as “a few men” ruling society and uses that as his reasoning why hypergamy, which favors those few good looking and successful men, will actually bring about the patriarchy that feminists abhor. Patriarchy means a society where men benefit, and women are largely excluded. There’s no mention of a few men ruling society. It’s just men. And if women lose the right to choose the men they want, men rule society.
-
Women don’t sleep with men in the hopes that the release of oxytocin will trick men into permanent relationships. I laughed out loud at that. I mean, I’m sure some women out there are that crazy. But some women gasp just like sex.
-
He loops in feminism with a welfare state. What?
There are just so many more.
And yes, silly man, I’m a feminist. I posted about this in another thread. I believe the genders are equal. I believe “feminists” who think women should be above men are not feminists. I believe people who promote scientific racism aren’t being “a bit nutty”, they’re monsters. And like many successful monsters, this one is charismatic and well spoken.
2 Likes
-
there’s various definitions of patriarchy. in some societies it’s the eldest that rule, others it’s just men in general, and in others its only a select few based on whatever chosen trait that is most valuable. I’m no anthropologist but that is my understanding of “patriarchy”
-
Um, on the most primal level I’m pretty sure that is one of the functions. Again, I’m no evolutionary biologist but I have heard biologist say this very thing.
-
Yeah well that’s him being him and he draws these connections, which is not totally unfounded. In some places welfare states were put in place because of fatherless children, single moms, etc. Do you think it is a far stretch to maybe conclude that the reason so many scandanivian women are so freely sexual is because the welfare system is so supportive? Just a thought. Not saying the is the reason.
Men and women aren’t equal though. Should they have equal rights? Absolutely. Feminism as an ideology Is terrible. My opinion.
Scientific racism… It seems like people are ok when it comes to genetic superiority for physical attributes in sports, but not in brain function. That’s all I’ll say on that.
I don’t believe there is such a thing as an incel. I mean, those who are called incels are real but it’s just another word for little douchebags that makes little douchebags feel like victims and justifies their douchebaggery. They completely lack the ability to laugh at themselves.
One of the most basic functions of human beings is to procreate, or at least engage in the action of procreating without actually doing so.
It Is funny to laugh about it if you actually get the opportunity for human interaction on a physical level but for anyone that actually can’t, my god that must be fucking horrendous and no laughing matter.
Thank for this post. It tells me that you are too uneducated for me to waste my time talking to you. You have no idea what the words you use even mean.
didn’t someone say to you that reading your posts made them take arimidex?
seriously, my estrogen levels go up every time you type.
1 Like
Ladies and gentlemen, a glimpse into the true soul of this man.
Jesus Christ, dude. I’m angry at myself for not expecting this from you.
2 Likes
So you believe two smart parents don’t breed smart children? Two athletic parents don’t breed athletic children? Or at least a child that has the precursors to be better suited for some tasks?
1 Like
Welfare means a women does not have to rely on a man to support her children. It means a woman can have a child without a husband. Or it allows a woman to end a marriage for whatever reason she wants. Before State welfare rightly or wrongly woman had to rely on partnership with a reliable man to help raise and provide for their children.
The idea of welfare is good, helping people that need financial help, or allowing women to escape a physically abusive relationship.
Ideally welfare acts as a safety net, to help people get back on their own feet to be able to support themselves. In many instances it also has led to a situation not as a safety net, but as a way of life. Especially in the black community, where male children don’t have a positive adult male role model in their lives. This has been postulated as one of the major reasons why young black men are dramatically overrepresented in crime statistics in the USA.