Misconceptions of Christianity

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]IrishSteel wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

…again, and i stress, people killing people in the name of atheism. Give me examples? Not ideology, not stress related, not madness, but purely killings in the name of atheism…
[/quote]

aye - but see, you had to add all sorts of caveats to your request . . . when one does not have a religious ideology - it is replaced with another ideology . . . thus any ideology based on the absence of religion would qualify . . .

everyone killed in russia from 19-teens through 1990 . . . just a few . . .[/quote]

Stalin was in a seminary preparing to become a Priest before he became to all intents and purposes a God to his people so not sure where the atheism comes in on that example.[/quote]

Because he was an atheist.
[/quote]

No, he was the lead of a personality cult religion.

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

As I have stated elsewhere. The group of people who are being nice because they want to be nice and because they are focussed on this life really should be nicer than the group of people who are only being nice because they are told to by an unseen master so that they can get a reward in the next life.[/quote]

LOL. Is that what you think Christianity is? Really? [/quote]

At a very basic and ridiculously simplified level yes that is the case.[/quote]

Not even true “at a very basic and ridiculously simplified level.”

You probably know that. Or maybe you don’t. If case you don’t, by any chance have you ever heard of the term “invincible ignorance”?

[/quote]

At the most basic level the message of God is be nice to each other so that you get to sit by my side in heaven after you die.

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]IrishSteel wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

…again, and i stress, people killing people in the name of atheism. Give me examples? Not ideology, not stress related, not madness, but purely killings in the name of atheism…
[/quote]

aye - but see, you had to add all sorts of caveats to your request . . . when one does not have a religious ideology - it is replaced with another ideology . . . thus any ideology based on the absence of religion would qualify . . .

everyone killed in russia from 19-teens through 1990 . . . just a few . . .[/quote]

Stalin was in a seminary preparing to become a Priest before he became to all intents and purposes a God to his people so not sure where the atheism comes in on that example.[/quote]

Because he was an atheist.
[/quote]

No, he was the lead of a personality cult religion.[/quote]

And the pigs are now doing barrel rolls!

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]IrishSteel wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

…again, and i stress, people killing people in the name of atheism. Give me examples? Not ideology, not stress related, not madness, but purely killings in the name of atheism…
[/quote]

aye - but see, you had to add all sorts of caveats to your request . . . when one does not have a religious ideology - it is replaced with another ideology . . . thus any ideology based on the absence of religion would qualify . . .

everyone killed in russia from 19-teens through 1990 . . . just a few . . .[/quote]

Stalin was in a seminary preparing to become a Priest before he became to all intents and purposes a God to his people so not sure where the atheism comes in on that example.[/quote]

Because he was an atheist.
[/quote]

No, he was the lead of a personality cult religion.[/quote]

No, he was an atheist.

Let’s just summarize.

Atheists can’t kill/oppress in the name of atheism.

An atheist can’t be a despot.

Any other infallible doctrines from the One True-Atheist Faith?

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Let’s just summarize.

Atheists can’t kill/oppress in the name of atheism.

An atheist can’t be a despot.

Any other infallible doctrines from the One True-Atheist Faith?[/quote]

Atheists can kill in the name of atheism (they just don’t very often). Being an Atheist doesn’t stop you being a dick.

There have been Atheist Despots, Stalin is not a good example of one though. Loon bag despots are Loon bag despots not because they are religious or atheist but because they are loon bag despots.

Who excommunicates heretical atheists by the way? Is that something you and ephrem just up and decided to do? Just curious.

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]IrishSteel wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

…again, and i stress, people killing people in the name of atheism. Give me examples? Not ideology, not stress related, not madness, but purely killings in the name of atheism…
[/quote]

aye - but see, you had to add all sorts of caveats to your request . . . when one does not have a religious ideology - it is replaced with another ideology . . . thus any ideology based on the absence of religion would qualify . . .

everyone killed in russia from 19-teens through 1990 . . . just a few . . .[/quote]

Stalin was in a seminary preparing to become a Priest before he became to all intents and purposes a God to his people so not sure where the atheism comes in on that example.[/quote]

Because he was an atheist.
[/quote]

No, he was the lead of a personality cult religion.[/quote]

And the pigs are now doing barrel rolls![/quote]

Someone elses comments on this topic. More eloquent than me.

"It may surprise you to hear that my primary target isn’t religion, or even theism as such. Indeed, as I’ll explain later, there are some forms of religion (and even some rare forms of theism, specifically deism) with which I have very little problem at all.

"So, what is my problem? My problem is with dogma. With the belief that it is acceptable, even admirable, to believe propositions without good evidence or without good reasons for believing those propositions to be true.

The forms those dogmatically believed propositions can take are potentially infinite. One might dogmatically believe in the historical inevitability of a communist utopia, under which the State will wither away, after a brief but necessary period of a dictatorship of the proletariat. One might dogmatically believe in the existence of something called the Aryan race, in its inherent superiority to all other races, and in the inherent inferiority and perfidy of the Jewish race. One might dogmatically believe that the Creator of the universe called one’s religion to convert the world or take it by force through holy war, that death in the defence of (or attempt to reconquer) lands so acquired is the greatest of all actions, and that such martyrs will go to paradise after they die to be attended by 72 virgin brides and joined in due course be all their family and loved-ones. Or one might dogmatically believe that the creator of the universe condemns contraception as a mortal sin.

"What all four of these beliefs have in common is that there is very little or no evidence for them and that there is much good evidence against them. Yet all four beliefs have at times been passionately, ardently believed and acted upon by otherwise rational, sane and educated people - often resulting in those same people performing some of the most irrational, insane and barbaric acts imaginable.

"Thankfully, fascist, Nazi and Communist dogmas have been so discredited that almost no-one believes them any more. That is a development to be celebrated. But as the events of New York and Washington DC and Bali and Madrid and London demonstrate; as demonstrated by the genocidally stupid anti-contraceptive policies of the Catholic church in Africa and the homicidally stupid stem-cell policies of Christian churches in the US ; religious dogmas are alive and kicking and at work in the world.

“Reason and evidence and empiricism and science and liberal democracy - in short, the forces of the Enlightenment - have destroyed Communist and Fascist dogmas. Now it is time to do the same to the dogmas of religious faith.”

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

Mother Theressa shunned modern medicine for the people in her care preferring to keep them in a state of suffering that was conducive to the atmosphere she wanted her Nuns to live in. She also supported some pretty horrific regimes and embezzled funds. Not the Saint that the Catholic Church would like to paint her to be.
[/quote]

Haha, I wish I knew where you get this stuff from. I have not followed much of Mother Theressa, mostly because I have not been alive for very long so I have not had a chance. However, I can say that not very many people are perfect, but we try to be perfect. So, she may have done some things that were not considered perfect (I am not sure what), but guess what she did a lot of great things. And she is not a Saint, she is Beatified Mother Theressa.

[quote]
Large scale communism I agree has some pretty big issues but I don’t think any system can devalue the individual more than the Catholic Church which claims that we are all scum, inherently sinners and should writhe on the ground in joy that God cares enough to give us diseases, hardships and pain saying thank you master, give me more master like some sort of Sado Masochist being spanked by his Dominatrix.[/quote]

The Catholic Church does not claim we are scum, the Catholic Church actually says we are all capable of being perfect beings; who were seduced into being enslaved by Lucifer (Angel of light), at the Fall. And, when you repent and believe in the Good News, and are baptized, you become of G-d. Nice try though.

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

So the Roman Church is going back to it’s polytheistic roots step by step ;-)[/quote]

I know you jest, but so people do not take this the wrong way, no we are not. We never took Mary as Deity.[/quote]

Face it, your religion is polytheistic (at least as much so as Hinduism) and practices human sacrifice and canibalism.

You can wrap it up in fancy language but at the root, that is what your religions practices are. Not that there is anythign wrong with that ;-)[/quote]

Nay on the polytheistic, and yes on the second two. Are Bible, doctrine, and tradition do not point nor say more than one G-d.[/quote]

Your Bible certainly does in the old testament and the oldest documents it is formed from, your tradition is actually Polythestic. JHW was the war God from a Polytheistic religion. Your doctrine skirts round it with semantics.[/quote]

What is JHW, you mean YHW?

Where is your proof in the Hebrew Bible that we had multiple gods? Skirts around it with semantics, I am pretty sure it is very clear that there is only one G-d. Specially when it says something on the line of, “There is only one G-d.”

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

As I have stated elsewhere. The group of people who are being nice because they want to be nice and because they are focussed on this life really should be nicer than the group of people who are only being nice because they are told to by an unseen master so that they can get a reward in the next life.[/quote]

LOL. Is that what you think Christianity is? Really? [/quote]

At a very basic and ridiculously simplified level yes that is the case.[/quote]

Not even true “at a very basic and ridiculously simplified level.”

You probably know that. Or maybe you don’t. If case you don’t, by any chance have you ever heard of the term “invincible ignorance”?

[/quote]

At the most basic level the message of God is be nice to each other so that you get to sit by my side in heaven after you die.[/quote]

I think it is more “Know me” and “Love thy neighbor”, than it is to be nice. Sometimes loving does not equal being nice.

Seriously, from an atheist perspective, G-d is not really all that nice (and we are supposed to be like Him), I mean He kills all the first born in world, unless you have blood on your door, he asks you to kill your precious (and best) live stock to offer Him food, He asks grown men to kill their first born sons, He kills whole kingdoms off, multiple kingdoms, he even strikes down a man for simply helping a man when he loses grip on something.

Don’t get me started on the idea of having His own son slain so a bunch of adopted children can enjoy Heaven, what kind of person would kill their own blood to save basically “street kids.”

Being a Christian is more than being nice, some people may preach that is what it means to be a Christian. Being nice is a side effect of being a Christian, not the purpose or reason.

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
<<< Nay on the polytheistic, and yes on the second two. Are Bible, doctrine, and tradition do not point nor say more than one G-d.[/quote]
This controversy has sucked at least as bad as I thought it was going to. I need a break. Lemme just say on a positive note that there is no polytheism in the roman catholic church. Theology proper, as far as I’ve seen, has been kept very pure. They have one God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Nothing I’ve said should be construed otherwise.

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]IrishSteel wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:

…again, and i stress, people killing people in the name of atheism. Give me examples? Not ideology, not stress related, not madness, but purely killings in the name of atheism…
[/quote]

aye - but see, you had to add all sorts of caveats to your request . . . when one does not have a religious ideology - it is replaced with another ideology . . . thus any ideology based on the absence of religion would qualify . . .

everyone killed in russia from 19-teens through 1990 . . . just a few . . .[/quote]

Stalin was in a seminary preparing to become a Priest before he became to all intents and purposes a God to his people so not sure where the atheism comes in on that example.[/quote]

So because he was in a seminary, that makes him not an “atheist.” I put atheist in quotes because of course he - like anyone - will find a “God.” He found himself. Just like most modern secularists.

I suppose you also believe that HItler was an artist becuase he studied painting?

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

I’d say atheistic atrocities are compounded by the pridefullness of atheists who trivialize the oppressed and murdered, by denying why they were oppressed and murdered under their banner.
[/quote]

Atheist system/people (Soviets, China, etc.) by their very nature devalue the human being. The next step of destroying life by the millions is merely a bureaucratic move. [/quote]

That is simply not true. A religion because it believes in an after life actually has less incentive to minimise suffering in the here and now.

If I let you suffer now, the suffering is good for your soul therefore I am helping you. (Mother Theressa had logic that ran along those lines)

If I go and blow myself up taking with me the enemies of my God then I will get my reward in the afterlife.

Neither of those positions would happen in an atheist society where the greater good of the community is all that should be important. (I know that the greater good argument has been horrifically misapplied however it is not the argument that is wrong.)[/quote]

Mother Theresa’s logic did not run along those lines - where do you get this stuff from? She worked her entire life to help the poor and sick. What she said (and I think this is what you’re referring to) about suffering is: that we can all bear suffering, even the worst suffering imaginable, if we realize that the suffering here on earth will seem but a minor inconvenience, like a brief stay in an uncomfortable motel, compared to the blessedness of heaven.

Her engagement in and with the world and its suffering - like the work of everyone in the Church that precedes and follows her - was only deepened by her faith. Quite the opposite, in fact, to what you’re suggesting.

The Church has performed more compassionate acts than any other group of people on earth. Ever. Bar none. And its members do so because they have the strength to do so; because they have a standard by which to compare present reality; because they are compelled to do so by love. The existence of heaven and heavenly things only furthers and deepens our engagement in the world.

I’d be glad to argue this^ - I do think you’re extremely confused on this matter.

But that’s another topic: what I was saying is that atheist peoples/systems fundamentally devalue the human being. Do I really have to argue that Communism does so? That Communist regimes have not only done so - but thereby proceed in a kind of nightmare logic to deciminate huge mases of people? Do I really have to argue that?

[/quote]

Mother Theressa shunned modern medicine for the people in her care preferring to keep them in a state of suffering that was conducive to the atmosphere she wanted her Nuns to live in. She also supported some pretty horrific regimes and embezzled funds. Not the Saint that the Catholic Church would like to paint her to be.

Large scale communism I agree has some pretty big issues but I don’t think any system can devalue the individual more than the Catholic Church which claims that we are all scum, inherently sinners and should writhe on the ground in joy that God cares enough to give us diseases, hardships and pain saying thank you master, give me more master like some sort of Sado Masochist being spanked by his Dominatrix.[/quote]

That’s a pretty extraordinary claim - will you please provide evidence and - especially - context for that? The medicines - I have no idea. The horrific regimes/embezzling funds - I’ll bet she was trying in very difficult circumstances to care for the sick and needy. The world is a complicated place and sometimes we have to do things that serve a greater good. Anyway, I’ll await the evidence.

As Brother Chris said, she isn’t a Saint. Even Saints, however, are sinners, and are imperfect.

The Catholic Church is the first institution in the world that made the extraordinary claim that each and every human being is precious. More precious than any of us can imagine. Ummmm…I’m not sure about how that squares with the idea that it also thinks we’re scum.

You obviously don’t understand what is meant by a fallen human nature and sin. Too bad - you might actually find it extremely interesting and enlightening.

I guess you’re counting on the “invisible ignorance” loophole. LOL!

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

As I have stated elsewhere. The group of people who are being nice because they want to be nice and because they are focussed on this life really should be nicer than the group of people who are only being nice because they are told to by an unseen master so that they can get a reward in the next life.[/quote]

LOL. Is that what you think Christianity is? Really? [/quote]

At a very basic and ridiculously simplified level yes that is the case.[/quote]

Not even true “at a very basic and ridiculously simplified level.”

You probably know that. Or maybe you don’t. If case you don’t, by any chance have you ever heard of the term “invincible ignorance”?

[/quote]

At the most basic level the message of God is be nice to each other so that you get to sit by my side in heaven after you die.[/quote]

Actually, no. It’s not a quid pro quo thing. I know you want it to be that way. But that’s just a straw man argument. I know it’s a very popular stereotype among secularists. But that fact doesn’t mean it’s even remotely true.

The whole assertion that religious are somehow morally superior or better always makes me roll my eyes because some of the meanest people I have known were also “good Catholics.” By contrast, the most interesting people I’ve met were non-religious of varying degrees.

Whatever examples of “bad things done in the name of atheism” you can list, there are similar examples of bad things done in the name of religion. The Crusades come to mind. The KKK was based on supposedly Christian principles. White supremacists also claim that their positions are justified based on Christian principles. So don’t go down that road.

As Cockney has mentioned, communism was itself a “religion.” The reason communism suppressed other religions was that these other religions were seen as a threat to the “religion” of communism. This is nothing new, as many of the major religions frown when their adherents want to participate in other religions. I once read somewhere that the Catholic Church strongly advised, and perhaps even outright prohibited, Catholics not to practice any form of yoga because they saw this as a “religion of the body.” That’s kind of paranoid, IMO.

The idea that religious people don’t do bad things because they fear punishment from G-d is laughable as I’ve seen lots of religious people do bad things. And if you think about it, the idea that people only refrain from doing bad things because they fear retribution from some invisible cop is a sad statement about humanity and shows how emotionally immature many people are.

Religious people have a tough time with atheism/agnosticism because they’re so used to having an ideology, which is pervasive in religion, that they assume that atheism/agnosticism also has an “ideology.” They then assume that such ideology must be negative or immoral or whatever. Here’s the thing - atheism/agnosticism have no ideology. It is up to the individual to determine how to live his or her life. That’s the point. If anything, ideology for an atheist or an agnostic would simple be this: accept nothing without evidence.

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

I’d say atheistic atrocities are compounded by the pridefullness of atheists who trivialize the oppressed and murdered, by denying why they were oppressed and murdered under their banner.
[/quote]

Atheist system/people (Soviets, China, etc.) by their very nature devalue the human being. The next step of destroying life by the millions is merely a bureaucratic move. [/quote]

That is simply not true. A religion because it believes in an after life actually has less incentive to minimise suffering in the here and now.

If I let you suffer now, the suffering is good for your soul therefore I am helping you. (Mother Theressa had logic that ran along those lines)

If I go and blow myself up taking with me the enemies of my God then I will get my reward in the afterlife.

Neither of those positions would happen in an atheist society where the greater good of the community is all that should be important. (I know that the greater good argument has been horrifically misapplied however it is not the argument that is wrong.)[/quote]

Mother Theresa’s logic did not run along those lines - where do you get this stuff from? She worked her entire life to help the poor and sick. What she said (and I think this is what you’re referring to) about suffering is: that we can all bear suffering, even the worst suffering imaginable, if we realize that the suffering here on earth will seem but a minor inconvenience, like a brief stay in an uncomfortable motel, compared to the blessedness of heaven.

Her engagement in and with the world and its suffering - like the work of everyone in the Church that precedes and follows her - was only deepened by her faith. Quite the opposite, in fact, to what you’re suggesting.

The Church has performed more compassionate acts than any other group of people on earth. Ever. Bar none. And its members do so because they have the strength to do so; because they have a standard by which to compare present reality; because they are compelled to do so by love. The existence of heaven and heavenly things only furthers and deepens our engagement in the world.

I’d be glad to argue this^ - I do think you’re extremely confused on this matter.

But that’s another topic: what I was saying is that atheist peoples/systems fundamentally devalue the human being. Do I really have to argue that Communism does so? That Communist regimes have not only done so - but thereby proceed in a kind of nightmare logic to deciminate huge mases of people? Do I really have to argue that?

[/quote]

Mother Theressa shunned modern medicine for the people in her care preferring to keep them in a state of suffering that was conducive to the atmosphere she wanted her Nuns to live in. She also supported some pretty horrific regimes and embezzled funds. Not the Saint that the Catholic Church would like to paint her to be.

Large scale communism I agree has some pretty big issues but I don’t think any system can devalue the individual more than the Catholic Church which claims that we are all scum, inherently sinners and should writhe on the ground in joy that God cares enough to give us diseases, hardships and pain saying thank you master, give me more master like some sort of Sado Masochist being spanked by his Dominatrix.[/quote]

That’s a pretty extraordinary claim - will you please provide evidence and - especially - context for that? The medicines - I have no idea. The horrific regimes/embezzling funds - I’ll bet she was trying in very difficult circumstances to care for the sick and needy. The world is a complicated place and sometimes we have to do things that serve a greater good. Anyway, I’ll await the evidence.

As Brother Chris said, she isn’t a Saint. Even Saints, however, are sinners, and are imperfect.

The Catholic Church is the first institution in the world that made the extraordinary claim that each and every human being is precious. More precious than any of us can imagine. Ummmm…I’m not sure about how that squares with the idea that it also thinks we’re scum.

You obviously don’t understand what is meant by a fallen human nature and sin. Too bad - you might actually find it extremely interesting and enlightening.

I guess you’re counting on the “invisible ignorance” loophole. LOL!
[/quote]

I don’t know about the claims of embezzling and corruption, but I do know this - a large number of the problems plaguing Africa could be solved if the population practiced birth control. Yet the Catholic Church still clings to their Byzantine notion that birth control is wrong and as a result is fighting a losing battle against poverty in Africa.

BTW - I thought JP II made Theresa a saint? If not, then I recall that she was put on a fast-track to sainthood.

Isn’t it amazing how Atheism quickly becomes anti-communism? That a lack of belief in a deity suddenly doesn’t qualify.

So, to restate with a new addition.

Atheists can not murder

Atheists can not assume the role of a despot

Atheists are capitalists.

What else?

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Isn’t it amazing how Atheism quickly becomes anti-communism? That a lack of belief in a deity suddenly doesn’t qualify.

So, to restate with a new addition.

Atheists can not murder

Atheists can not assume the role of a despot

Atheists are capitalists.

What else? [/quote]

I’m very much anti-communist and pro-capitalist. Many people choose atheism/agnosticism because they enjoy thinking for themselves and are tired of having a bunch of cranky church elders, imams, or cranky old guys who’ve sworn to never have sex (also known as priests) telling them how to live their lives. Capitalism rewards creativity and original thinking. Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are both agnostics. Both of these men also donate much of their wealth to charity. I’m also very much pro-family and I’ve served in the military. (Yes, I was an agnostic in a foxhole and I’ve met a few atheists who were in there with me.) These traits are not limited to religious people - I’m not sure why people think that only religious people share these values other than they want to discredit atheism/agnosticism.

Anyone can be a murderer, criminal, or despot. I don’t see why you all think these are limited to atheists or agnostics. If you’re going to debate, Sloth, than debate, and stop making these baseless statements.

[quote]MikeTheBear wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Isn’t it amazing how Atheism quickly becomes anti-communism? That a lack of belief in a deity suddenly doesn’t qualify.

So, to restate with a new addition.

Atheists can not murder

Atheists can not assume the role of a despot

Atheists are capitalists.

What else? [/quote]

I’m very much anti-communist and pro-capitalist. Many people choose atheism/agnosticism because they enjoy thinking for themselves and are tired of having a bunch of cranky church elders, imams, or cranky old guys who’ve sworn to never have sex (also known as priests) telling them how to live their lives. Capitalism rewards creativity and original thinking. Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are both agnostics. Both of these men also donate much of their wealth to charity. I’m also very much pro-family and I’ve served in the military. (Yes, I was an agnostic in a foxhole and I’ve met a few atheists who were in there with me.) These traits are not limited to religious people - I’m not sure why people think that only religious people share these values other than they want to discredit atheism/agnosticism.

Anyone can be a murderer, criminal, or despot. I don’t see why you all think these are limited to atheists or agnostics. If you’re going to debate, Sloth, than debate, and stop making these baseless statements.
[/quote]

Seriously, what is the issue here?

No system, no society, no organization in the history of the world rivals the bloodiness, the cruelty, the blithe disregard for the sanctity of human life, the sheer number of corpses that were ruthlessly piled up by Communist/collectivist/statist regimes - all of which were explicitly atheist.

Are you actually going to deny this? LOL?