MLB Playoff Thread 2009

Just from a hitting perspective:

C- Posada > Ruiz
1B- Texiera = Howard
2B- Cano < Utley
3B- Rodriguez >> Feliz
SS- Jeter >> Rollins
LF- Damon = Ibanez
CF- Cabrera/Gardner < Victorino
RF- Swisher < Werth

Yankees have better lineup but the Phillies are a better fielding team, making, in my opinion, the position players pretty equal with a slight edge to the Yankees.

Lee/Hamels/Blanton is essentially a wash to Sabathia/Burnett/Petitte to me. Happ or Pedro is probably a better option than whoever the Yankees throw as their 4th starter. So starting pitching slightly to the Phillies but the Yankees bullpen is obviously better.

Two fairly evenly matched teams, with the Yankees having a slight edge but it should be a very interesting series to say the least.

[quote]pat wrote:
Congrats Phils fans…That was just ownership the Dodgers.
Anybody notice the bone head behind the plate missed tons of pitches? I like that “Pitch Trax” thing on TBS. Lot’s of strikes called balls last night, it was ridiculous.[/quote]

That pitch track thing sucks balls, though. It doesn’t adjust for each hitter (height, etc.), it just stays in the same place all the time. I don’t put much faith in it at all. Many pitches that were below the knee on taller batters have been within the pitch track box as a strike.

[quote]jtrinsey wrote:
Just from a hitting perspective:

C- Posada > Ruiz
1B- Texiera = Howard
2B- Cano < Utley
3B- Rodriguez >> Feliz
SS- Jeter >> Rollins
LF- Damon = Ibanez
CF- Cabrera/Gardner < Victorino
RF- Swisher < Werth

Yankees have better lineup but the Phillies are a better fielding team, making, in my opinion, the position players pretty equal with a slight edge to the Yankees.

Lee/Hamels/Blanton is essentially a wash to Sabathia/Burnett/Petitte to me. Happ or Pedro is probably a better option than whoever the Yankees throw as their 4th starter. So starting pitching slightly to the Phillies but the Yankees bullpen is obviously better.

Two fairly evenly matched teams, with the Yankees having a slight edge but it should be a very interesting series to say the least.[/quote]

Not a bad analysis, but Howard is better than Tex, and I’d go with Lee, Hamels, Pedro as a better starting lineup than the yanks, with the yanks having the better bullpen.

But yeah, two very evenly matched teams. It’s going to be close, maybe even 8 games because 7 just won’t be enough.

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
pat wrote:
Congrats Phils fans…That was just ownership the Dodgers.
Anybody notice the bone head behind the plate missed tons of pitches? I like that “Pitch Trax” thing on TBS. Lot’s of strikes called balls last night, it was ridiculous.

That pitch track thing sucks balls, though. It doesn’t adjust for each hitter (height, etc.), it just stays in the same place all the time. I don’t put much faith in it at all. Many pitches that were below the knee on taller batters have been within the pitch track box as a strike. [/quote]

Exactly. That is one of the worst ‘post season attention getters’ ever. Thank goodness fox doesn’t have it. It’s only good for calls on the inside and outside of the plate but it still doesn’t account for the depth of the strike zone. The strike zone is three dimensional.

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
jtrinsey wrote:
Just from a hitting perspective:

C- Posada > Ruiz
1B- Texiera = Howard
2B- Cano < Utley
3B- Rodriguez >> Feliz
SS- Jeter >> Rollins
LF- Damon = Ibanez
CF- Cabrera/Gardner < Victorino
RF- Swisher < Werth

Yankees have better lineup but the Phillies are a better fielding team, making, in my opinion, the position players pretty equal with a slight edge to the Yankees.

Lee/Hamels/Blanton is essentially a wash to Sabathia/Burnett/Petitte to me. Happ or Pedro is probably a better option than whoever the Yankees throw as their 4th starter. So starting pitching slightly to the Phillies but the Yankees bullpen is obviously better.

Two fairly evenly matched teams, with the Yankees having a slight edge but it should be a very interesting series to say the least.

Not a bad analysis, but Howard is better than Tex, and I’d go with Lee, Hamels, Pedro as a better starting lineup than the yanks, with the yanks having the better bullpen.

But yeah, two very evenly matched teams. It’s going to be close, maybe even 8 games because 7 just won’t be enough.[/quote]

I think you need to wait and see what Burnett does tonight before you can say Hamels is better. If Manuel is going to yank Hamels that quick against the dodgers what do you predict will happen agains the Yanks?

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
If Manuel is going to yank Hamels that quick against the dodgers what do you predict will happen agains the Yanks? [/quote]

The main worry with Burnett is that he walks a lot of batters (over 4 per 9 IP this year) and the Phillies have shown that walking a few guys in front of Utley/Howard/Werth can spell disaster. Burnett does not have a great fastball, but his curveball can be deadly. Howard, Victorino, Feliz and Rollins can be neutralized by a strong curveball, so if Burnett can command his offspeed stuff, he could shut down the Phillies. However, if his control gets shaky and he is forced into 2-0 and 3-1 counts where he has to throw a mediocre fastball against those guys who want to look dead red, then it will be trouble for the Yankees.

On the other hand, the Yankees drew more walks than any other team in baseball this year, so they obviously have a very patient lineup. However, one thing Hamels usually does well is throw strikes, with just a hair over 2 walks per 9 IP the past three years. I am worried about him though. It is no secret that Hamels loves to throw his devastating changeup, but the Yankees are loaded with guys like Jeter, Texiera, Damon and Rodriguez who historically have hit changeups very well.

I don’t think Hamels is any better than Burnett, I just think Lee and Pedro and better than Sabathia and Pettite. Obviously whoever shows up ready to play is going to be in a better position but I have confidence in Lee and Pedro, and honestly, more confidence in Blanton than Hamels at this point.

[quote]jtrinsey wrote:
BONEZ217 wrote:
If Manuel is going to yank Hamels that quick against the dodgers what do you predict will happen agains the Yanks?

The main worry with Burnett is that he walks a lot of batters (over 4 per 9 IP this year) and the Phillies have shown that walking a few guys in front of Utley/Howard/Werth can spell disaster. Burnett does not have a great fastball, but his curveball can be deadly. Howard, Victorino, Feliz and Rollins can be neutralized by a strong curveball, so if Burnett can command his offspeed stuff, he could shut down the Phillies. However, if his control gets shaky and he is forced into 2-0 and 3-1 counts where he has to throw a mediocre fastball against those guys who want to look dead red, then it will be trouble for the Yankees.

On the other hand, the Yankees drew more walks than any other team in baseball this year, so they obviously have a very patient lineup. However, one thing Hamels usually does well is throw strikes, with just a hair over 2 walks per 9 IP the past three years. I am worried about him though. It is no secret that Hamels loves to throw his devastating changeup, but the Yankees are loaded with guys like Jeter, Texiera, Damon and Rodriguez who historically have hit changeups very well.[/quote]

Do you watch baseball?

If Burnett doesn’t have a great fastball then who does? Felix Hernandez, Lincecum, Verlander, Lester? Burnetts 4 seem tops at 96 and 2 seem tops at 93. They both move. And both miss a ton of bats. Unless you define ‘great’ as ‘top 5 in the league only’ you are simply wrong.

Hamels isn’t in the same category as Burnett this postseason. Hamels is tired. He throws too many fat strikes. Burnett has already showed he has the head to pitch in the playoffs and has the best ‘stuff’ out of anyone left. He’s going to throw a wild pitch at a bad time, fine.

Guys like you who bank their arguments on situational numbers always come up short in postseason predictions. I bet you predicted that the dodgers pen would have out performed the phillies pen, right? Just look at the swings the Dodgers (not a particularly powerful lineup) took against Hamels. Then look at the swings that the Angels (a lineup with average American league power) took against Burnett. The numbers dont say anything about bloop hits and broken bat singles.

And if you want to talk numbers you cant leave out that Hamels’s changeup isn’t nearly as effective against lefties and that the lefties in the Yanks lineup actually hit left side pitching well.

Is this really even being discussed?

http://www.nypost.com/r/nypost/2009/10/21/news/media/lettermistresstowifea.pdf

This isn’t about the playoffs, but did you guys see this story about Steve Phillips and his misstress? The misstress wrote this letter to his wife.

Chicks are crazy.

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
http://www.nypost.com/r/nypost/2009/10/21/news/media/lettermistresstowifea.pdf

This isn’t about the playoffs, but did you guys see this story about Steve Phillips and his misstress? The misstress wrote this letter to his wife.

Chicks are crazy.[/quote]

“Buzz your girlfriend, WOOF”

AMIRITE GUYS??

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
http://www.nypost.com/r/nypost/2009/10/21/news/media/lettermistresstowifea.pdf

This isn’t about the playoffs, but did you guys see this story about Steve Phillips and his misstress? The misstress wrote this letter to his wife.

Chicks are crazy.[/quote]

Can you imagine having your marriage and possibly your career ruined for that?

This chick makes us run-of-the-mill crazy chicks look bad. She created a fake facebook account and started cyber-stalking Phillips’ 16 year old son. She said she was a school mate and was concerned about his parents’ marriage. Really fucking creepy stuff.

On the bright side, there is now a position open for an assistant at ESPN. Better get a resume over there ASAP.

Burnett throws hard (but so does Vicente Padilla and we see how that worked out for him) but his fastball gets hit. Interestingly enough, there are people who actually track this stuff. You simply take every pitch, record the pitch type, velocity and location, and then the result of the pitch. Strikes and outs are good, balls aren’t good, walks and singles are bad and extra base hits are very bad.

The top 15 fastballs in the league this year were:
Carpenter, Kershaw, Wolf, Lilly, Cain, Greinke, Pineiro, Josh Johnson, Baker, Verlander, Hernandez, Lee, Vazquez, Correia, Santana.

Some of those guys (Pineiro, Correia) are probably 1-year wonders, some (Kershaw, Johnson, Baker) are young guys who may or may not be able to sustain that success, but the majority of that list should be no surprise. Of course, that list is only for this year; if you looked at a 3-year average, you would see guys like Lincecum, Halladay, Zambrano, etc., who were just outside the top-15 this year rise up. If you added in cutters than guys like Lester would be on there as well.

Burnett has been a very similar pitcher for most of the last 5 years. His velocity is actually down a little bit from his peak with the Marlins and his fastball is less effective. His fastball is not terrible, but it’s only above-average at best. He relies more on the curveball now than before and that is the pitch he gets out with. His curveball is devastating and has been one of the best in the game for years. But, it’s a tough argument to say his fastball is even in the top 20 amongst starting pitchers. I guess you could make an argument that his fastball is what causes his curveball to be good and you can’t separate the two… but I would tend to disagree.

Burnett has indeed shown he has the head to pitch in the playoffs, but then again, Hamels was the MVP last year. However, I agree that he does look tired and I actually think he is very overrated. You could certainly argue that Burnett has the best “stuff” left, but he’s definitely not as good as CC or Lee as a total pitcher. But yeah, I think he’s a little better than Hamels.

I surely did think the Dodger’s bullpen would outperform the Phillies this postseason. Mostly because the Dodger’s pen was pretty much the best this season and the Phillies were among the worst. Usually, players who are good in the regular season are good in the post-season and those who are bad in the regular season are bad in the post-season. However, over only a few games, anything can happen. If you really thought the Phillies pen was better than the Dodgers, then you are either extremely lucky or smarter than almost everybody else who follows baseball.

I thought the last sentence of mine indicated that I was worried about Hamels. I actually think he’s a pretty terrible matchup against the Yankees.

We’ll see how the Minor League(NL) Phils do when they have to play a team from the Major League(AL).

I have no reason to beleive that the yankees, who won 10 more games in a much harder league and also in the hardest division are going to lose.

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
LankyMofo wrote:
http://www.nypost.com/r/nypost/2009/10/21/news/media/lettermistresstowifea.pdf

This isn’t about the playoffs, but did you guys see this story about Steve Phillips and his misstress? The misstress wrote this letter to his wife.

Chicks are crazy.

“Buzz your girlfriend, WOOF”

AMIRITE GUYS??[/quote]

LOLOL.

[quote]jtrinsey wrote:
Burnett throws hard (but so does Vicente Padilla and we see how that worked out for him) but his fastball gets hit. Interestingly enough, there are people who actually track this stuff. You simply take every pitch, record the pitch type, velocity and location, and then the result of the pitch. Strikes and outs are good, balls aren’t good, walks and singles are bad and extra base hits are very bad.

The top 15 fastballs in the league this year were:
Carpenter, Kershaw, Wolf, Lilly, Cain, Greinke, Pineiro, Josh Johnson, Baker, Verlander, Hernandez, Lee, Vazquez, Correia, Santana.

Some of those guys (Pineiro, Correia) are probably 1-year wonders, some (Kershaw, Johnson, Baker) are young guys who may or may not be able to sustain that success, but the majority of that list should be no surprise. Of course, that list is only for this year; if you looked at a 3-year average, you would see guys like Lincecum, Halladay, Zambrano, etc., who were just outside the top-15 this year rise up. If you added in cutters than guys like Lester would be on there as well.

Burnett has been a very similar pitcher for most of the last 5 years. His velocity is actually down a little bit from his peak with the Marlins and his fastball is less effective. His fastball is not terrible, but it’s only above-average at best. He relies more on the curveball now than before and that is the pitch he gets out with. His curveball is devastating and has been one of the best in the game for years. But, it’s a tough argument to say his fastball is even in the top 20 amongst starting pitchers. I guess you could make an argument that his fastball is what causes his curveball to be good and you can’t separate the two… but I would tend to disagree.

Burnett has indeed shown he has the head to pitch in the playoffs, but then again, Hamels was the MVP last year. However, I agree that he does look tired and I actually think he is very overrated. You could certainly argue that Burnett has the best “stuff” left, but he’s definitely not as good as CC or Lee as a total pitcher. But yeah, I think he’s a little better than Hamels.

I surely did think the Dodger’s bullpen would outperform the Phillies this postseason. Mostly because the Dodger’s pen was pretty much the best this season and the Phillies were among the worst. Usually, players who are good in the regular season are good in the post-season and those who are bad in the regular season are bad in the post-season. However, over only a few games, anything can happen. If you really thought the Phillies pen was better than the Dodgers, then you are either extremely lucky or smarter than almost everybody else who follows baseball.

I thought the last sentence of mine indicated that I was worried about Hamels. I actually think he’s a pretty terrible matchup against the Yankees. [/quote]

Padilla had 2 great starts in the post season and he got lit up against a great lineup in his last start. What’s your point? I’m fully aware that there’s more to pitching than the velocity of a fastball and the tilt of breaking pitches.

Burnett is not going to dominate a good lineup every time he pitches. He has the potential to though.

And as far as that graph goes. Baker and Wolf? Come on. Just because Burnett doesn’t use his fastball as his outpitch like many other power pitchers do doesn’t mean that most of the other guys on that list wouldnt trade their fastball for Burnett’s.

It’s not really a big deal. This is far too subjective for two people to agree. That graph does not present any sort of objectivity when you have like guys like Randy Wolf, Scott Baker and Ted Lilly making the ‘top 15 fastballs’ in baseball list.

Lee and Sabathia are much better than Burnett. No question about that. But this postseason (and for most of the second half of the regular season) Hamels has not come anywhere close to his “MVP” form. Sure, he has the potential to have a nice game against the Yankees (if they win) but if he is tired than this week coming up is not enough rest.

And no I didn’t think the Phillies had an edge over the Dogder’s pen, and I still don’t. On paper the Dodgers still have a top notch pen. On paper Burnett’s fastball may not be top 30.

And (not directed at you) I’m tired of hearing that Lidge and Mo are the only two not to blow a save. Lidge didn’t pitch in every save opportunity.

I am predicting now that Sabathia will hit a home run in the World Series, should they make it. :slight_smile:

[quote]Anonymity wrote:
We’ll see how the Minor League(NL) Phils do when they have to play a team from the Major League(AL).

I have no reason to beleive that the yankees, who won 10 more games in a much harder league and also in the hardest division are going to lose.[/quote]

Yanks score more runs, hit more hrs, etc. Had more wins blah blah blah.

Put this Phillies lineup in the AL with a DH that puts up 30hr, 100 rbi and you’d have the Yankees.

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
I don’t think Hamels is any better than Burnett, I just think Lee and Pedro and better than Sabathia and Pettite. Obviously whoever shows up ready to play is going to be in a better position but I have confidence in Lee and Pedro, and honestly, more confidence in Blanton than Hamels at this point.[/quote]

Lanky, I was telling my friends that Hamels should throw game 3. I think you want him to pitch in Philly and then pray that the series doesn’t go 7 games.

[quote]Anonymity wrote:
We’ll see how the Minor League(NL) Phils do when they have to play a team from the Major League(AL).

I have no reason to beleive that the yankees, who won 10 more games in a much harder league and also in the hardest division are going to lose.[/quote]

Lol this is dumb. The phillies have an ‘american league lineup’. And a comparable rotation. Which annoys me because I’m going to be out of the country for games 5 6 and 7 of the WS. I was hoping the dodgers would make it so there would be a CHANCE for a sweep.

come on yanks!! choke!! choke!! choke!!

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
Anonymity wrote:
We’ll see how the Minor League(NL) Phils do when they have to play a team from the Major League(AL).

I have no reason to beleive that the yankees, who won 10 more games in a much harder league and also in the hardest division are going to lose.

Lol this is dumb. The phillies have an ‘american league lineup’. And a comparable rotation. Which annoys me because I’m going to be out of the country for games 5 6 and 7 of the WS. I was hoping the dodgers would make it so there would be a CHANCE for a sweep. [/quote]

The fact is they won 10 less games in a league that most experts agree is, at the moment, inferior.

If you were to put the phillies ‘american league lineup’ and ‘comprable rotation’ in the AL for the entire year they would not stand out nearly as much as the yanks. They probably would have been in a tight race just to even make the playoffs at all.

They’re going to need pedro to put on a show because After Lee they are in big trouble.